I'll be curious to see how the ground game goes. I suspect Warren and Buttigieg are going to have strong ground games and might overperform their polling.
People who liked the Apprentice I bet. In other words morons.Who tf are the 4% that approve of him personally and disapprove of his policies???
As an aside, I think an eventual house vote on impeachment is more likely inevitable at this point now that we're in a pseudo impeachment investigation. At least, I'd hope dems are smart enough not to set themselves up for such an utter blunder. Because if Trump ends up being able to campaign on the dems effectively clearing him, then lol.
And with that in mind, it's important for dems now, especially in leadership, to not weaken that eventual inevitability.
This is also important. If you start impeachment proceedings then you need to be 110% sure that the caucus will vote to impeach. If the proceedings are inconclusive then it hands him a huge propaganda win.
Correction, the NYT usuals muddied the waters.
Everyone else has been pointing out how impeachable this all is. And asking more questions of trump.
Antonio Brown is not a person to look up to, but good on him for calling out kraft and Roethlisberger
Given the accusations against him, this is more likely him being petty.
😃Selzer poll shows the Civiqs one wasn't an outlier. Bernie is failing to attract any Clinton 2016 supporters.
jfcyeah the fact that Pelosi may be preventing impeachment because she doesn't trust Schumer is rather terrifying. this whole impeachment saga really reflects poorly on the both of them
Get all Senate Dems to vote for conviction
Voting on impeachment will have no impact without an investigation. We are doing the investigation now.
That was the same argument when the Republicans pulled that bullshit with Garland. "We can't fight for this seat, that would break norms...... let's wait until the 2016 election"
Dem leadership's problem is they all got scared for life after Reagan and always believe some silent majority is out there waiting to vote against them in mass if they stand up for what they claim to believe in.
It's more than at a minimum, cars have been banned since 1896, and are only allowed in emergencies. It forced me as a kid to learn how to ride a bike because my family wanted to do a tour of the island.
I wonder if Bernie's people still break for Biden if he drops out.
Whip the Dem votes in the Senate, which I honestly hadn't considered before. If even one stupid D senator voted against conviction it would completely torpedo the message.
*Joe Manchin looms silently in the background*Whip the Dem votes in the Senate, which I honestly hadn't considered before. If even one stupid D senator voted against conviction it would completely torpedo the message.
Whip the Dem votes in the Senate, which I honestly hadn't considered before. If even one stupid D senator voted against conviction it would completely torpedo the message.
Yes. It would then give Susan Collins cover to acquit and call the decision ~~~bipartisan~~~.Whip the Dem votes in the Senate, which I honestly hadn't considered before. If even one stupid D senator voted against conviction it would completely torpedo the message.
I feel like there's a 100% chance Manchin would not vote to convict if the 2/3rds aren't there (which they aren't)Yes. It would then give Susan Collins cover to acquit and call the decision ~~~bipartisan~~~.
But I don't know how realistic that possibility is.
I wonder if Bernie's people still break for Biden if he drops out.
There has been a significant change in morning consult's tracking of it., in that Biden's second choice is split almost equally between Bernie and Warren, favoring Bernie slightly, Bernie's Biden/Warren favoring Biden slightly, Warren is Bernie/Biden, favoring Bernie slightly (oddly, Warren's base has warmed to Biden significantly). All within 1-2%, so basically someone dropping out atm will have pretty much no effect on who's winning.I wonder if Bernie's people still break for Biden if he drops out.
Or voters are a lot more surface level than you think.I never actually believed those polls saying Bernie/Biden voters break for the other guy. To me those are people that are probably not voting for either one. They're just picking names in a hat.
Eh. There are going to be respondents that don't even understand what the words let alone what the questions mean.Who tf are the 4% that approve of him personally and disapprove of his policies???
Whip the Dem votes in the Senate, which I honestly hadn't considered before. If even one stupid D senator voted against conviction it would completely torpedo the message.
edit: I have no idea whether Pelosi "trusts" Schumer or what, but I hadn't thought about how massively risky it is to have a Dem senator go rogue on the vote.
Anyone get the feeling that Hillary's campaign had more of the "she's a woman/I'm with her" vibe that warrens/kamala/Klobuchar? I feel like it hasn't really come up. I think that's good
Lmao, I hadn't thought about that
This has been a giant unanswered question since his announcement.
I don't really understand. What did you want the Democrats (in minorities in both houses) to do about Garland? Have Obama appoint him via executive order?
Democratic VOTERS don't give a shit about the Supreme Court. That's the problem. Not that "dem leadership" didn't do anything.
This has been a giant unanswered question since his announcement.
This has been a giant unanswered question since his announcement.