This should be an easy whip to get to the number we need.
"DON'T LOSE THIS SECURITY BLANKET THOUGHT! YOU MAY NOT GET ANOTHER!"
I get it, but maybe Coats didn't and footdragged before being demanded to and resigned, taking Gorden with him.
I also wonder if the sham Biden investigation extortion affair was not the goal like you said, but as his REWARD upon successfully outing spies or getting Ukraine screwed over for territory.
Thank goodness for the people with enough of a conscience to leak this stuff.
No one has ever expected the Senate to convict!as I doubt the senate republicans will flip regardless of what turns up,
Go look at how fast Amash got pounced on and driven out of the party. They all know it's a Trump party now, any toe out of line and you're out.Do you guys think that the political calculus has finally shifted enough for Republicans that it is more politically expedient for them to throw Trump to the wolves than to continue shielding him?
I'm still not quite sure what to make of it.
Also, a year or two from now, and with the benefit of hindsight, I think Pelosi will be vindicated for how she timed this.
My hot take: It is the attempted systemic destruction of America's spy network on Putin's behalf.
The Guiliani but about him saying the ambassador was under Soros control has me thinking the dude has gone nuts.
Also, this says...nothing? No explanation at all.
*avatar quote* 😂
But even within Trump's party, few have gone so far as to say they would consider it appropriate for the president to solicit foreign help in an American election. And his political fate may hinge on how lawmakers and the public assess not only his intentions on the call, but also the actions of his subordinates in the events surrounding it
.
U.S. officials described an atmosphere of intense pressure inside the NSC and other departments since the existence of the whistleblower complaint became known, with some officials facing suspicion that they had a hand either in the complaint or in relaying damaging information to the whistleblower, whose identity has not been revealed and who is entitled to legal protection.
One official — speaking, like others, on the condition of anonymity — described the climate as verging on "bloodletting."
Several officials traced their initial concerns about the path of U.S.-Ukrainian relations to news reports and interviews granted by Giuliani in which he began to espouse views and concerns that did not appear connected to U.S. priorities or policy.
The former New York mayor appears to have seen Zelensky, a political neophyte elected president of Ukraine in April and sworn in in May, as a potential ally on two political fronts: punishing those Giuliani suspected of playing a role in exposing the Ukraine-related corruption of former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort, and delivering political ammunition against Biden.
After the conclusion of the Mueller investigation, Giuliani turned his attention to Ukraine, officials said, and soon began pushing for personnel changes at the embassy while seeking meetings with Zelensky subordinates. He also had his own emissaries in Ukraine who were meeting with officials, setting up meetings for him and sending back information that he could circulate in the United States.
The U.S. ambassador to Ukraine, Marie Yovanovitch, became a primary Giuliani target.
Yovanovitch, a longtime State Department Foreign Service officer, arrived in Ukraine as ambassador at the end of the Obama administration, more than two years after an uprising centered on Kiev's Independence Square ousted the Russian-leaning government.
Though she was widely respected in the national security community for her efforts to prod Ukraine to take on corruption, Giuliani targeted Yovanovitch with wild accusations including that she played a secret role in exposing Manafort and was part of a conspiracy orchestrated by the liberal financier George Soros.
"She should be part of the investigation as part of the collusion," Giuliani said in a recent interview with The Washington Post, adding that "she is now working for Soros." Yovanovitch is still employed by the State Department and is a fellow at Georgetown University. She declined to comment.
Giuliani also said the entire State Department was a problem, and officials familiar with his actions say he regularly briefed Trump on his Ukrainian endeavors. "The State Department is a bureaucracy that needs to change," he told The Post.
Many of Giuliani's charges were either recycled from, or subsequently echoed by, right-wing media outlets.
In late March, the president's son Donald Trump Jr. amplified this campaign with a tweet calling for the removal of "Obama's U.S. Ambassador."
Yovanovitch, who was to depart in July after a three-year assignment, was prematurely ordered back to Washington, a move that both baffled and unnerved senior officials at the State Department and the White House, officials said.
Within days of her ouster on May 9, Giuliani seemed determined to seize an unsanctioned diplomatic role for himself, announcing plans to travel to Ukraine to push for investigations that would "be very, very helpful to my client, and may turn out to be helpful to my government."
Giuliani canceled the trip amid an ensuing backlash over his purpose but later met with one of Zelensky's senior aides in Madrid and pressed the issue of Ukraine's helping against Biden.
The Guiliani but about him saying the ambassador was under Soros control has me thinking the dude has gone nuts.
Also, this says...nothing? No explanation at all.
How does an intelligence whistleblower file a complaint?
The employee submits the complaint to the inspector general of the intelligence community. The inspector general is required to review it within 14 days and then determines whether the complaint is of "urgent concern," which is defined as involving conduct "relating to" the "administration or operation of an intelligence activity within the authority of the Director of National Intelligence involving classified information."
If the complaint appears credible, the inspector general is required to forward it to the director of national intelligence, who then has seven days to send the complaint and any accompanying information to congressional intelligence oversight committees. If the inspector general decides it's not credible, or if he or she does not act on the complaint, the whistleblower can contact the congressional intelligence committees directly but must tell the inspector general and seek guidance from the director of national intelligence to contact the committees securely.
On Aug. 12, an intelligence community employee submitted a complaint to acting inspector general Michael Atkinson, who concluded the report was urgent and credible and forwarded it to Maguire.
Maguire, however, did not send it to the intelligence committees within seven days, as the statute requires, and failed to give the whistleblower guidance on how to securely contact the committees directly. Since then, Maguire has also refused to comply with a subpoena issued by the House Intelligence Committee, compelling him to produce an unredacted copy of the whistleblower complaint.
In a Sept. 17 letter to Schiff, Maguire's general counsel, Jason Klitenic, said the whistleblower complaint was determined not to be an "urgent concern."
Can a mod threadmark this post? Asking seriously.Might be worth revisiting the timeline here. (apologies to whoever I saw this one from before on here, this thread moves too fast).
7/24- Trump has phone call with Ukrainian President Zelensky. One week prior he instructed mulvaney to ensure a 400 million aid package approved by congress doesn't get to Ukraine.
7/28- Trump announces that Dan Coats, Director of National Intelligence is stepping down. This is read as Trump forcing out Coats, the two haven't been seeing eye to eye.
7/31- Trump has a phone call with Putin. This is the the one that was supposedly about "vast wildfires affecting siberia."
8/3- Trump requests a list of all active top spies from the office of the director of national intelligence. Remember, this is Coats' office and Coats is on his way out.
8/7- Jon Huntsman abruptly resigns his position as US abassador to Russia, presumably to "spend time with family."
8/8- (and this is the weird one) CNN reports that on 8/8 Coats interrupts a meeting that his deputy Sue Gordon was giving on election security to convince her that she should resign. Sue Gordon is a well respected 30 year veteran of the intelligence community. Whatever Coats said to her, her plans "change suddenly" and she issues her resignation on the spot within minutes of this discussion, resigning in tandem with Coats.
8/12- A Whistleblower issues a formal complaint about Trump's behavior to the office of the director of national intelligence- again, the same office Sue and Dan just resigned from.
9/9- CNN breaks a story, Putin has publicly outed the identity of a former CIA asset, extradited from russia in 2017. Said asset is living in Washington DC and may now be a target. Worth noting that Putin has been hunting former moles for the past year and absolutely is responsible for several killings and attempted killings in the UK of similar former agents.
9/10- National Security Advisor John Bolton attempts to resign. Trump fires him instead.
9/13- Schiff goes public with a complaint that ODNI is illegally witholding a whistleblower complaint from house intelligence.
Can anyone seriously look at this timeline and say there's "nothing there" or that Trump pressuring Zelensky (which Guiliani and Trump freely admit to while trying their damndest to keep the complaint from congress) is even the biggest thing in the complaint?
Might be worth revisiting the timeline here. (apologies to whoever I saw this one from before on here, this thread moves too fast).
7/24- Trump has phone call with Ukrainian President Zelensky. One week prior he instructed mulvaney to ensure a 400 million aid package approved by congress doesn't get to Ukraine.
7/28- Trump announces that Dan Coats, Director of National Intelligence is stepping down. This is read as Trump forcing out Coats, the two haven't been seeing eye to eye.
7/31- Trump has a phone call with Putin. This is the the one that was supposedly about "vast wildfires affecting siberia."
8/3- Trump requests a list of all active top spies from the office of the director of national intelligence. Remember, this is Coats' office and Coats is on his way out.
8/7- Jon Huntsman abruptly resigns his position as US abassador to Russia, presumably to "spend time with family."
8/8- (and this is the weird one) CNN reports that on 8/8 Coats interrupts a meeting that his deputy Sue Gordon was giving on election security to convince her that she should resign. Sue Gordon is a well respected 30 year veteran of the intelligence community. Whatever Coats said to her, her plans "change suddenly" and she issues her resignation on the spot within minutes of this discussion, resigning in tandem with Coats.
8/12- A Whistleblower issues a formal complaint about Trump's behavior to the office of the director of national intelligence- again, the same office Sue and Dan just resigned from.
9/9- CNN breaks a story, Putin has publicly outed the identity of a former CIA asset, extradited from russia in 2017. Said asset is living in Washington DC and may now be a target. Worth noting that Putin has been hunting former moles for the past year and absolutely is responsible for several killings and attempted killings in the UK of similar former agents.
9/10- National Security Advisor John Bolton attempts to resign. Trump fires him instead.
9/13- Schiff goes public with a complaint that ODNI is illegally witholding a whistleblower complaint from house intelligence.
Can anyone seriously look at this timeline and say there's "nothing there" or that Trump pressuring Zelensky (which Guiliani and Trump freely admit to while trying their damndest to keep the complaint from congress) is even the biggest thing in the complaint?
The Guiliani but about him saying the ambassador was under Soros control has me thinking the dude has gone nuts.
Also, this says...nothing? No explanation at all.
He's not the fall guy when you're saying Trump asked him to do it.This Wapo story seems very tailored to throw Guiliani under the bus and make him the fall guy. I remember when DonJr was liking a bunch of tweets about Hunter Biden and Ukraine a few months ago with Guiliani started this mess.
This Wapo story seems very tailored to throw Guiliani under the bus and make him the fall guy. I remember when DonJr was liking a bunch of tweets about Hunter Biden and Ukraine a few months ago with Guiliani started this mess.
They're just closing them all on sight now. Which is really weird when there's actually news to them now with the race shifting, it's not the dead horserace it was for months upon months.Lol, I have no idea why my thread was closed when other single poll threads have stayed open.
Trump 2020? No, landslide victory!
That's America's clown you're talking about.
I'm not sure if you meant to type Ghouliani instead of Guiliani, but I can't stop picturing him as a Fallout ghoul and it just works.
A reminder that Rudy Giuliani was pushing unhinged conspiracy theories about George Soros on the president's propaganda network yesterday
Lol I figured I'd misspell his proper name so I just wrote that as I saw it in the thread before at some point.I'm not sure if you meant to type Ghouliani instead of Guiliani, but I can't stop picturing him as a Fallout ghoul and it just works.
I don't know if this belongs here but what do you guys think is generally the best objective magazine to subscribe to? I was thinking maybe the Atlantic or the New Yorker. What are your recommendations for thought provoking articles that are objective?