Eh. I'd prefer him to spend it than horde it. He could spend five times that and still not win the primary. But there'd be less money sitting around doing nothing.I’m still infuriated about the $47 million Steyer lit on fire. Ugh!
Politics isnt the utopia we all want to imagine. No doubt, Bernie's policies are magical, wonderful life affirming greatness that will make everything great again.....Problem is that's not how the world works. You need the inspiration combined with the realism for dems to gain ground. Repubs went all in on just fiction bullshit. Dems unfortunately, by their nature, can't buy into that scheme.Maybe AOC endorsed Bernie because he has the best policies and would make the best President.
Crazy.
Endorsements are never that simple.Maybe AOC endorsed Bernie because he has the best policies and would make the best President.
Crazy.
This WaPo article nailed it a month ago:The Warren healthcare thing has always struck me as she is abundantly aware it''s a fox news video clip waiting to happen. "YES, YOUR TAXES WILL GO UP", the end. dooooooooooooooooom
It just comes off to the rest of us as obvious. There has to be a better way to answer that.
Warren is obviously determined not to give people like Matthews and Stephanopoulos what they’re after. The question that interests me is, why are they so determined to get her to say that taxes would go up?
I suspect that if you asked them why the answer to that question is so important to them, they’d give you a bunch of substance-free hemming and hawing about how it’s a key political question and therefore they have to get an answer to it.
But if you pressed them and said, “But why does it actually matter? Why is it more important than the total cost people pay?”, they wouldn’t be able to come up with even a halfway plausible response.
That’s because from where they sit, there is almost no goal more important than creating moments that are dramatic and controversial, and will be replayed and discussed on their own networks and in other news outlets. Drama and controversy occur when a candidate says something that generates a strong reaction, often in the form of harsh criticism from the other party.
I didn't watch the debate nor plan to, but it's all in the game. A sordid game, but the game. At this stage, be combative. Keep educating, keep preaching, and keep telling them, the media, to fuck off. Make sure the message remains focused on the fact that the people have been getting suckered for their entire lives and paying more for less, far less.It’s almost as if we’re starting from the assumption that what we pay now is zero, so premiums that would disappear are irrelevant and the only question is how much taxes might increase.
This operates not just at the level of what individuals pay but at the level of what we pay as a society. One study from a conservative think tank determined that Bernie Sanders’ Medicare-for-all plan would cost $32 trillion over ten years, a figure that has been repeated approximately 32 trillion times to declare how monumentally costly it would be. But according to the government’s projections, the current system will cost about $50 trillion over the same time period, meaning Sanders’ plan is much cheaper than keeping things how they are, whatever else you might think of it.
Yet I have never once heard a politician asked, “You don’t support major reform to the health system, so under your plan we’ll have to pay $50 trillion for heath care over the next ten years. Where do you intend to get that $50 trillion?”
I’ve also never heard anyone press Sanders or Warren on whether, and by how much, total costs for families really will go down under their plans. Is the median family going to pay $500 less, or $1,500, or $5,000? We ought to know, at least to the greatest extent we can determine it.
It’s bothersome that we have all these problems in the country and world and as “liberals” people go out of their way to waste millions. is there a case to be made that the money spent helped open people to impeachment?I’m still infuriated about the $47 million Steyer lit on fire. Ugh!
maybe for unions and political orgs. I mean a politician endorsing another politician...? I mean maybe it is as simple as ideological proximity.Politics isnt the utopia we all want to imagine. No doubt, Bernie's policies are magical, wonderful life affirming greatness that will make everything great again.....Problem is that's not how the world works. You need the inspiration combined with the realism for dems to gain ground. Repubs went all in on just fiction bullshit. Dems unfortunately, by their nature, can't buy into that scheme.
Projection.This idea that we're all just soooooo absorbed with our preferred candidate that we just melt....is weird to me.
That was her attempt. She constantly brought up a couple of anecdotes of people on the trail that had what they thought was good insurance but didn't, in really, have enough coverage. And she brought up the statistic that 2 out of 3 people that went into bankruptcy over medical bills and issues had insurance.This WaPo article nailed it a month ago:
I didn't watch the debate nor plan to, but it's all in the game. A sordid game, but the game. At this stage, be combative. Keep educating, keep preaching, and keep telling them, the media, to fuck off. Make sure the message remains focused on the fact that the people have been getting suckered for their entire lives and paying more for less, far less.
Yes, but I wasn't going to say it. I was raised right. I only talk about people behind their backs. My momma taught me well.
Strong White (Gay) Daddy SyndromePete was being a straight up dickhead tonight. Like, all night. But he didn't get nearly as much hate for it that Castro got for his Biden clash.
He even got praised for it.
Yes, but I wasn't going to say it. I was raised right. I only talk about people behind their backs. My momma taught me well.
Pete and Klobuchar.
in 24 hours there were nearly 40 pages. Nothing changed. It's absurd.
You know there are those of us in here who support Warren and Bernie right?PoliERA, on a scale of 1-10 how much do you hate AOC suddenly?
I mean, she's a Bernie Bro now, right?
biden looks like a fucking nut in that picture
Warren and Bernie, with a little of Booker thrown in.
As long as there are 40 billion candidates on the stage, you'll never get extended moments to hear what people have to say. Debates will be nothing more than shouty theatre until there's time to sit down and talk like adults.Damn 5 pages of talking about AOC LOL!
I guess when you think about it this debate kinda sucked.
What was the context here? I missed the last hour.
looks like the real life version of this
deeply embarrassing moment for Biden
Biden said that he was the only one to have ever achieved anything (lol).
Warren talked about getting the CFPB from an idea she had in a paper to a new Federal agency.
Biden the proceeded to take credit.
She threw a bit of shade, rightly so.
He decided he would be condescending and continued to interrupt her.
Women don't respond favourably to this, because all of the above happens to them a lot.
Biden did a lot of mansplaining there
Biden said that he was the only one to have ever achieved anything (lol).
Warren talked about getting the CFPB from an idea she had in a paper to a new Federal agency.
Biden the proceeded to take credit.
She threw a bit of shade, rightly so.
He decided he would be condescending and continued to interrupt her.
Women don't respond favourably to this, because all of the above happens to them a lot.
People just used it for their opening statements about taking on trump lmao. what a waste of time. NYT sucked assThe impeachment question did absolutely nothing at the debate.
Pretty much everyone agreed he should be impeached/removed and moved on lol! Surprised no one took shots at Gabbard or Pete about being squeamish on impeachment at the onset.
Audience wasn't reacting much to the response either.
This and her stance on immigration is gonna throw a lot of question marks on many voters; I hope she improves down the road on these policies. She's nuanced on economic policy but superficial on foreign and immigration policy.
I mean...a lot of the voting base nationwide wants us out of the middle east.
It's not as simplified as what that person stated.
Yeah, that was definitely a lowlight for her. Same damn thing that concerns me about Bernie.This and her stance on immigration is gonna throw a lot of question marks on many voters; I hope she improves down the road on these policies. She's nuanced on economic policy but superficial on foreign and immigration policy.
Thanks!Biden said that he was the only one to have ever achieved anything (lol).
Warren talked about getting the CFPB from an idea she had in a paper to a new Federal agency.
Biden the proceeded to take credit.
She threw a bit of shade, rightly so.
He decided he would be condescending and continued to interrupt her.
Women don't respond favourably to this, because all of the above happens to them a lot.
Bernie supporter and Bernie Bro are two different things. You can be the former without going insane and self-creating a cult of personality like the latter does.PoliERA, on a scale of 1-10 how much do you hate AOC suddenly?
I mean, she's a Bernie Bro now, right?
It kinda is helping solidify it yeah.That COH for Biden is baaaaad. I might be wrong, but it basically means that a Warren win is inevitable right?