The article does not talk or allude how diehard sanders supporters are and I have doubts you read it.
-
Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
-
We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.
US PoliEra 2020 |OT 1| THE ANTI BENGHAZI (Read Staff Post)
- Thread starter TheHunter
- Start date
- Status
"And Sanders apologized last year after several campaign aides were accused of harassing women. His online supporters — the so-called Bernie Bros — have been accused of sexist attacks against rivals, critics and reporters."
Oh I read it. I can quote it to
The quote does not talk or allude to how diehard sanders supporters are but this is getting into matters that are beside the topic at hand. Its clear you're willing to disregard the experiences of others to substitute your own when they disagree with yours so have a good day.
hmm. Same supporters that probably stayed home or Voted for Stein in 2016
Warren.
If they can twist themselves into a Biden endorsement after that interview then lol.
Ah, so CNN can have receipts for something more sophisticated than Jr High "He Said, She Said" reality TV garbage!
It's gonna be Warren
MAYBE Biden if they go the route of "getting trump out of office is the ONLY thing that matters"
MAYBE Biden if they go the route of "getting trump out of office is the ONLY thing that matters"
Pete and beholdeth the power of Wine Caves!!!
Most likely Biden or Klobuchar tho.
They're going to endorse Tulsi and have someone who claims to be a liberal but is actually a member of Proud Boys write the piece.
New York Times will be changing their name to the New Yang Times tomorrow.
But actually Warren.
Hillary's interview wasn't as much of a shit show I bet though.
Getting endorsed by the NYT is kind of like winning the NFC east
congrats on being the kings of trash mountain I guess
congrats on being the kings of trash mountain I guess
I'm pretty sure Hillary supporters did exact same thing. And attack people for voting 3rd party.
I didn't see this covered, but oh boy.
If you're in a solid red or blue state with absolutely zero chance of flipping, then I think it's valid as a protest vote.
Protest votes really do help us when we're trying to create the narrative to abolish the EC.
Someone you like is a third party candidate. Are we vote policing?
Well the last cycle had really bad third party candidates, so yea I'll call out people who vote for bad people!
well this is the most crowded field in decades and the NYT is super amped up on white educated subs from their faux #Resistance post-2016 push.
I said nothing about them being a bad/good person lol...you asked for a valid reason for someone to vote third party.
People have made this argument and while I see the logic behind it, I don't buy it.
I think especially this year it will be important to register a vote specifically against Trump, which means voting for the nominee. Yeah, maybe your state always votes 60-40 Democrat and it won't make a practical difference, but every vote gets added to the popular vote total. Writing in Mickey Mouse makes no dent in Trump's popular vote lead (or more likely, deficit). If he somehow manages to win again, I think it's crucial to at least take that talking point away from him - you do not represent the people. If nothing else it'll harden opposition to the Electoral College.
Also the degree to which some states are "safe" can easily be jeopardized. A few months before the last election I might have said Minnesota, Wisconsin and Michigan would all vote blue. I know people who refused to vote, or wrote in Bernie, or what-have-you and wouldn't you know it, Clinton won Minnesota by a terribly close-for-comfort margin. She lost the other two. The whole idea behind her election chances was the existence of "the blue wall," the states that have voted Democratic since 1992, and it came crumbling down. Hell, that's probably why she picked Kaine - it was considered more valuable to get a boost in Virginia (which had only voted blue twice since 1964) than to do anything for her in WI/MI/PA which were considered locks. Those states flipping was partly due to increased Trump support of course, but also significantly due to decreased Democratic turnout (look at Wisconsin - Trump actually got about 2,000 less votes there than Romney, but Clinton shed nearly 240,000 votes compared to Obama).
Point is, don't fucking risk it, and stay on the right side of history.
I'm trying to think of a third party candidate who would would have actually made a passable president and... Perot? Anderson in 1980?
I understand protest votes and I understand strategically voting third party to get them to the 5% funding threshold, but usually it's a bad vote.
I understand protest votes and I understand strategically voting third party to get them to the 5% funding threshold, but usually it's a bad vote.
damn. warren bump incoming i guess. i dont know how ill differentiate whether changes in her polls are the consequence of the bernie scandal or the NYT endorsement
But then I can't feel special for not being a mindless drone to the two-party system or lord my moral and intellectual superiority over spineless corporate Dems.
lol what the fuck is vote policing
if you deliberately cast a vote that makes the Nazi more likely to win you have to own that choice, if you want to call that policing then so be it
excuse me the NFC East is the only (NFC) division to beat the Patriots in the Super Bowl
- Status