axios
Sen. Joe Manchin: Hunter Biden is a relevant impeachment trial witness https://www.axios.com/joe-manchin-h...ent-bd87b99c-227b-4475-9376-40380be8cbd9.html
axios
Sen. Joe Manchin: Hunter Biden is a relevant impeachment trial witness https://www.axios.com/joe-manchin-h...ent-bd87b99c-227b-4475-9376-40380be8cbd9.html
.
@WillieGeist
asks
@Sen_JoeManchin
if Hunter Biden is a 'relevant witness.' Sen. Manchin responds: "I think so; I really do."
Remember Republicans, the Democrats already had 17 witnesses, we were given NONE! Witnesses are up to the House, not up to the Senate. Don't let the Dems play you!
Gardner is following the Dirty Dean Heller model of accepting his fucked fate and going all-in on the MAGA base to save him.Is Gardner just conceding his seat at this point? You would think you would at least try to appear more moderate given you are in a state that has voted blue in the last three cycles and appears to be getting bluer.
Gardner is following the Dirty Dean Heller model of accepting his fucked fate and going all-in on the MAGA base to save him.
Gardner is following the Dirty Dean Heller model of accepting his fucked fate and going all-in on the MAGA base to save him.
@washingtonpost
Human-trafficking groups refuse to attend Ivanka Trump's White House summit https://wapo.st/2U8aa5d
It all comes back to Bolton. A Bolton investigation should be launched, so that we can find out who he is, where he comes from and how much he knows.We've lived through a period where.
- Bolton was so insane that G.W. had to wait until a Congressional Recess to appoint him.
- Bolton was welcomed with open arms into the Trump Admin
- Bolton is now a DNC socialist plant.
@thedailybeast
Giuliani said he delivered an unusual missive to Sen. Lindsey Graham, according to the lawyer of one of his ex-associates: a letter calling for sanctions on a host of Ukrainian government officials.https://trib.al/GuQf89C
One or two moderate Dems may really ruin it for everyone by giving credence to this "If Hunter Biden really was up to no good then Trump was right to do what he did" bullshit, huh? Fuck off, Manchin.
Even if Hunter was the dirtiest motherfucker on earth (and there's zero evidence he did anything wrong because Barr would've 100% revealed it by now) that doesn't make Trump's abuse of power magically go away.
Pretty sure Morrison and the Fox News lawyer we're republican witnesses
Lol outside of Hunter working for a fossil fuel board cuz he has a famous last name....
What the fuck did he do that was illegal? They didnt have to hire him to sit on the board
Outside of leaning on your name and nepotism i cant see what the whole corruption angle is. Outside of making money he didnt seem to be in a position to exert corruptive influence on the sales of fossil fuels lol
Like this whole thing is just them grasping for anything to draw attention away from how shitty Trump is
don't forget fleecing China for billions.Lol outside of Hunter working for a fossil fuel board cuz he has a famous last name....
What the fuck did he do that was illegal? They didnt have to hire him to sit on the board
Outside of leaning on your name and nepotism i cant see what the whole corruption angle is. Outside of making money he didnt seem to be in a position to exert corruptive influence on the sales of fossil fuels lol
Like this whole thing is just them grasping for anything to draw attention away from how shitty Trump is
#NEW poll of the 2020 Democratic primary from The Economist and YouGov:
% support among likely voters (chg vs last week):
Biden: 26 (-3)
Sanders: 24 (6)
Warren: 20 (-1)
Buttigieg: 7 (-1)
Klobuchar: 4 (0)
Bloomberg: 4 (-2)
Yang: 4 (0)
Gabbard: 3 (1)
Steyer: 1 (-2)
Patrick: 1 (0)
#NEW poll of the 2020 Democratic primary from The Economist and YouGov:
% support among likely voters (chg vs last week):
Biden: 26 (-3)
Sanders: 24 (6)
Warren: 20 (-1)
Buttigieg: 7 (-1)
Klobuchar: 4 (0)
Bloomberg: 4 (-2)
Yang: 4 (0)
Gabbard: 3 (1)
Steyer: 1 (-2)
Patrick: 1 (0)
#NEW poll of the 2020 Democratic primary from The Economist and YouGov:
% support among likely voters (chg vs last week):
Biden: 26 (-3)
Sanders: 24 (6)
Warren: 20 (-1)
Buttigieg: 7 (-1)
Klobuchar: 4 (0)
Bloomberg: 4 (-2)
Yang: 4 (0)
Gabbard: 3 (1)
Steyer: 1 (-2)
Patrick: 1 (0)
This is true ofc but as dems I'd put Hunter on the stand regardless. In the (not too unlikely) case Biden gets the nomination you have cleared the waves beforehand. And in the (unlikely) case he incriminates himself or his father the latter will not get the nomination. There is nothing to lose imo.Lol outside of Hunter working for a fossil fuel board cuz he has a famous last name....
What the fuck did he do that was illegal? They didnt have to hire him to sit on the board
Outside of leaning on your name and nepotism i cant see what the whole corruption angle is. Outside of making money he didnt seem to be in a position to exert corruptive influence on the sales of fossil fuels lol
Like this whole thing is just them grasping for anything to draw attention away from how shitty Trump is
I wonder what has bolstered Sanders so much in these last couple of weeks specifically?
In any case, I like to see Biden, Sanders, and Warren all somewhat in range of each other.
buckle up boys/girls - time to hit the panic button... I assume the last line of defense is rolling out Obama to take down Sanders.
Any moment now Obama's gonna take the stage to prevent a Sanders victory the neoliberal shill
No matter how many times I see it, those "sir"s make me laugh every time. It just never gets old.
So this is saying that its 1.Biden 2.Warren and 3. Sanders after second choices are done?
Warren is closer to winning than Sanders with these numbers.
No, because 2nd choices for supporters of the leading candidates (i.e. mainly Biden/Sanders, to a lesser extent Warren/Buttigieg in Iowa) don't really matter.So this is saying that its 1.Biden 2.Warren and 3. Sanders after second choices are done?
Warren is closer to winning than Sanders with these numbers.
Honestly, there were probably people saying both directions. He was seen as a potential liability by some.
Lol outside of Hunter working for a fossil fuel board cuz he has a famous last name....
What the fuck did he do that was illegal? They didnt have to hire him to sit on the board
Outside of leaning on your name and nepotism i cant see what the whole corruption angle is. Outside of making money he didnt seem to be in a position to exert corruptive influence on the sales of fossil fuels lol
Like this whole thing is just them grasping for anything to draw attention away from how shitty Trump is
Is Gardner just conceding his seat at this point? You would think you would at least try to appear more moderate given you are in a state that has voted blue in the last three cycles and appears to be getting bluer.