See, that's totally 100% not fair, and literally what the mods asked not to happen here.
That steak is raw and needs ketchup.
Ryan Knight 🌹 on Twitter
“Mike Bloomberg: “Black and latino males aged 16 to 25 don’t have jobs, don’t know how to find jobs...don’t know how to behave in the work place.” Centrists/Moderates: “I can’t believe Ryan Knight is saying he won’t support Bloomberg. He is so divisive.”https://t.co/p3LcG2aPYn”twitter.com
It's Bloomberg oppo-oclock.
I guess it's consistent with voters consistently liking Warren better than most of the candidates but not being many's first choice. I think the exit polls were saying Klobuchar did very well among people who decided in the last day/few days, presumably because of the debate. I guess Warren's supporters were like Bidens, relatively uncommitted people who liked her best but weren't very invested in the campaign. At the last moment some of them liked what Klobuchar had to say in the debate and decided to go with her even though they still like Warren.
I'm not sure this is quite true... for example this is what The Economist has at the moment on their model though I'm not sure exactly where their numbers are coming from.
I should have phrased what I meant better. Individually, she may not be each candidate's second choice, but in those matchups you can totally see how she's each "lanes" (if they exist?) 2nd choice.I guess it's consistent with voters consistently liking Warren better than most of the candidates but not being many's first choice. I think the exit polls were saying Klobuchar did very well among people who decided in the last day/few days, presumably because of the debate. I guess Warren's supporters were like Bidens, relatively uncommitted people who liked her best but weren't very invested in the campaign. At the last moment some of them liked what Klobuchar had to say in the debate and decided to go with her even though they still like Warren.
I'm not sure this is quite true... for example this is what The Economist has at the moment on their model though I'm not sure exactly where their numbers are coming from.
Wonder if anyone knows of a poll out there that's explicit about this.
Like I said above, I should have said it was "2nd choice by lane." (insofar as lanes exist, I guess.) I should have explained better. Hopefully the next post I made made it a bit clearer.
Just be honest and say you made up your mind and nothing's convincing you otherwise.
Made up my mind that the only anti vote blue no matter who people in my feed are Bernie fans?
I guess I don't really buy into this strict two lane race where it's Bernie/Warren/Steyer?/Yang? vs everyone else. I think the idea that people decide their candidate based on ideology is a bit overhyped, especially after I just saw Klobuchar apparently convert a big chunk of Warren's base in NH. And it's hard to imagine Buttigieg or Klobuchar picking up black support from Biden or Bloomberg were either of them to hypothetically drop out. The head to head polls posted earlier also make me question whether Sanders's ceiling isn't also just an assumption, like Trump's in 2016. Presumably everyone knows Bernie is farther left than the other candidates--you'd think they'd choose the moderate candidate in the head to head polls if it was such a big issue. I think there's a lot more factors at play here and everyone is focusing way too much on this one progressive vs moderate variable.
Nevada has like 36 Delegates.Bernie speaking in.. checks notes.. California!
Guess he figured he'd make a stop since it's nearby. They must be extremely confident in NV.
..I understand that. I was just surprised to see him there, when NV is right around the corner.
Super Tuesday isn't far away. All candidates have to multi task now.
It's fucking embarassing and makes me even sadder that pundits/media seemed to go full Klob devotion just because Warren started losing viability.
I think he was in Colorado yesterday? Seems like he's been moving through super Tuesday states. Or at least seems like that's what hes going to do.
Depends on the candidate. For example if Bloomberg wins I and many others won't vote for him.
For the most part? No. 2008 was way, way more grumpy than this. This is just mostly infighting stuff that will sort itself out. Bloomberg is the only potential hiccup, but he's not going to be the nominee so I wouldn't worry about it.
It makes sense, I'm just saying I was surprised to see him there over two weeks out.
