No, Veelk should be getting it on any platform he wants, which is the stance Veelk holds for everyone. The argument that X paid for it's creation and therefore X is justified in restricting it to X's platform doesn't work on Veelk since Veelk views exclusives as anti-consumer and doesn't care about any corporations, so Veelk wouldn't be siding with Nintendo or Microsoft or Sony. Ideally, Veelk thinks every game should be available on every possible platform that a game can be programmed onto, and that's all Veelk was expressing in wanting Bayonetta 2 to come to PC.
Honestly, people keep quoting me and giving me the "NiNtEnDo PaId FoR iT" line as if I've somehow not been aware of this from back when Bayonetta 2 was announced and became one of the reasons I purchased a Wii U. But as a consumer, I do not really care about Nintendo and I just want to future proof my games. So, I want it on PC. That Nintendo paid for it's development is not a sufficient reason for why it should be kept exclusive to it's platforms. And not that I said 'should', because I know that the current business model of gaming means that Nintendo owns the game as an IP, so it very well might not happen unless they work out a deal with Platinum. But companies would rather bury their IP's they own in the dirt, even if they don't have any other plans for them, which sucks. I don't think it should be this way. It would be an absolute good thing for us, real actual people, if Bayonetta 2 came to PC (or whatever platform you want it to be on) whereas the wants of corporations mean nothing to me.