oh my freaking god what
The full document's out.
Just a sampling of the gems contained within.
Nah, he seems to just literally reply to any comers. He's nothing if not diligent.Doucette is still going at it with Vic cultists on twitter, and I assume it's because he's trying to break the world record for consecutive body bagging.
Nah, he seems to just literally reply to any comers. He's nothing if not diligent.
The full document's out.
Just a sampling of the gems contained within.
omgThe full document's out.
Just a sampling of the gems contained within.
The full document's out.
Just a sampling of the gems contained within.
omg
"The defamatory parts of this tweet include the statement that "he gave almost all the women at my job the creeps." Clearly false as he had been working at this company for 15 years and had friends."
HAHAHA GET THE FUCK OUTTA HERE
omg
"The defamatory parts of this tweet include the statement that "he gave almost all the women at my job the creeps." Clearly false as he had been working at this company for 15 years and had friends."
HAHAHA GET THE FUCK OUTTA HERE
It's actually pretty wild. When the lawsuit was first published and I was going through that, I was thinking "well, there's no mention of breach of contract, so they're suing Funimation solely for vicarious liability. But which contracts are they alleging were interfered with? If it's not with Funimation, is it with the conventions?""I thought I didn't understand this case because it made no sense. I realize now I understand this case: it makes no sense" is like the perfect fucking koan
Probably got his MENSA membership by trying to steal candy from a baby, failing, and the baby's MENSA member mother feeling bad and giving him her card as a consolation prize.
Reading through stuff I believe they are trying to claim all future work as potential contracts that have been interfered with. Which as far as I know isn't really how you dispute a contract issue.It's actually pretty wild. When the lawsuit was first published and I was going through that, I was thinking "well, there's no mention of breach of contract, so they're suing Funimation solely for vicarious liability. But which contracts are they alleging were interfered with? If it's not with Funimation, is it with the conventions?"
But it wasn't until Doucette pointed out that they didn't specify and contracts that it occurs to me that maybe they were supposed to tell me that. I'm wracking my brain trying to figure out what the contracts they were talking about were because I was running on the assumption that the document I was reading wasn't just made by an incompetent.
Did...did I just witness an actual lawyer call on Kiwifarms?
I'm at a loss for words. Can he get disbarred for thsi?
"I thought I didn't understand this case because it made no sense. I realize now I understand this case: it makes no sense" is like the perfect fucking koan
I have tried debating with some of these people over the last month, I've tried everything asking questions from a position of neutrality to pointing out outright stupidity and they're fully impenetrable.
This was never about the truth, this was about protection from social progress. Misguided people who think equality equals oppression to the point they'll stake all they have on it.
This is not a fight you can win by changing their minds, all we can do is stamp it out where we can.
Also I can't stop laughing at the idiots responding to Doucette on twitter
I know the law and this guy is no super lawyer, do you even law bro?!
Snappy, I like it. I wonder if the loss in court will make any of them think.There was a quote mentioned in the Doucette tweet chain that sums this up perfectly. Funny enough, it comes from a lawyer, Edward Koch. "I can explain it to you, but I can't comprehend it for you."
I'd have to look through it again, but I believe they referred to both future and current contracts. I assumed that the current contracts were with conventions because no breach of contract with Funimation was alleged - but that's the thing, I had to make the assumption because it wasn't actually specified as far as I could see.Reading through stuff I believe they are trying to claim all future work as potential contracts that have been interfered with. Which as far as I know isn't really how you dispute a contract issue.
I'm in the same boat. I can't believe Greg is still going. It's practically a never ending stream of tweets and replies at this point.So I've popped into this thread routinely and always left it angry and sad. And yet I'd come back.
Boy, it finally paid off. This is phenomenal. Watching people try their bullshit on, like, actual lawyers is amazing.
I wonder if Vic is just watching this go down and just going through the most intense embarrassment. I really hope so.
HAHAHAHAHAHA what are you even doing blackface lawyer?! He just can't stop with his shitty ''threats''.
Your claim that he whispered something "sexual in nature" to you is purely fantasy and is false because you can't remember what he said.
Furthermore, you call Mr. Mignogna "a predator." This is defamatory and false because thre has never been a criminal action against M. Mignogna where a court determined that he was a predator to anyone.
This just implies that he is the worst kind of criminal and he clearly, as evidenced by thousands of fans who respect and admire him, is not the truth.
I laugued at a tweet (sadly can't find it now) that was saying something along the lines of ''You called my client a ''predator''. This is defamatory and false because you can't prove he is a extraterrestrial being that came down to earth to hunt humans''.I'm pretty sure "predator" isn't even a legal term. They're thinking of "sex offender".
Freudian slip.
I wonder if that guy just has "is false because" macro'd on his keyboard at this point.
This just implies that he is the worst kind of criminal and he clearly, as evidenced by thousands of fans who respect and admire him, is not the truth.
Lmao, Ty also updated his profile on their website to include defamation and tortious interference to his areas of practice. They weren't there back in April: https://web.archive.org/web/20190405152355/https://www.beardandharris.com/ty-beard.htmlso I don't know if this has been brought up before but the Lawyers are having a laugh that he copy and pasted the definition of defamation on his website from the cornell wiki
vs