It still amazes me that people will fall over themselves to defend a voice "actor" that's used the same voice for 10 years. He's not even good at it!
That's not actually a bad thing. Like, I remember seeing a Kevin Conroy (Batman, from the Animated Series) interview where he was saying that he has mixed feelings when fans come up to him and do "a Kevin Conroy voice", and suggest that they could do his job. He's like, "I'm not doing a Kevin Conroy voice, my voice is naturally Kevin Conroy. And you're forgetting the second part of "voice actor", which is "actor". You're clearly not acting, you're just speaking, with my voice."
If Vic Mignona only has one voice (his Vic Mignona voice), then that's fine, so long as he can act. And Vic might be a deplorable human being, but I'm not going to say I didn't enjoy watching Fullmetal Alchemist (I don't know if I will be able to enjoy watching it ever again though).
I kind of figured you were, but I wanted to make sure it was clear that she was clear.
that being said it's not surprising she is clear when Vic himself admitted the incident took place, and they seemingly found footage of it happening, and despite what Vic's lawyer team seems to think... it's not defamation if it's true even if it is damaging to your client's reputation..
They didn't find footage of Vic pulling Jamie Marchi's hair. In his video deposition, they asked Vic if he ever pulled her hair. He confessed to it, and then did a pantomime of the physical motions he made with his hands when he pulled her hair. But then (still in his video deposition) he claimed that from his point of view, it wasn't sexual.
Then in his written sworn deposition, he did a 180 and claimed that he never pulled her hair. It never happened.
Then while suing Jamie Marchi for falsely saying that he pulled her hair, the defense showed a looping video of Vic doing the hand-motions while he literally confessed to pulling her hair. So the judge threw that part of Vic's claim out the window.