Scalping has been an issue for a long time, but it's gotten even worse over the last year, especially due to COVID-related production problems and shortages. I understand that new products like the PS5 and Xbox systems are in high demand and are more likely to sell out in general, but that doesn't mean the average consumer should feel like they have to resort to paying higher prices or get comfortable with the idea of waiting a year or two for enough stock to be available for purchase. And as long as demand remains high while shortages continue, scalpers are going to continue to profit.
That being said, what's the solution? Would a ban on scalping actually be beneficial, or would it have unintended consequences? I can see scenarios in which a ban might be harmful to some businesses, like local video game retailers, though I'm sure an argument could be made that they don't have to and shouldn't be scalping new and in-demand items. There's also other factors to consider, like the idea that new and unopened items are expected to be worth more money as time goes on and machines/games are no longer being manufactured or printed. I think that's an acceptable and reasonable expectation for people who look at certain items as collector's pieces and an investment. And then, I also know it's hard to argue that you can't tell someone what to charge for an item if someone is willing to pay for it. It's tough.
Personally, I think a time-limited ban on scalping would be an interesting proposal. For example, selling an item for more than MSRP + tax would be illegal for a set amount of time (1-2 years). Or, perhaps it could be illegal as long as that item is still actively being produced for sale by the company. I'm not sure how this would practically work -- could retailers list something on their product pages about more stock coming in the future? Could companies be more upfront about more stock coming to retailers?
Thoughts?
That being said, what's the solution? Would a ban on scalping actually be beneficial, or would it have unintended consequences? I can see scenarios in which a ban might be harmful to some businesses, like local video game retailers, though I'm sure an argument could be made that they don't have to and shouldn't be scalping new and in-demand items. There's also other factors to consider, like the idea that new and unopened items are expected to be worth more money as time goes on and machines/games are no longer being manufactured or printed. I think that's an acceptable and reasonable expectation for people who look at certain items as collector's pieces and an investment. And then, I also know it's hard to argue that you can't tell someone what to charge for an item if someone is willing to pay for it. It's tough.
Personally, I think a time-limited ban on scalping would be an interesting proposal. For example, selling an item for more than MSRP + tax would be illegal for a set amount of time (1-2 years). Or, perhaps it could be illegal as long as that item is still actively being produced for sale by the company. I'm not sure how this would practically work -- could retailers list something on their product pages about more stock coming in the future? Could companies be more upfront about more stock coming to retailers?
Thoughts?