"Productive" for them, it let them sleep at night easier hopefully lolCorrection: there are no productive battles in the console warz
"Productive" for them, it let them sleep at night easier hopefully lolCorrection: there are no productive battles in the console warz
Correction: there are no productive battles in the console warz
Not calling Jason a shill but him writing about NDs work culture doesn't make him not a shill. It makes him a Journalist. I'm honestly confused why he decided on doing Sony PR work for them, before and after the reveal fighting against the cpu,gpu, ram etc. I'm sure if the SSD is this magic sauce that is the biggest change in 20 years Sony/devs will show that.
I just want to know if the devs reaching out are first part or third party? Because if it's first party it makes sense that they would be excited about ps5 given the ability for them to fully utilise it but for their party devs who make pc ports how many years until you can say the 5gb/s base SSD is a minimum requirement? A long time in my opinion.
so maybe 4 or 5 games a generation will get to leverage this amazing drive I guess
I literally did the opposite. He's far from a shill, I'm just confused why he's invested in sonys prYou literally called him a 'shill', but hid it in a shitty double-negative.
So, you're saying he's a shill?
Oh hey would you look at that:
Andrea Pessino on Twitter
“Dollar bet: within a year from its launch gamers will fully appreciate that the PlayStation 5 is one of the most revolutionary, inspired home consoles ever designed, and will feel silly for having spent energy arguing about "teraflops" and other similarly misunderstood specs. 😘”twitter.com
I literally did the opposite. He's far from a shill, I'm just confused why he's invested in sonys pr
Again, the hype that Jason is pushing should easily be supported by the titles Sony reveals. In less than a year all of this chatter about the 'most innovative console in 20 years' will have the software to show the true potential, or not.
I just hope Jason isn't as defensive in a year from now if the software doesn't blow minds like he's insinuating. For now, watching him go all in for Sony is amusing.
Pretty much the reason I barely can stand the gaming side anymore. It all seems so silly to behave this way for games. I've owned every system at one point and other than a few exclusives here and there, the experiences weren't all that drastically different either way.Thanks Jason. Fanboys in general are pathetic ("gamers" especially). They're always twistings someone's words in order to fit their own pointless agenda.
Oh hey would you look at that:
Andrea Pessino on Twitter
“Dollar bet: within a year from its launch gamers will fully appreciate that the PlayStation 5 is one of the most revolutionary, inspired home consoles ever designed, and will feel silly for having spent energy arguing about "teraflops" and other similarly misunderstood specs. 😘”twitter.com
It feels like you're making a very big mountain out of a molehill, he's having a pop at Sony for messing up their message and passing on what some devs are saying about the tech. it doesn't scream all in for Sony to me.
I literally did the opposite. He's far from a shill, I'm just confused why he's invested in sonys pr
It feels like you're making a very big mountain out of a molehill, he's having a pop at Sony for messing up their message and passing on what some devs are saying about the tech. it doesn't scream all in for Sony to me.
He was commenting what he thought of the presentation. What is wrong with you?I think he just should have stayed out of it.
It is simply not a good look for him.
I think he just should have stayed out of it.
It is simply not a good look for him.
i think this has more to do with what he said about both consoles being more powerful than the 2080, and aiming to be over 10.7 tflops. the ps5 might actually be more powerful than the 2080 but what sony showed yesterday doesnt show it which calls into question his reporting which in turns makes this personal for him... whether he would like to admit it or not. i thought it was curious why he was so obsessed with our spec thread calling us out on twitter for being console warriors just for being interested in knowing the tflops count. we have never treated him with disrespect in that thread, so it was pretty demoralizing seeing him call everyone in that thread a rabid fanboy. but this makes a bit more sense because Cerny's terrible presentation might have actually undersold the power of the system and thus his reporting of a powerful system. remember, he had just tweeted some dev's opinion that it was the most exciting hardware in 20 years. his reputation is on the line. thats why hes invested in sony's pr.I literally did the opposite. He's far from a shill, I'm just confused why he's invested in sonys pr
I don't think Jason cares necessarily about Sony so much as he's against this idea of teraflops meaning everything, especially considering how much he got bugged about it over the past year or so and in that case, Sony is on the shorter end of that stick this time around.
If you want to look at his true crusade, it's pretty clear that he's intent on finding ways to expose crunch and ending those practices. The level of effort with the PS5 ain't close to that.
I will begrudgingly admit that you are correct and that this is indeed part of it.i think this has more to do with what he said about both consoles being more powerful than the 2080, and aiming to be over 10.7 tflops. the ps5 might actually be more powerful than the 2080 but what sony showed yesterday doesnt show it which calls into question his reporting which in turns makes this personal for him... whether he would like to admit it or not. i thought it was curious why he was so obsessed with our spec thread calling us out on twitter for being console warriors just for being interested in knowing the tflops count. we have never treated him with disrespect in that thread, so it was pretty demoralizing seeing him call everyone in that thread a rabid fanboy. but this makes a bit more sense because Cerny's terrible presentation might have actually undersold the power of the system and thus his reporting of a powerful system. remember, he had just tweeted some dev's opinion that it was the most exciting hardware in 20 years. his reputation is on the line. thats why hes invested in sony's pr.
that said, you arent fooling anyone, everyone here including you, me, jason and everyone else in between you were trying to paint him as a sony shill without actually saying it. the guy didnt even get an early briefing on the specs like IGN, gamespot and DF did. he's likely been blacklisted by sony.
I'd love to know who actually says that. Of course they aren't everything. It's still a valid indicator for performance.
What's bugging me is this, people are actually saying not to trust the spec sheets. Thats absolutely baffling to me.
I'd love to know who actually says that. Of course they aren't everything. It's still a valid indicator for performance.
What's bugging me is this, people are actually saying not to trust the spec sheets. Thats absolutely baffling to me.
But are they saying *not to trust* the spec sheets? Or are they saying that taking the spec sheets at face value don't tell the whole story or give a conclusive indicator of performance/graphics/etc.? Because I have only ever seen the latter.
To make yet another terrible analogy on this forum I think with the TF thing it's kind of like in real life where just because you see a BIG guy doesn't mean he's STRONG. A buddy of mine was a bouncer for a while but still looks pretty big, and he says once he stopped working out he lost most of his muscle mass and it's just flab now, and that he can't lift what he used to be able to lift. He can still lift more than MY skinny ass, but if I worked out and was even a sport/trim looking thin guy it's possible that I could lift close to what he can currently lift now- maybe even more.
He was commenting what he thought of the presentation. What is wrong with you?
I'm just not seeing the issue, this isn't international diplomacy and the Cuban missile crisis.
It's electronic tat.
Jesus, i think i'm finally becoming old.
Oh hey would you look at that:
Andrea Pessino on Twitter
“Dollar bet: within a year from its launch gamers will fully appreciate that the PlayStation 5 is one of the most revolutionary, inspired home consoles ever designed, and will feel silly for having spent energy arguing about "teraflops" and other similarly misunderstood specs. 😘”twitter.com
How is TF a misunderstood bullet point on a spec sheet though? Even Cerny brought up flops in his presentation saying GCN flops != RDNA2 flops. Why mention it if it's meaningless? Why upclock the GPU to get closer to XSX if it's meaningless and unnecessarily puts strain on thermals?
Even if we forget TF for a second, the PS5 has slower RAM. It has a slower CPU, it has less CUs (which with AMD are linked to RT performance). Are those meaningless too? I get that devs want to defuse the situation for Sony since they themselves did a poor job but this whole "TF don't matter anymore" thing is a very sudden shift when it was all everyone ever talked about. We have direct proof that TF is a good indicator for performance through years of testing (by digital foundry and other sites). Why the sudden shift?
I'm over here just happy that both consoles look about as good as possible this time around. In '13 both had legit bad CPUs, and the OG X1 was further hobbled by weak GPU and memory bandwidth.
Gen8 was like a 5/10 vs a 7/10 console offering.
This looks more like a 9/10 vs a 9.5/10 pair of console offerings, nobody should be disappointed, considering the BOM and value involved. I have an OC 9900KS and OC 3900X pair of rigs with VRR displays and 2080ti AMP Extreme and Titan RTX, and am still pretty impressed with what these consoles represent on a value level (assuming $400-$600 low to high price ranges).
But people gonna argue and unwillingly show their lack of understanding in subjective matters to try to tell everyone else what they think is better. When at the end of the day these things are for personal entertainment and enjoyment. All the specs in the world don't change the fun factor for someone else, which is probably why the Switch is so successful despite basically being a potato. Great games for those that enjoy them are the real story anyway, though raising the hardware bar is welcome in making new things possible along the way.
Game and let game.
Ah i forgot about the 10.7 thing it makes sense now, i respect him for putting his sources and guesswork out there don't think people should hold that over him. Was he wrong sure? But obviously he heard good things about the system that is way more than capable regardless of its tf count. And for your last bit no one calling Jason a shill.i think this has more to do with what he said about both consoles being more powerful than the 2080, and aiming to be over 10.7 tflops. the ps5 might actually be more powerful than the 2080 but what sony showed yesterday doesnt show it which calls into question his reporting which in turns makes this personal for him... whether he would like to admit it or not.
I'd love to know who actually says that. Of course they aren't everything. It's still a valid indicator for performance.
What's bugging me is this, people are actually saying not to trust the spec sheets. Thats absolutely baffling to me.
Where is the partiality in saying that Sony built a very good machine and their presentation undersold it to the general consumer? He didn't say anything bad about Xbox. Get over your fanboy glasses.What is wrong with you? I am not referring to the initial comments rather the extending discourse that followed. Rightly or wrongly, it gave the impression of partiality.
I'd love to know who actually says that. Of course they aren't everything. It's still a valid indicator for performance.
What's bugging me is this, people are actually saying not to trust the spec sheets. Thats absolutely baffling to me.
They are telling us not to take cold hard data at face value because.... why? None of them explain in detail why.
and that has to be one of the worst analogies I have ever seen on this site.
i think this has more to do with what he said about both consoles being more powerful than the 2080, and aiming to be over 10.7 tflops. the ps5 might actually be more powerful than the 2080 but what sony showed yesterday doesnt show it which calls into question his reporting which in turns makes this personal for him... whether he would like to admit it or not. i thought it was curious why he was so obsessed with our spec thread calling us out on twitter for being console warriors just for being interested in knowing the tflops count. we have never treated him with disrespect in that thread, so it was pretty demoralizing seeing him call everyone in that thread a rabid fanboy. but this makes a bit more sense because Cerny's terrible presentation might have actually undersold the power of the system and thus his reporting of a powerful system. remember, he had just tweeted some dev's opinion that it was the most exciting hardware in 20 years. his reputation is on the line. thats why hes invested in sony's pr.
that said, you arent fooling anyone, everyone here including you, me, jason and everyone else in between you were trying to paint him as a sony shill without actually saying it. the guy didnt even get an early briefing on the specs like IGN, gamespot and DF did. he's likely been blacklisted by sony.
I'm not sure what this is supposed to mean? A studio of former Sony developers praising the PS5 in a series of tweets? Color me surprised.
Sure, they haven't explained why, but considering they are developers of videogames, I'm going to trust their opinion over someone on a forum or comments section- I'll even trust them over DF considering DF doesn't make videogames, they measure metrics of videogames performance and make videos about it.
Or you could trust the spec sheets released by Sony and MS. Weird I know.
Or you could trust the spec sheets released by Sony and MS. Weird I know.
He's trying to help explain something that he thinks people aren't fully understanding. That falls within the purview of journalism and editorial, does it not?I literally did the opposite. He's far from a shill, I'm just confused why he's invested in sonys pr
Specs sheets never tell the whole story since day 1 this isn't different for either system. Both have custom blocks tools/secret sauces.The specs sheet doesn't tell you how all that work. The fact is, Sony is making some new things, so it's not a 1 to 1 comparison.