Yeah, in my 20s and I can't stand most modern pop, I mainly just listen to 60s-70s.Lol at all these people saying ok boomer. I am in my 30s. And you wont hear me saying music from the 50s, 60s, 70s etc was bland. This isn't about celebrating music from when I grew up.
Both your definition of pop and the definition "music that charts" are valid ways of thinking about the genre. But when talking about what's actually broadly culturally relevant, as the OP and others seem to be, the second is more appropriate.Pop Music is a genre with sub-genres. Pop music isn't just "music that charts", it's a defined umbrella genre. These artists are everything from synthpop to art pop to hypongogic pop to electropop to glitch pop to baroque pop to futurepop to progressive pop to power pop and so on and so on.
If you're not familiar with genres and stuff that doesn't make any of this music not pop, it's just a lack of knowledge of how music is categorized.
minor edit: also this isn't a new modern thing as well, even something like Pet Sounds is a combination of baroque pop, sunshine pop, progressive pop, and psyche pop.
Had no clue that this was such a popular song worldwide, somehow thought it would have just been popular in a couple of Euro countries.This is currently the most popular Pop song in the world: https://youtu.be/q0hyYWKXF0Q
How are we feeling OP?
Literally who are any of these acts? I think OP is talking about top 40 music. Which definitely sucks.Lower in quality is pretty subjective. There is plenty of good pop in the current era (Slayyyter, Black Dresses, TR/ST, Solange, ABRA, George Clanton, The Beths, Charly Bliss, Kero Kero Bonito, Rina Sawayama, Perfume Genius, Crying, Lemon Demon, Kimbra, Weyes Blood, FKA Twigs, Charli XCX, 3776, Glass Beach, Yeule, literally dozens and dozens of others)
I think it's maybe more you just aren't familiar with a lot of music? Not trying to be condescending but so much good music comes out every year in all genres and I usually only hear "man current music sucks" from people who don't actually listen to a lot of new music.
Literally who are any of these acts? I think OP is talking about top 40 music. Which definitely sucks.
no, see, that doesn't count because it doesn't use the specific definition of pop music i want, which is "stuff i hear on the radio that i don't like"
anyway, stream king princess's new hit album cheap queen
Except those three are not really pop, by genre or top 40 definition. I would argue Sheryl Crow isn't either.Off the top of my head I could only name Tori Amos and Melissa Etheridge. Or maybe Jewel like 90% of the time? I dunno.
None of those people were as big as Britney Spears, Christina Aguilera, Madonna, etc.
edit: forgot Sheryl Crow but again not as big of a name at all
I don't know why you're hand wavingno, see, that doesn't count because it doesn't use the specific definition of pop music i want, which is "stuff i hear on the radio that i don't like"
anyway, stream king princess's new hit album cheap queen
Nobody actually likes Pop Music, everyone collectively tolerates it so shopping malls get away with playing it as white noise as you're looking for vegetables, also applicable for work spaces where everyone tolerates it equally while not playing their own taste over the speakers. ;P
I don't know why you're hand waving
I would make the claim that top 40 music is different from pop music.
Some music is definitely min/maxed to be as profitable as possible. That's just capitalism. The songs we see topping billboards Have been engineered by a team of people to be drilled into the minds of the listener.
Of course not all top 40 music is like this, but I would wager that acts like Taylor Swift, Shawn Mendes, Billie Eilish, etc definitely fall into this category.
smaller acts may use musical conventions that superstar acts use (and often times use them better) which qualifies them as pop music, but I would not qualify them as top 40 contenders.
Excuse any typos/grammatical errors, on mobile
Except those three are not really pop, by genre or top 40 definition. I would argue Sheryl Crow isn't either.
I agree, I was trying to strengthen your point in fact since I agree with it.I'm sure they've all had at least one song in the top 40.
But you're just strengthening my point that there was a lack of non-sexualized female pop/top 40 musical talent in the 80s and 90s if even those don't count.
Huh? In what world? Please name any pop singer from the 80s/90s that was famous and didn't have alot of sex and sexuality in their hit songs besides Debbie Gibson maybe? Wilson Phillips? Are we really going there?
The study sample consisted of the top 40 songs of Billboard Year End Hot 100 single songs for every 5 years from 1971 to 2011 (N = 360). There was a linear decrease over time in the proportion of songs with a love theme and in the proportion of songs with a combination of lust and love themes. In contrast, there was a significant increase in the proportion of songs with a theme focusing on lust in the absence of love.
I don't think we had something like Hounds of Love by Kate Bush in the last two decades, but pop music overall got a lot better. 2019 alone was amazing.
I kinda feel this way too. 90s and 00s music seemed too try-hard, IMO. Not all music, but the ones that did seemed like they were compensating for something they didn't believe were a part of 80s music. It was like, "Aw fuck it! 80s was too friendly and unoffensive, it's time to get ugly and NASTAY!"Are you sure it's more sexualized? The 90s and 2000s were pretty much filled with that shit, doesn't seem much different to me now in that regard.
It's immaculate from start to finish. She deserves all the acclaim she's getting.Exactly what I was thinking of. FKA Twigs destroys this notion. Fantastic album too.
Music revenue has also never recovered since the fall of music sales. Streaming has brought it up a little, but it's still a far smaller number than when people bought physical records. With less money to be made, there's a lower desire for a risk.So easy to access different types of music than it used to be that gotta do mass appeal drivil because if you don't you won't be making much money as tastes are too spread out across the other stuff as people don't need settle for next closest thing anymore. And it has of course been run into the ground. It not just pop that suffered this.
I kinda feel this way too. 90s and 00s music seemed too try-hard, IMO. Not all music, but the ones that did seemed like they were compensating for something they didn't believe were a part of 80s music. It was like, "Aw fuck it! 80s was too friendly and unoffensive, it's time to get ugly and NASTAY!"
pop music writ large is bad, I listen to REAL music like johnny cash (but not other country music, which is bad)
I miss the good pop stars like Al B. Sure! and Jody Watley