Sid Meier has been doing it for over 20 years.
IT IS? LMAO
IT IS? LMAO
It can't just be famous game devs, I think it's game devs who kinda have their own signature style of games that aren't really like anything else. So not Cory Barlog or Neil Druckmann. The "auteurs" if you will.
Suda51, Yoko Taro, Miyazaki and Fumito Ueda are the ones I can think of. Maybe Kamiya and Sakurai.
See this one is weird for me because Mikami for the longest time has been all about raising young talent and giving them their shots. Even some games associated with him that he produced (vanquish, god hand) were actually directed by other people. I think Mikami would be more in favor of putting those names in front of his
Please come back later, that's a topic i would love to discuss, i mean, we see guys like Druckman, Myazaki or Barlog, they are pretty much a seal of quality, just like Tarantino or Scorcese. And of course we see the "newcomers" like Suda, Yoko Taro, etc. I still don't see this like a ego thing and more like a comercial thing.Well yes and no;
There are plenty of names in movies that aren't in the public awareness because no matter how good of a gaffer you are, people can't see the effect so they don't usually care. In both games and movies, however, the director, writer, and producer are in a much higher creative position so their effects both good and bad are more visible to the end user.
I'd love to go more comprehensive with this answer but I'm writing this in between rounds of counter strike lol
The problem is that Suda has had his name stapled to like six or seven projects now that he didn't really have all that much to do with, diluting its power.
That's what i mean, i would do the same for a Cory Barlog game or a Neil Druckman game.I would buy "A Yoko Taro game" without even looking at the trailer.
I read that interview, and i know is not just an ego thing, dude does a lot os stuff from behind the scenes. I am more curious in a comercial level if people would buy a game just because it has director X involved with or not.I don't think OP actually read his interview on what Kojima considers "a Hideo Kojima game". It's not just every game he's involved with...
See this one is weird for me because Mikami for the longest time has been all about raising young talent and giving them their shots. Even some games associated with him that he produced (vanquish, god hand) were actually directed by other people. I think Mikami would be more in favor of putting those names in front of his
Oh I absolutely think it's a commercial thing in most cases, that's why names like Tarantino and Tim Burton get stapled to products that they only had minor roles in creating. People will absolutely go out and see a movie just because of the name printed on the poster.Please come back later, that's a topic i would love to discuss, i mean, we see guys like Druckman, Myazaki or Barlog, they are pretty much a seal of quality, just like Tarantino or Scorcese. And of course we see the "newcomers" like Suda, Yoko Taro, etc. I still don't see this like a ego thing and more like a comercial thing.
Maybe not arrogant enough but If Miyamoto did and had his name plastered on it as the father of mario i bet noone would be against it and it would sell gang busters.I don't think either of them are arrogant enough (or, let's be real - as singularly in charge of projects enough) to claim that. Especially nowadays.
He direct gow 2 and the new gow as well.Oh I absolutely think it's a commercial thing in most cases, that's why names like Tarantino and Tim Burton get stapled to products that they only had minor roles in creating. People will absolutely go out and see a movie just because of the name printed on the poster.
People already mentioned that this has happened several times with Suda 51, but I feel like I'm games it's harder to fake like that because since it's more hands on, it's easier to tell when it's not the case.
Also am I mistaken or did Corey Barlog not actually work on the new GoW? I know he didn't direct most of them after I want to say 2, but I haven't played the new one or really looked into it so I don't know if he came back for it
I'm sorry I had it mixed up, the guy I'm thinking of was the Designer on those, he directed RE: Code Veronica https://www.destructoid.com/god-hand-and-vanquish-designer-is-a-farmer-now-270883.phtml?
Mikami directed both Vanquish and God Hand.
Are you getting mixed up with Suda51? Shadows of the Damned, Killer is Dead, Lollipop Chainsaw, No More Heroes 2; they were all games directed by other people.
Ohhh ok I was wondering why the name kept popping up
Maybe not arrogant enough but If Miyamoto did and had his name plastered on it as the father of mario i bet noone would be against it and it would sell gang busters.
Pretty much good lord.
Does every film director have a big ego? I always see their names on the screen when I watch a movie.
Games aren't movies.Does every film director have a big ego? I always see their names on the screen when I watch a movie.
Is Sid Meier even involved with Civ anymore?
I don't think either of them are arrogant enough (or, let's be real - as singularly in charge of projects enough) to claim that. Especially nowadays.
I'm sorry I had it mixed up, the guy I'm thinking of was the Designer on those, he directed RE: Code Veronica https://www.destructoid.com/god-hand-and-vanquish-designer-is-a-farmer-now-270883.phtml
.....that said, lend me ¥50,000
As far as I know they both have someone who direct the work as a whole and someone who do a part of the work.
Miyazaki probably should have did this starting with at least Dark Souls, his name would be strong by now.
Why is it ok if other mediums' artists do this but not this one?