Which The Witcher 3 DLC should I play?

[Nezacant]

I refuse to to vote for just one. You need to play both.

 

[BFIB]

Not to derail the OP's topic but I'm really psyched to play Witcher 3 on switch. I have it on PS4 but I haven't completed the download content yet.

 

[hydruxo]

You should play both eventually, but I'd go with Hearts of Stone. It's legitimately the best DLC I've ever played for a game. Great story and characters, memorable quests, excellent bosses. Absolutely a must play.

 

[Ivory Samoan]

The only correct answer is both...but if you must choose, HoS has the better story and is faster to finish.

Sacrilige, though, to leave out BW though ;)

 

[BizzyBum]

You will make time for both.

Click to shrink...

This.

You're a mad man and heavily missing out if you don't play both, OP.

 

[m_dorian]

Both.



HoS first and BaW second.

 

[Kubricks]

Heart of Stone, THEN Blood and Wine.
You can thank us later.

 

[c0Zm1c]

Hearts of Stone if time is the issue.

 

[Doctoglethorpe]

Blood and Wine is more like an expansion, like a mini-sequel, than a dlc. Whole new huge area to explore. It's also full of (good) fan service cause it's fully aware that it's the last chapter in Geralts story and wants to celebrate that and leave you with a wink and smile instead of something more serious like the base games ending. I just can't see someone loving the game but not getting that conclusion it's so perfect.

If you played mass effect, it's like the Citadel dlc. A loving farewell.

 

[Joco]

You will make time for both.

Click to shrink...

And one and done. If you only choose to play one, you're doing it wrong.

 

[Rackham]

you tell me OP