I'm not trying to be a smart ass but I wonder how much of the hate for the Prequel fights is just an extension of hate for the Prequels themselves?
Like I don't know I don't see these critiques for over the top Wuxia style fighting often otherwise. Like if people watched this outside of Star Wars would you till dislike it? Just wondering.
I like the over the top fights but the slower paced sequel fights are great too. Can't really say which I prefer.
I think the disconnect is that not what lightsaber battles were.
Your right. If it were a generic action movie with out the legacy of what lightsaber duels looked like to two generations of fans, it probably be viewed much better. People do like wuxia style action, look at the Matrix for example.
But it's not Star Wars, where the original duels were more akin to Japanese movie samurai fights.
The fight choreography is serviceable for wuxia style. But it is just odd in Star Wars.
It would be like if Ant Man suddenly started suddenly doing Capoeria and taking down tons of guys that waym
Or Worf on Star Trek suddenly took a sumo wrestler pose and tackled a Borg with a series of sumo strikes.
It takes you out of what has been established (Antman uses generic self defense with his growing and shrinking powers. Worf uses batleth, phasers and Kung fu like palm strikes) and makes you go "Wait what?"
I was 19 when the Phantom Menace came out and I remember to this day how I reacted to the Darth Maul v Qui Gon/Obi Wan duel. "Wow this is so cool. Wow... Um... Why did Obi-Wan fight like this against Vader."
And I did appreciate the fight from an artistic standpoint. The choreography is solid. But it's not Star Wars. At least not to me.
That isn't to say there isn't any place for more complex or stylistic duels. But they have to be in the realm of the already established. It's why the Obiwan v Maul on Tattoonie in Rebels works. It has the style of the prelude but the weight and deliberate motion of the OT.