I mean I still think you're a little off kilter with upping the playback speed on YouTube, it is a bit weird. You might just need to look into genres that mess with that stuff and make music like that. Though it's difficult to make any recommendationsThank you for this post ❤ Some people are just acting kinda shocking in here lol
The pitch isn't even being altered, just the speed. I prefer music to be faster-paced. That's all it is :-( but again, thanks
Thank you for this post ❤️ Some people are just acting kinda shocking in here lol
The pitch isn't even being altered, just the speed. I prefer music to be faster-paced. That's all it is :-( but again, thanks
listen to genres that are fast then?
djing is like remixing a track on the spot, thats different to what the op does. same with producing musicI certainly wouldn't alter speed on YouTube or anything like that, bit detrimental to the audio quality.
The idea that so many are so thoroughly against the concept of altering the pitch or speed of tracks is quite amusing considering I would hope/assume a good number of you have listened to or attended DJ sets or listened to mixes. You've likely already enjoyed music "not how it was intended to be heard" and either didn't realise it liked it anyway.
Having made a bit of jungle, breaks, and put together mixes, altering music in pitch, tempo, or arrangement is a pretty standard and fun thing to do
Lighten up
Oh I appreciate that, I'm just not as precious about these things given I've spent so much time messing with music, picking it to pieces, and putting it back together.djing is like remixing a track on the spot, thats different to what the op does. same with producing music
You've awoken something in me, OP. I would just like you to know that.Edit: DOING THIS ON YOUTUBE DOES NOT CHANGE THE PITCH I'm not crazy bye
For me, I'd say it's 85% 1.25x speed, 10% normal speed, and 5% 1.5x speed.
I usually listen to classical music (that isn't grossly overplayed, generic-sounding, or whimsical) or orchestrated video game soundtracks, though I listen to my fair share of pop songs (and their remixed versions) and I usually speed those up too.
I just find normal speed to usually be very slow
Any friends I've asked say they don't do this so I'm wondering who on here does
Thank u for reading
Other than listening to ... and the Chipmunks album slowed down, I wouldn't ever consider seriously listening to any music at a different speed, no.
Wow, that actually sounds pretty cool. Like some weird post punk band
But who offers a Waltz at supersonic speed?
So no DJ mixes or DJ performances for you then? Just in case it ruins the "intended experience"?I can never understand people who do this sort of thing as it completely ruins the intended experience.
For things like podcasts I can understand (even though I would still find it distracting) but for music/films/tv it will affect the pacing and impact of everything to a point that you are watching something completely different.
Directors will decide how long of a dramatic pause or on the speed at which some dialogue should be spoken and that's all decided on to serve a purpose so having it spend up will just ruin that impact.
Anyone who believes otherwise is simply lying to themselves.
But thats completely different, thats intentionally changing the sample to create a new product.So no DJ mixes or DJ performances for you then? Just in case it ruins the "intended experience"?
But thats completely different, thats intentionally changing the sample to create a new product.
Watching a film at 1.5 speed isnt the same as a DJ, its just someone not wanting to spend as much time as the intended length and in turn changing the actual product to something other than was intended.
To use the DJ analogy I would say a directors cut/fan cut would be more fitting since you could chop and change scenes but the moment the viewer starts changing the playback speed is the moment you are taking control instead of viewing it as intended.
But DJs constantly change the playback speed of records, but they may just be mixing songs together rather Han completely mashing up or cutting itBut thats completely different, thats intentionally changing the sample to create a new product.
Watching a film at 1.5 speed isnt the same as a DJ, its just someone not wanting to spend as much time as the intended length and in turn changing the actual product to something other than was intended.
To use the DJ analogy I would say a directors cut/fan cut would be more fitting since you could chop and change scenes but the moment the viewer starts changing the playback speed is the moment you are taking control instead of viewing it as intended.
But again, the whole point of a DJ that does mixes/adjusts speed is that they are doing so to create a new product that is different to the base version.But DJs constantly change the playback speed of records, but they may just be mixing songs together rather Han completely mashing up or cutting it
I just find the "intended experience" argument completely bogus - at least with regards to music. It's entirely self limiting and abitrary in my opinion
I still say upping the speed on playback on YouTube is a bit silly, but I'm mostly just reacting to the unwarranted venom aimed at the OP when framed around artistic intentions. It's bad because it has a noticeable impact on audio quality
Right, but how much that matters, and how much derision it deserves is far less significant than so many are making out.But again, the whole point of a DJ that does mixes/adjusts speed is that they are doing so to create a new product that is different to the base version.
Also im not sure how you can call 'intended experience' bogus when musicians spend tonnes of time and money in producing their product to a specific way they intend. Why would they keep doing takes or hiring producers to get certain sounds etc if they didn't have an intended experience?
You are free to prefer it if it is sped up/cut etc. but you just need to realise that you are enjoying something different to what was intended and not act like you are experiencing the same thing as everyone else because the very act or changing the speed is enough of a change to affect how it impacts the listener.
I mean yeah, ultimately its down to the individual on how they consume content and if they are happy to do it sped up then that's fine for them.Right, but how much that matters, and how much derision it deserves is far less significant than so many are making out.
There are musicians out there who are more concerned with how their art is consumed, but I would suggest the majority are mostly making sure they have a high quality product.
Like, the intended experience for classical music is clearly live in a theatre, auditorium, etc. Doesn't stop them putting the music on CDs in as high quality as their budget allows to sell some product
Reggae/dub artists put out records and CDs, but really that music needs to be listened to on massive speaker stacks in the right environment
People getting ruffled feathers because someone's not listening the way they think they should seems a little silly to me