Studies lol. I'm with you but I am over "studies" lol.
Be careful whom you distrust. It is through studies specially RCT that medicine advances with some degree of certainty.
Milk is actually bad for you. Most of the "positive " studies and promotions are dairy funded
Correction. Milk is recommended for all people that like it, it is a very good and complete food. Obviously positive studies can be dairy funded just like negatives studies can be "alternative milks" funded; this doesn't make the non funded by does industries fake.
If you think that's bad wait until you see the flip flopping on eggs and wine.
I don't think wine changed much. egg did change a bit due to precaution. Here is a black and white resume on what changed in the last few years, it is a bit simplified but i think:
Wine- Most studies correlate wine with good effects and bad effects. You can easily understand why: wine is made of grapes and alcohol. Alcohol is always bad for your health while most of the grape is good for you (it is a fruit after all). SO the studies that focus on endpoints that are caused by alcohol will show wine as "bad" (like hepatic cancer and myocardiopathy) while studies that focus on the fruit benefits will show that wine is "good".
Egg - a few decades ago we found that people got cardiovascular disease (CVD) due to cholesterol. At the time most doctors assumed that any food that raised cholesterol would probably be bad for you, After all a drug that reduces cholesterol decreases the risk of a CVD. As our understanding of how cholesterol is "absorbed" into the vascular walls we began to question that knowledge, as such studies began comparing people with high cholesterol intake with those that have low cholesterol intake. The result was that most cholesterol rich foods like eggs raise both the LDL cholesterol and the HDL cholesterol in the same proportion; which meant that the risk of CVD didn't change significantly from the diet. We now know that it is the change of ratio on the LDL VS HDL cholesterol that increases the risk, and not just high values of cholesterol.
Milk is fucking gross.
Think about it...
Keep in mind, doctors know little to nothing about nutrition.
Source - family of 7 doctors (who are all fat, if that matters).
Depends on our interest of area. You don't expect a cardiologist to understand the urinary track, do you? why would you expect other non- nutrition doctors to know nutrition?
I 'm a doctor so my view might be skewed but you sound like a video game engineer should know how to build a bridge. And since they don't know how to build a bridge no engineer can build a bridge.
Also just because a doctor knows how to have a healthy diet doesn't mean he follows it. I am certain you have seen doctors smoking... do you think they don't know it is bad for their health? doctors are people too and thus are fallible to the pleasures of live, even the unhealthy ones.