The actor was offered a role in Quentin Tarantino's Oscar-winning film but declined due to differences in "creative direction."
When casting was underway for Quentin Tarantino's film Django Unchained, Will Smith emerged as a frontrunner for the starring role.
But the actor would not end up accepting the offer.
In The Hollywood Reporter's annual Actor Roundtable, Smith explained why he turned down the opportunity.
"It was about the creative direction of the story," Smith said. "To me, it's as perfect a story as you could ever want: a guy that learns how to kill to retrieve his wife that has been taken as a slave. That idea is perfect. And it was just that Quentin and I couldn't see [eye to eye]."
The decision wasn't made quickly. Smith met with the director and the two talked about the film for hours. However, Smith said he could not move past his view of the movie's overarching theme.
"I wanted to make that movie so badly, but I felt the only way was, it had to be a love story, not a vengeance story," Smith said.
The actor was cautious of the film's violence. Smith said the only way he would have agreed to make the movie was if Django Unchained centered on a love story, "not a vengeance story."
"We can't look at what happens in Paris [the terrorist attacks] and want to f— somebody up for that. Violence begets violence. I just couldn't connect to violence being the answer. Love had to be the answer," Smith explained.
With Smith's exit from the project, Jamie Foxx ultimately took the lead role.
Django Unchained went on to win two Oscars in 2013, with Tarantino winning Best Original Screenplay and Christoph Waltz taking home Best Supporting Actor.
The the Stuntmans and trainers since they actually had such a huge central role in that movie.i mean, i do remember him buying some fancy motocycles and cars, but you're right. i do recall him donating his initial matrix money to the production or something to that effect.
There's no way the Wachowskis are bad pitchers. The studio took a massive risk on greenlighting The Matrix, a script that most people didn't understand, directed by two people who'd only made one movie previously. They pitched the concept perfectly to Joel Silver and WB.
Ain't it fucked that the studio wouldn't cast Will and Laurence together in leading roles?
The Wachowskis are great at pitching. I mean, they got Cloud Atlas and Jupiter Ascending funded. That's insane.There's no way the Wachowskis are bad pitchers. The studio took a massive risk on greenlighting The Matrix, a script that most people didn't understand, directed by two people who'd only made one movie previously. They pitched the concept perfectly to Joel Silver and WB.
Keanu is not in any shape or form poor, but Will Smith is ridiculously rich. it isn't comparable.
Oh my god, that fucking pitch, lmao. I hope that was the exact pitch.
He said he turned down MiB initially because of that, not the Matrix.
Lol. Did you finish the video? He turned it down because it wasn't a great pitch by new directors not because he thought it was an alien movie.
That is honestly the first time I've ever seen that opinion expressed. Speaking strictly for at the time (haven't seen John wick or that Tai chi one) but yeah he was considered fine when you look at the fact he wasn't a martial artist but he was still pretty stiff overall.The idea of Will Smith doing kung fu is pretty funny. Guy's too gangly or something. Keanu, on the other hand, is pretty convincing as a martial artist.
He was just giving an example of when he turned down a movie and it turned out well for him in the end because he was convinced to do it anyway, compared to the time he turned down The Matrix and he made Wild Wild West instead..sorry I wasn't clear – I meant, his agents/people didn't tell him that The Matrix wasn't another "alien movie", otherwise why the pre-amble? honestly I think they didn't really help him out here.
To be honest, while I think Will Smith is a better actor than Keanu Reeves, Keanu was better for the role.
Will Smith would have likely added more of his own personality to the role and turned it into a vehicle for himself. Keanu, perhaps through his own lacking acting ability, kind of nailed the whole "detached person" angle that I felt Neo was supposed to be.
The idea of Will Smith doing kung fu is pretty funny. Guy's too gangly or something. Keanu, on the other hand, is pretty convincing as a martial artist.
The Wachowskis are great at pitching. I mean, they got Cloud Atlas and Jupiter Ascending funded. That's insane.
You're thinking of the mob. No kids, no dogs, no women.
They let him make this song, and they even paid him for it:That's actually a good reason if the pitch was like he explained.
Still no excuse for The Wild Wild West though
Actually, I do remember reading his explanation in this article, but I wonder if there was any reluctance to take on a role that saw his character degraded and dehumanised. He typically likes to play uncomplicated heroes. From the article:
I mean will still has a brand. Playing a slave turned bounty hunter killing white people isn gonna sit well with your white viewers who still see you as the fresh prince. Jamie foxx isn't Will Smith levels of mainstream notoriety. Disney isn't asking him to be the GentryI'm more interested to hear his take on turning down Django Unchained. Jamie Foxx was by no means bad, but I think the whole film would have been elevated with Will Smith in such an atypical role for him, with the innate charisma he has.
I think this is what people are missing. It's easy to say "bullet time". But when that doesn't exist, describing it is really hatdThe Matrix is a tough pitch when you don't have the movie itself as context. Hard to blame Smith or the Wachowskis here.
So the character with by far the most screen time isn't the main character? Don't get me wrong, Waltz has a lot of screen time as supporting cast, but trying to say Django wasn't the main character is plain dumb.Let's be honest, Django wasn't even the main character of his own movie despite being the titular character.
It's not like he made a horrible choice there. What has Django done for Jamie Foxx's career, exactly?
Pretty much. Django is the sidekick to christoph waltz and Waltz then kills Candie. Django as a role is kind of beneath an A list actor like Foxx or smith but that's just my opinion. You get a young up and coming actor like John boyega etc to play djanhoLet's be honest, Django wasn't even the main character of his own movie despite being the titular character.
It's not like he made a horrible choice there. What has Django done for Jamie Foxx's career, exactly?
Do people really hate WWW? I love it.That's actually a good reason if the pitch was like he explained.
Still no excuse for The Wild Wild West though
hmmmmm
I know it's historically "adequate" for the era, but kinda feels off the way they portrayed the wachowskis in the artwork.
lol this whole video reeks of bullshit. I highly doubt the only thing The Wachowskis pitched him was a stoner's impression of bullet time.
I look forward to Smith's made up recollection of Tarantino pitching him Django next.
I'd argue Keanu is in a better place career-wise than Will is.I mean, he's better off without it anyways. Sure it's a good film but do the actors have anywhere near the career or money that Will has now?