like, I don't even understand what this article is trying to say. that brooklyn bbq is more accessible?
and the ending bit
"I wonder what would happen if someone tried to imitate the inimitable Aaron Franklin in Buenos Aires, calling their brisket 'Austin-style.' Would there be outrage? Cries of heresy? Maybe it is just that the Brooklyn brand is already so exploited that no one really gives a shit anymore?"
what the hell does that even mean lol, franklin's brisket is just brisket with a half salt half pepper rub and smoked with oak. why would there be outrage if you emulated that? it's a simple ass recipe where the quality hinges more on the quality of the meat you're using and the process by which you smoke it.
I don't understand anything about this article
and I'm still caught up on that struggle ass picture of brisket and those kings rolls