Hrm... ..um... Can we talk about the term titninja for a moment? I'm sure the way its used here isn't meant in the following way-- but the way I see it applied, it almost always seems to imply "there is no value in this character beyond their sexualization" when, with the characters I see it used for, that's generally not true. And I generally, in fact, don't even see it in discussion adjacent to feminism (in spite of that one hbomberguy video which is great btw), but more in weird ass, gross "best waifu" debates and the like I come across. Like "ugh this titninja again, why couldn't it have been [the sexualized minor-appearing character] instead?" or something similarly gross.
Like, Kagero is a really interesting character, easily one of the best in FE as a whole. And while, say, Taki isn't deep, her backstory and personality are rather cool, and I- and many others I think- wouldn't balk at desexualizing her design. These aren't characters without merit. I admit I can't blame some people for assuming the worst because of the designs, and I feel like the fault is partially on the devs for undermining their characters with unnecessary sexualization. Like, there's no reason Kagero's outfit should have a lower cut top than her male counterparts when the outfit is otherwise the same, for instance.
It's just, still, discomforting. Idk. Feel free to tell me I'm just being stupid or too fragile, and I admit maybe I am. The term just makes me feel rather on edge given the sexist way I see it used- far more often than I see it used in any critique of sexualized designs.