So essentially "wow look at this thing 2 entire prosecutor teams missed that we conviniently have for a documentary that we can release after the man is dead and cannot disprove it".
please
So essentially "wow look at this thing 2 entire prosecutor teams missed that we conviniently have for a documentary that we can release after the man is dead and cannot disprove it".
so if Bill Cosby died before the women said anything, would you tell them to not make those claims still?So essentially "wow look at this thing 2 entire prosecutor teams missed that we conviniently have for a documentary that we can release after the man is dead and cannot disprove it".
please
thats not what I saidso if Bill Cosby died before the women said anything, would you tell them to not make those claims still?
Oh, u mean this housekeeper who was paid $20,000 by Hard Copy to say this and in a 1994 deposition claimed to have not saw anything, then changed her story and fell apart in cross examination by the defense in 2005? Hard to believe her here:https://www.usatoday.com/story/life...l-jackson-molestation-allegations/2593914002/
So this is an article I found about the people involved. The movies dont cover the 2003 scandal, they cover two alleged abuses that were reported after his death.
These two allegations have not been disproven by a court (the courts wont allow a civil case to go through due to Michaels death).
from an eonline story https://www.eonline.com/de/news/419...slammed-by-nephew-i-know-wade-robson-is-lying
"Robson testified during Jackson's 2005 trial on child-molestation charges that the singer did not act inappropriately toward him. A former housekeeper of Jackson's, however, said on the stand that she had seen Jackson taking a shower with Robson when the future So You Think You Can Dance regular would have been around 11 years old.
Jackson was ultimately acquitted on all charges."
You'd think this forum would be way more understanding of possible sexual assault victims. This guy is saying he was assaulted by a man who, according to the trial, would take naked showers with him when he was 11.
Doesn't the production of the art already harm the artist's victims? The art is what empowers predatory artists to exploit and abuse victims, and it shields them from consequences.I'm generally in favor of this unless the production of the art itself involved harming people.
Seems like a gutless "workaround" to me. It's still the artist's material in a huge way even if they're not the performer.
The maid's testimony is really super suspect. If you can forgive the silly URL, this page breaks it down well: https://vindicatemj.wordpress.com/2...-michael-jacksons-former-maid-blanca-francia/https://www.usatoday.com/story/life...l-jackson-molestation-allegations/2593914002/
So this is an article I found about the people involved. The movies dont cover the 2003 scandal, they cover two alleged abuses that were reported after his death.
These two allegations have not been disproven by a court (the courts wont allow a civil case to go through due to Michaels death).
from an eonline story https://www.eonline.com/de/news/419...slammed-by-nephew-i-know-wade-robson-is-lying
"Robson testified during Jackson's 2005 trial on child-molestation charges that the singer did not act inappropriately toward him. A former housekeeper of Jackson's, however, said on the stand that she had seen Jackson taking a shower with Robson when the future So You Think You Can Dance regular would have been around 11 years old.
Jackson was ultimately acquitted on all charges."
You'd think this forum would be way more understanding of possible sexual assault victims. This guy is saying he was assaulted by a man who, according to the trial, would take naked showers with him when he was 11.
Read a lottttt more about it at the link. Like, literally every line of testimony.Let's summarize her testimony here:
Finally, here is a photo of Blanca with Victor Gutierrez, who used her and other Neverland employees as a source for his science fiction book "Michael Jackson Was My Lover", which we thoroughly debunked beginning with this post.
- Blanca Francia was hired in 1985 to be MJ's personal housekeeper, and continued to work for him at Neverland. She was fired in 1991 for theft and tardiness, among other disciplinary problems. (This was confirmed by other Neverland employees.) She was an illegal alien with a fraudulent social security number, who also had her wages garnished by creditors to pay her debts, and who once looked inside the purse of a co-worker to see how much they had been paid!
- In December 1993, Blanca's friend and former Neverland co-worker Evangeline helped secure her interview with Diane Dimond of Hard Copy, and Blanca gave Evangeline some of the $20,000 dollars that she was paid. Blanca was also required by contract to give Dimond a photo of MJ and her son Jason.
- Blanca was misled by Dimond into thinking that she would be talking exclusively about her employment at Neverland, but instead she was asked questions about Michael Jackson, and the things that she allegedly "saw" while working there. For example, she said that she was concerned about the safety of her son after seeing MJ reading to him and playing tickling games with him, and that she saw MJ showering with a young boy, which made her quit her job in disgust.
- However, during her deposition in January 1994 with Larry Feldman, Blanca admitted that Dimond and Hard Copy "were not very honest" because they sold her photos to other tabloids, she was also contacted by the National Enquirer and the LA Times for an interview, that she was "tired and nervous" during the deposition, and didn't see Wade Robeson in the shower with MJ, and really couldn't tell who was in the shower! She also admitted to both Hard Copy and Larry Feldman that she never saw MJ abuse any child.
- In December 1994, Blanca and her lawyers threatened to sue MJ for sexual abuse, and that lawsuit was settled out of court before it could be filed and made public. You can read more about it here.
- There was a major discrepancy between Blanca and her son Jason's testimonies regarding his first account of "abuse": Blanca said that she witnessed Jason sitting on MJ's leg as he read Jason a book and she grabbed him and left, and Jason initially admitted this in his police interrogation, but in 2005 he testified that he and MJ rolled on the floor before the tickling games began! Jason also testified that there was a TV in the room, but Blanca did not mention one in her testimony. (You can read this post to see a full analysis of Jason Francia's testimony.) Also, during her testimony Blanca said she couldn't remember if her friend Evangeline tried to set up the interview with the National Enquirer in 1994, until Mesereau showed her the deposition transcript, and the jury laughed at her (after she said "Oh", in recognition of what she said in 1994)!
- Blanca also admitted that MJ had children and adults in his bedroom at all hours of the day and night, and when children slept in his bed, there were many of them, not just one! She also testified that MJ called lots of children "Applehead" and "Rubba", and had tickling games with them, including his own cousins, nieces, and nephews!
No, we're not. At least, I'm not.Now we're finding the allegations credible again....? This has been a long back and forth and I don't know what to think...
Imagine an alternate reality where Era boycotts Bloodbourne XDHe's dead. Even if it is true, boycotting him is like boycotting HP Lovecraft.
I still listen to a couple songs despite him having been a garbage human.
Funny cause HBO paid $20 million to air MJ's Dangerous Tour concert in 1992, now they paid god knows how much to air this shady documentary. Odd decision from them.HBO usually does top flight docs so I have no idea - outside of money - why they are debasing their own brand with this shit.
Wow. Shame on you.I still listen to a couple songs despite him having been a garbage human.
Funny cause HBO paid $20 million to air MJ's Dangerous Tour concert in 1992, now they paid god knows how much to air this shady documentary. Odd decision from them.
Funny cause HBO paid $20 million to air MJ's Dangerous Tour concert in 1992, now they paid god knows how much to air this shady documentary. Odd decision from them.
Most of the people who were making decisions for HBO 27 years ago are gone now
Micheal spent the last decade of his life being the butt of every pedophile joke people could think of. R. Kelly had multiple pieces of hard evidence of him being a pedo (including video) and his whole damn industry either turned a blind eye or outright defended him.
If this doc has solid evidence of him being a predator, then sure, a conversation about his influence should happen, but to frame this discussion with a comparision to Kelly is disengenious.
Not guilty is not the same as innocent. I am not going to say he was a pedo, but I think I can live without his music just in case.
Imagine an alternate reality where Era boycotts Bloodbourne XD
HBO usually does top flight docs so I have no idea - outside of money - why they are debasing their own brand with this shit.
Not guilty is not the same as innocent. I am not going to say he was a pedo, but I think I can live without his music just in case.
Even if the evidence is quite damning people will be hypocrites because it's Michael Jackson.