GameSpot - 8/10
PCGamesN - 8/10
Sector.sk - 8/10
Worth Playing - 8/10
The Games Machine - 8/10
Spaziogames - 8/10
IGN Spain - 8.6/10
Game Informer - 8.5/10
GaminGuardian - 8.5/10
Everyeye.it - 8.4/10
Metro - 7/10
GameSpace - 7/10
Game MAG - 7/10
Digital Trends - 7/10
GamePro - 7.7/10
Cerealkillerz - 7.5/10
Destructoid - 6/10
IGN - 6.5/10
PowerUp! - 6.3/10
Trusted Reviews - 4/5
Guardian - 4/5
Attack of the Fanboy - 3/5
Hobby Consolas - 80/100
PC Gamer - 79/100
COGconnected - 69/100
ACG - Wait for a sale
USgamer - Unscored (We haven't played Wolfenstein: Youngblood's online co-op yet, but here are our early impressions.)
Ars Technica - Unscored (Buy it if you have an ideal co-op partner, want a simpler co-op alternative to MMO-like shooters, or just really, really like newer Wolfenstein games. Otherwise, proceed with caution.)
VG247 - Unscored (Most of its good points are inherited from the last game, and while the excellent level design improvements are welcome, there's not enough variety to get the most out of them.)
Polygon - Unscored (Youngblood is a meat-and-potatoes first-person shooter where all the systems work well, the enemies provide a brutal challenge, and a friend can come along with you through the whole thing. It seems like it was designed as a relatively inexpensive crowd-pleaser of an FPS, and I will admit that I was very entertained.)
I was looking for a review thread for a general round up of reviews and realized there wasn't one so I whipped this one up quickly. I thought people loved Wolf? Anyway, it looks like this one is dividing players and critics. If I've missed a decent review let me know and I'll add it in. For what it's worth, I'm really enjoying playing the PC version solo.
Last edited: