This, that doesn't make any sense whatsoever, who the fuck thought it was a good idea ?
This is what I've come to accept.does anyone at wb, like, talk to each other ever or do they all just make new directions up every day
Comics definitely do that, they're a damn mess lol. Another thing I love about the MCU, it distills everything down to a single continuity. You don't need to look up a reading order to understand what the hell is going on. Just watch the movies in the order they came out. Simple.Honestly if the movies are good I doubt people would care. And don't comic books do that all the time? Different authors having different interpretations and such? And what Marvel did with their movies has paid off, Feige is a genius. But the idea that one offcomic book movie is a waste of time because there won't be a sequel or whatever is insane to me. A good movie is a good movie
I would've enjoyed BvS more if it took place in TDK timeline though. I also would've enjoyed seeing Harvry Dent have some sort of cameo in MoS. TDK was also pre-Avengers.
Again, obviously, superhero movies can be fine as solo films. They're just more interesting when they're part of a larger universe.
I feel like you're trolling me right now. The MCU is as popular as it is because it's an interconnected universe. Period. That's, like, half the point of it.
It'd be fine if they weren't making multiple Joker movies with different actors and rebooting stuff like Suicide Squad so soon after the original. That's just putting comic book level timeline complexity into movies. I'm a nerd and even I can't be bothered with that shit.
What they should've done before is wipe everything and start fresh with an actual vision. Or just salvage the DCEU. It wasn't irreparable, early MCU had some stinkers too. This new approach is just bogus.
Why are some of you so bothered by them saying it isn't a sequel, who cares?
Because people are already using this as an excuse to shit on it before it comes out.
I don't get how it's not a sequel. So the things that happen in the first film didn't happen for this film then? They're ignoring it all?
That doesn't seem to be the case. They mention "intervening years" so this is a sequel, just one that doesn't involve a continuation of the previous story.So that's why Steve is alive, because the first film never happened and not magic or something?
Good
Make all all DC films standalone and have nothing to do with one another.
Just focus on making fun movies
But why since it was they most popular movie out of all the other DC oneBasically. It's like a way for them to play it safe with Wonder Woman. I hope it stops with this movie and they continue on the usual normal tragectory of these films.
this is totally something that should be retconned, yeah. It was stupid.I'm going to assume, as well, that they'll change what happened with the gods. The idea that Ares was the only god alive kinda sucks, so maybe they'll change it so she still fought Ares in WW1 but he never wiped out all the others thousands of years prior to the movie.
This sounds really dumb. Like maybe the first Wonder Woman was a fluke. I'm willing to give them the benefit of the doubt, but good lord, this and that Steve Trevor is coming back is just so bizarre.
This sounds really dumb. Like maybe the first Wonder Woman was a fluke. I'm willing to give them the benefit of the doubt, but good lord, this and that Steve Trevor is coming back is just so bizarre.
"I have pretty clear plans for 'Wonder Woman 3,'" Jenkins said. "Whether I [direct] it or not, I see how her arc should end in my incarnation of Wonder Woman. I have great passion for that."