It's not the same thing. Quality journalists who demonstrate a track record of getting things right despite quoting anonymous sources are trustworthy.
You say you watch sports, do you trust Adam Schefter? He never names his sources, but he's almost always the first person to report insider NFL info and is never wrong.
I don't watch ESPN's coverage of the NFL much anymore the past couple years, I've switched to mainly NFL Network since that time
But from what I recall, Schefter has done plenty of non-anonymous normal stories. And public interviews with people. Or just talked about his own personal opinions about stuff with fellow colleagues. As far as literally
never being wrong?? I don't care enough about the subject to go spend my time documenting his entire career, but I have a hard time believing that. I thought he was fine, but I still wouldn't blindly believe 100%
However you do have a general point -- I know nothing about the website/author of that Blizzard article. I don't visit any gaming websites whatsoever besides ERA (or GAF before). I've never had Twitter and never read twitter. Never read facebook. I look on reddit maybe once every 2 or 3 months, but only for specific reasons, not just randomly browsing
The last time I've visited gaming websites was like IGN/Gamespot during 2000 to early-2000s. But not since GAF started around 2005/2006?
Your earlier suspicion was also correct -- I don't read or watch news of any kind outside of video games either. I browse two internet forums and that's it, ERA and a subscription-only college football forum of the university I attended