Loot question that came up yesterday.
We down Ilgy, and a corrupted version of the shield drops for me. Mostly lovely, but I'm still playing catch-up on my cloak for a bit, and the shield currently sends me into uncomfortable-corruption territory for a tank (i.e. the Thing From Beyond area, which is pretty much a no-no).
My cotank - who's been raiding a little longer and so is a bit ahead of me - also had the shield drop, albeit without corruption, he didn't particularly need it, so he put it up for rolls as we do, and I put myself down for a minor upgrade roll; unwilling to take priority over straight 'needs', but it would be of a benefit, and I made it perfectly clear to the group that I was rolling explicitly as a short-term upgrade until I get my cloak up a couple of ranks to be back in safe corruption territory.
The actual end result for us was academic - no-one else was interested, so I got it anyway - but it did get me thinking about how to field that question if it comes up around a more contentious item; is it okay to say "this item is explicitly going to fill a gap until I am able to make use of this other item I have"? I certainly wouldn't ever give it priority over any explicit full needs, but it's also not really something that fits with our guild concept of a "minor upgrade".
(It strikes me that this is not too dissimilar to the "caster using a staff, but wanting to take an offhand item that they can't properly use until they get a 1h to go with it" question that occasionally crops up)
We down Ilgy, and a corrupted version of the shield drops for me. Mostly lovely, but I'm still playing catch-up on my cloak for a bit, and the shield currently sends me into uncomfortable-corruption territory for a tank (i.e. the Thing From Beyond area, which is pretty much a no-no).
My cotank - who's been raiding a little longer and so is a bit ahead of me - also had the shield drop, albeit without corruption, he didn't particularly need it, so he put it up for rolls as we do, and I put myself down for a minor upgrade roll; unwilling to take priority over straight 'needs', but it would be of a benefit, and I made it perfectly clear to the group that I was rolling explicitly as a short-term upgrade until I get my cloak up a couple of ranks to be back in safe corruption territory.
The actual end result for us was academic - no-one else was interested, so I got it anyway - but it did get me thinking about how to field that question if it comes up around a more contentious item; is it okay to say "this item is explicitly going to fill a gap until I am able to make use of this other item I have"? I certainly wouldn't ever give it priority over any explicit full needs, but it's also not really something that fits with our guild concept of a "minor upgrade".
(It strikes me that this is not too dissimilar to the "caster using a staff, but wanting to take an offhand item that they can't properly use until they get a 1h to go with it" question that occasionally crops up)