It either that or Nintendo starts cutting Pokémon from games. It's not possible to keep adding new ones for eternity.
Yes it literally is.
It either that or Nintendo starts cutting Pokémon from games. It's not possible to keep adding new ones for eternity.
And y'all can stop acting like the jealous middle child Everytime gen 1 gets attention.
It either that or Nintendo starts cutting Pokémon from games. It's not possible to keep adding new ones for eternity.
the cannon storyline would be that they were endangered species and then just went extinct... then they could come back in later games through fossils!
nintendo has absolutely nothing to say about adding or removing pokemon.
I'm fine with how 6 and 7 did it. Push the new mons, but have the old favorites on standby.No. And they should always do like B/W, only new Pokemon available till the end game
That settles it, all of these are joke threads at my expense.That doesn't eliminate their models from the game though which is the problem. They would have be removed completely.
That doesn't eliminate their models from the game though which is the problem. They would have be removed completely.
they had 800+ models on the 3ds, what makes you think the switch can't handle way more than that.
Nope, BW2 is where the best balnce lies while gen six and seven gens have huge bias towards gen one pokemon, having more pokemon in the region than new ones.I'm fine with how 6 and 7 did it. Push the new mons, but have the old favorites on standby.
They pushed gen 5 only and wound up with the worst designs of the series and only had those to standby.
What, exactly, is extensive about using models that already exist for the express purpose of not needing to make new ones for a long time?Storage will never be the problem. It's the amount of work involved . And games are more complicated graphically. Even at Nintendo's glacial pace of advancement that will become an issue too.
Storage will never be the problem. It's the amount of work involved . And games are more complicated graphically. Even at Nintendo's glacial pace of advancement that will become an issue too.
Nope, BW2 is where the best balnce lies while gen six and seven gens have huge bias towards gen one pokemon, having more pokemon in the region than new ones.
It really isn't that different.Nope, BW2 is where the best balnce lies while gen six and seven gens have huge bias towards gen one pokemon, having more pokemon in the region than new ones.
I'm fine with how 6 and 7 did it. Push the new mons, but have the old favorites on standby.
Nature does let some animals go extinct though.
It's really stupid. It's like if they encounter any Pokemon they didn't grow up with they're gonna dead ass cry.No. What's with some people's obsession with cutting off or cutting out Pokémon? Who does it hurt to keep adding more?
I had a whole team of new mons in both games. Meanwhile, I saw a lot of old favorites.Did I play a different Gen 6 and 7 because I'm pretty sure the opposite of this happened.
I don't think many here would complain about a Pokemon Snap quest line (not that weak shit that was in SM).To do with your Pokemon, sure. I'm all for Pokemon contests and the like.
Why the fuck would they stop?
Literally sounds like an old person mad "their" series has continued on without them.
Humans were the 1000th Pokemon all along.
Regional forms and re-typing would be enough for meGod no. No they don't and no they shouldn't. The number 1 main appeal of Pokemon is the new Pokemon.
It's really stupid. It's like if they encounter any Pokemon they didn't grow up with they're gonna dead ass cry.
the pokemon have never been the part that takes the most amount of time. and it's also the part that's most easily outsourcable. this is a ridiculous pointThey will if the game takes too long to make or becomes prohibitively expensive.
limitations that won't existsThis is about technical limitations not nostalgia, I have favorites from all gens.
Maybe they want to (not so)secretly kill off this franchise.Never
Why do y'all want to stop the Pokémon train man
"Remove some Pokémon"
"Stop at 1000"
This train ain't stopping you chumps
Choo choo
Please, tell me how? Because BW2 has 151 gen five pokemon while every other gen is around 30-40 pokemon. A varied amount of pokemon, but gen five still has the spotlight on them. A huge difference when compared to gen six where while more varied the new pokemon are harder to find, and also have less when conpared to another gen. Next your gonna tell me Johto didn't also had a Kanto bias, and all the johto pokemon were easily findable...
Technical limitations that you're literally making up.This about technical limitations not nostalgia, I have favorites from all gens.
Technical limitations that you're literally making up.
The fucking 3DS could handle 800+. Do you really think that the Switch can't handle 1001?
But we have new species going extinct every year. Didn't some kind of snail just went extinct yesterday?Exctinct pokemon are already in the game. You revive them from fossils.