If you had a chance to be able to be fluent in every language, would you prefer that you would be able to speak and listen fluently, or to be able to read and write fluently?
What are your reasons?
What are your reasons?
Well, that's the thing, isn't it-- what if there's nobody there to teach you the written language in question? In that case, the written thing gives you something that literally nobody else could.Spoken. There are very few times where you won't be able to learn a written language at your own pace but it's incredibly embarrassing when you're trying to speak another language and you keep having to pause to remember the word
That's what I based my answer on. I think programming language would also count.I haven't decided just yet, but let me be clear here-- written would include... DEAD LANGUAGES, right? Like, I could just read a Paleo-Hebrew manuscript and get the original intent? I could read the Voynich manuscript just like that? I'd just know Linear A?
Because Option 1 seems like a great way to tour the world. Option 2 seems like a great way to just... find the secret wisdom and history of the world.
Holy shit, if programming is involved... that'd be fucking something, wouldn't it. I mean, I thought I was thinking big with the "dead languages" stuff, but with programming... Now THAT is a galaxy brain take.Programming and machine languages count right? If so written no contest.
I would be able to make the craziest programs / games / apps for every possible hardware.
Seems like knowing C/C++, Java/Kotlin, and Objective-C/Swift would cover the vast majority of HWProgramming and machine languages count right? If so written no contest.
I would be able to make the craziest programs / games / apps for every possible hardware.
Well, that's the thing, isn't it-- what if there's nobody there to teach you the written language in question? In that case, the written thing gives you something that literally nobody else could.
The spoken has an equivalent in near-dead primarily spoken indigenous languages, which would be a major boon for anthropologists. But holy hell, imagine if the written one extends back into the past. A) You'd be in high demand, thanks to a peerless ability to translate manuscripts, and B) you'd know things nobody else could know. You'd know Linear A, you'd know Paleo-Hebrew, you'd know what the Voynich manuscript says, all dead away. "Written language" might also encompass cyphers-- substitution cyphers particularly, since they retain the linguistic structures but change the characters around.
Programming and machine languages count right? If so written no contest.
I would be able to make the craziest programs / games / apps for every possible hardware.
Milo wouldn't have made it very far in Atlantis if he didn't speak Atlantean but he was able to work out the written part of it on his own
This is more of an everyday practicality vs cool shit thing. I don't have a ton of use for knowing a written dead language but I could go Indiana Jones adventuring with it which might be pretty cool. On the other hand, in the business/political world, being able to speak all the languages would be great for a job.Phonetic pronunciation keys like the International Pronunciation Alphabet are also written language though! You have a tremendous leg up on learning currently spoken languages!
I'm actually thinking of direct practicality as well. You could easily become a translator or localizer, which is something you can start from home. If you had nothing in life but literacy and this superpower, you'd already have a tremendous leg up in translation, history, and programming.This is more of an everyday practicality vs cool shit thing. I don't have a ton of use for knowing a written dead language but I could go Indiana Jones adventuring with it which might be pretty cool. On the other hand, in the business/political world, being able to speak all the languages would be great for a job.
Latin is the classic example. You can kinda sound out the words, but you realize that if a Roman actually heard your pronunciation it'd basically be like that one scene in Inglorious Basterds where Brad Pitt says he can speak Italian. You could recognize vowels but the intonations would be lost on you.I can understand being a fluent speaker but not a fluent reader but how can the reverse work? Never had any personal experience like that.
Factoring in programming is definitely a leg up, yeah. When I read the prompt I assumed we were going on currently used human languagesI'm actually thinking of direct practicality as well. You could easily become a translator or localizer, which is something you can start from home. If you had nothing in life but literacy and this superpower, you'd already have a tremendous leg up in translation, history, and programming.
That's the secret, isn't it-- programming languages are currently used human languages, by any standard!Factoring in programming is definitely a leg up, yeah. When I read the prompt I assumed we were going on currently used human languages
Factoring in programming is definitely a leg up, yeah. When I read the prompt I assumed we were going on currently used human languages
Eh, more human to machine and machine to machine. Programming languages as we know them are made so that humans can read them more easily. If you whittle it down to what the machine actually sees it's actually a lot differentThat's the secret, isn't it-- programming languages are currently used human languages, by any standard!
The question makes little sense to me, if you can read/write a language then you would be able to speak it fluently. Unless you have some physical defect in this scenario?