Indie studios gonna have a long time of reaping the benefits then.
Golf Story
Indie studios gonna have a long time of reaping the benefits then.
Sad truth, im still trying to get money for a Switch but im happy for its deserved sucess, Nintendo is tapping a new market, it just needs to get away from some old practices. Im surviving with my WiiU.
I'm going to need a side scrolling Castlevania, ASAP. Something along the lines of the DS games. Those were my jam.Didn't they talk about reviving old IPs or something along those lines? Maybe gradius, castlevania or goemon, Who knows?
Goemon, Castlevania, Suikoden, Gradius, Contra... So many games they could bring back.Didn't they talk about reviving old IPs or something along those lines? Maybe gradius, castlevania or goemon, Who knows?
Im finishing BoTw, then its Bayo 1, then its Xenoblade Chronicles 1, i think X may come after i go through the Prime trilogy. Strangely i got my WiiU this year for BotW, instead of a Switch, i was like: look at this HUGE backlog of gems, no need to use all this cash for a Switch yet. I mean WiiU has The Wonderful 101, im good for now.Hey. Mine is on Layaway. I've been playing the crap out of Xenoblade Chronicles X.
Sounds like you need some stitches. Ever been confronted by a dead man?
It probably doesn't belong in this world.I'm curious to see what Konami's next big move with Switch is.
Super Bomberman R sold very well for Switch.
I'm going to need a side scrolling Castlevania, ASAP. Something along the lines of the DS games. Those were my jam.
I'm curious to see what Konami's next big move with Switch is.
Super Bomberman R sold very well for Switch.
They all bitches. And bitches get stitches. Takahashi wants to have a word.
I can get behind that.Sounds like you need some stitches. Ever been confronted by a dead man?
I'm curious to see what Konami's next big move with Switch is.
Super Bomberman R sold very well for Switch.
You really think Konami is gonna make more Switch games?
I thought they were done with games, and that they only made SBR because Nintendo asked them to.
Yeah. Just as the quote reads, Koei Tecmo was all on-board with the Switch from the start, between Fire Emblem Warriors, Nights of Azure 2 and other games that they already have planned, whether their ports or new titles.They probably do, it's some third parties that were caught with their pants down.
Don't do this to me.
It's Castlevania. Either a remake of 3 or something original with the tv show characters. Probably contracted out to someone, like Good Feel or Inti-Creates.I'm curious to see what Konami's next big move with Switch is.
Super Bomberman R sold very well for Switch.
Didn't they talk about reviving old IPs or something along those lines? Maybe gradius, castlevania or goemon, Who knows?
Konami is making a new Metal Gear game! At least, it's technically Metal Gear.
I really loved what Inti Creates did with Blaster Master, so I would be thrilled if they were given the reigns for a new Castlevania.It's Castlevania. Either a remake of 3 or something original with the tv show characters. Probably contracted out to someone, like Good Feel or Inti-Creates.
Nintendo could potentially carry Switch by themselves in 2018 if they invest heavily in accelerating development on some games. Potential releases, might be forgetting some (some confirmed in development, some assumptions):
Smash Bros 5
Metroid Prime 4
Pikmin 4
Animal Crossing
Retro's game
Mario Maker
Pokemon
Kirby
Yoshi
If 5 or 6 of those games came out and they keep up the indie barrage I think that would be enough to carry the system while 3rd parties catch up.
Even for the confirmed announced games, are those all supposed to be 2018? Metroid Prime 4 in particular had literally zero footage. For Pokemon too, there hasn't even been a trailer, and they said 2018 was the earliest that game could be out. Aside from Kirby and Yoshi, the rest are either formless, TBA, or completely unannounced.
Even for the confirmed announced games, are those all supposed to be 2018? Metroid Prime 4 in particular had literally zero footage. For Pokemon too, there hasn't even been a trailer, and they said 2018 was the earliest that game could be out. Aside from Kirby and Yoshi, the rest are either formless, TBA, or completely unannounced.
While I think Prime is unlikely, it's not like Nintendo didn't just release a major game that only a year ago was a few seconds of a console preview video with no title. Nintendo can hold their cards close to their chest when they want.Even for the confirmed announced games, are those all supposed to be 2018? Metroid Prime 4 in particular had literally zero footage. For Pokemon too, there hasn't even been a trailer, and they said 2018 was the earliest that game could be out. Aside from Kirby and Yoshi, the rest are either formless, TBA, or completely unannounced.
Do we really expected Nintendo not to make direct 3DS successful and just stick with Switch?But the 3DS was a success, as all Nintendo handhelds have been. The Switch is physically still a handheld device despite it's function.
Yep.
Ummm, yes?Do we really expected Nintendo not to make direct 3DS successful and just stick with Switch?
Plus 3ds games were cheap to make. Switch might be underpowered, but making games for it is still far more expensive, do there's bigger risk
Do we really expected Nintendo not to make direct 3DS successful and just stick with Switch?
Plus 3ds games were cheap to make. Switch might be underpowered, but making games for it is still far more expensive, do there's bigger risk
Yes, most people don't expect a 3DS successor.Do we really expected Nintendo not to make direct 3DS successful and just stick with Switch?
Plus 3ds games were cheap to make. Switch might be underpowered, but making games for it is still far more expensive, do there's bigger risk
It's also all they had, they needed to do something and they have ignored third parties. It's good the switch is a success but I'm still interested in the releases for next year and if it will any software droughts because of third parties being wary. I'm not expecting Pokémon or Metroid until late next year or 2019.Its not surprising. Wii fizzled out, Wii U was a disaster and the hybrid rumors seemed to scare people, if anything.
Its probably why Nintendo doubled down on first party anyways, not just to create a worthwhile library right away but to give third parties a chance to catch up and get their shot at selling software when Nintendo is done with their first party onslaught
Switch is way to big to become real replacement for 3DS though, so I guess Nintendo just gave up on handheld market and resigned to mobile completely taking over that space? Which kind of makes sense seeing their increased investenmt into mobile and the success they had in that market.
I know many who like to say that the device would be more successful if it were really 'portable' i.e. able to fit in a pocket, however sales of past handhelds, phones included have leaned strongly towards bigger is better. In Japan the 'problem' of not fitting into a pocket is effectively nil, as everyone starting from age 4 carries bags big enough to bring the switch.Switch is way to big to become real replacement for 3DS though, so I guess Nintendo just gave up on handheld market and resigned to mobile completely taking over that space? Which kind of makes sense seeing their increased investenmt into mobile and the success they had in that market.
It still seems like a wasted opportunity though. It's not like they simply have to create separate system. Just wait for tech to get cheaper and smaller and just create 3DS-sized Switch-mini in few years, compatibile with all the same games, just smaller.
Well, mobile companies do make devices of various size. from smaller phones to tablets. No reason why Nintendo should stick to one Switch size.I know many who like to say that the device would be more successful if it were really 'portable' i.e. able to fit in a pocket, however sales of past handhelds, phones included have leaned strongly towards bigger is better. In Japan the 'problem' of not fitting into a pocket is effectively nil, as everyone starting from age 4 carries bags big enough to bring the switch.
The problem is that battery tech is terribly stagnant and the Switch's battery takes up like half it's innards and three quarters of it's height. There's not much room or opportunity to actually shrink the thing down, the alternative would be shortening battery life and that just isn't reasonable with how few hours it already gets.Well, mobile companies do make devices of various size. from smaller phones to tablets. No reason why Nintendo should stick to one Switch size.
The problem is that battery tech is terribly stagnant and the Switch's battery takes up like half it's innards and three quarters of it's height. There's not much room or opportunity to actually shrink the thing down, the alternative would be shortening battery life and that just isn't reasonable with how few hours it already gets.