Content removed.
-
Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
-
We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.
At this rate base minimum requirement would be a 256gb card.
Not being entirely serious, but jesus christ this is getting out of hand, should be expected with third parties though.
Not being entirely serious, but jesus christ this is getting out of hand, should be expected with third parties though.
Not surprised, the PS4 version clocks in at 53.25 GB. It also has the worst load times I've experience in roughly 20 years or more (on PS4), so I sold mine, lol.
If MicroSDs are hot swappable games should come with a 32GB Microsd if they're pulling that bullshit. That's awful.
Welcome to next gen gaming lol.
Does anyone here own other consoles or a PC? You had to have seen this coming.
Does anyone here own other consoles or a PC? You had to have seen this coming.
It was going to become a thing from the jump. There was an opportunity to offload the cost to consumers and if it fails to sell, just point the finger at Nintendo and say, see these games don't sell on your console. Although to be fair, Nintendo should have seen this coming and offered at least 128gb of built in memory.
Content removed.
OP
OP
Deleted member 62
Guest
I don't think publishers take Nintendo serious enough to care what people think. I think Nintendo should just be thankful publishers even bringing games over.
We all know only first party Nintendo games sells really well on the system. EX. Mario, Splatoon and Zelda.
You're right, Nintendo should be subsidizing it. Everyone should put pressure on Nintendo to do so. Until they subsidize the prices for Pubs, or just get cheaper carts available this will continue to happen.
Why even bother releasing a physical copy? Just assume that anyone who buys digital games already expanded its console memory.
Content removed.
OP
OP
Deleted member 62
Guest
Hard to say unless we know the price of the 8GB versus the higher GB carts.
This is supposed to be a horrible game and I don't really want to reward this model. I would honestly rather pay $2 more for the game to pay for the cart price.
Literally just read this now. It's such a shame, it just doesn't translate well with the "easy" kind of brand or image the Switch has.
Not to mention the implications for game preservation and the like.
So for a game that's already out - like NBA - it literally will not even boot unless updated?
128gb on board memory would of seen the switch bomb. Would have been to expensive to sell to the consumer.
LOL. This is getting more and more ridiculous. Good thing I'm not planning to ever get a multiplatform game on Switch :)
Probably true but they passed the cost on to consumers and now some of us will have to purchase at least 128gb card.
Publishers absolutely have talks with manufacturers about prices of things and how their support factors in.
Thanks.
Content removed.
OP
OP
Deleted member 62
Guest
So you can sale, lend the game to friends? IDK. For the X86 twins, all games must be installed in the HDD even if you bought them physical. And now you see games that wont start at all without the day 1 patch, let alone the many others that released on a broken stage and need the day 1 patch to run decently.
