Yup. It's why I picked him even though my personal favourite is Spielberg.
Spielberg's best work is supremely enjoyable even on rewatches. He may not always make gritty dramas and he's got more than a few stinkers but I'll take his best work over nearly anyone else's.
Especially if we're just going by directing. Like Lucas has only directed 6 films and only 3 of those are good.He also has the biggest movie collection and is still doing quality work 45 years later. The others just don't have the output.
Does any of this happen without Spielberg and Jaws though?Drop Lucas and the ripple effect is huge. Putting aside Star Wars, you lose:
...and so many other things like the absence of Skywalker Sound, which is still a massive studio for sound design, mixing, and editing. Heck losing a few movies, he probably has had the biggest impact of a multitude of entertainment industries -- not just film. Of that list, he's maybe second only to Spielberg, for a variety of similar reasons.
- Industrial Light & Magic, and various pioneering in CG for digital effects, characters, environments, and compositing
- Pixar, which would fail to (at least as immediately) lead to Dreamworks and many other shops developing computer-animated films [edit: and this probably has other effects through to NeXT computing and Apple in some way due to giving Jobs a lot more walking-around money in the late 90s, but I'm not familiar enough with the history there to go so far as to say "No Pixar means no iPhone"]
- No LucasArts -- so no Monkey Island or other titles from folks that would form Double Fine and other shops (and, obviously, every Star Wars game ever)
Apocalypse Now?
Apocalypse Now?
Anyway I went with Scorsese, Spielberg is a close second though
And? Spielberg has such an incredible and fun catalog. I don't want to watch the grittiest nam movie forever.
Well you said only two, but there be three incredible films form him