As far as English as a second language goes, the Dutch are about as close to native-English as it gets, and not at all representative of the typical level of English understood by the average non-native speaker.
Hence the 'not always'
As far as English as a second language goes, the Dutch are about as close to native-English as it gets, and not at all representative of the typical level of English understood by the average non-native speaker.
Just because you don't see or understand it, doesn't mean it isn't there.
It's just a pleonasm my dude. Not that deep.Yes it is. Otherwise they'd just say "beg-packers" and their point would still stand.
These shitty go to images and one off replies hoping to shut down discussion and paint people as "privileged snowflakes" in one go can fuck off.
I thought immigration (?) would ask people about their return. I've seen people refused entry into Canada because of it. I feel like I'd flip if I ever saw one of these people while on vacation tho.
Aren't embassies suppose to help in these sort of situations?
lol
lol for real. Shut that shit right down, right quick. Fuck 'em.I don't really get why people give these morons anything to begin with.
lol for real. Shut that shit right down, right quick. Fuck 'em.
Well he was right. The idea that only white people are doing this is beyond stupid and pointing it out has nothing to do with insecurity. You just had an pointless image and have now wasted 3 minutes of my life with your insane mentality. What a waste of time and I realized that this will only derail the topic.
The same white fragility/defensiveness was on display, is the point. The video explains itself.Not all white people are beg-packers? I damn hope so.
I think what they were asking is "are all beg-packers white people?" or "is this only a problem when white people do it?". Again, the answer to both questions could very well be yes, but why shut down the discussion? I feel like the point of them being white is important to the lady who made the video, so we should probably discuss it.
It's not in any way lol.Yes it is. Otherwise they'd just say "beg-packers" and their point would still stand.
i'm petrified to leave the country without thousands of dollars to blow through. could never wrap my head around this thing
But it's not though because it changes the meaning. "Travelling beg-packers" would be a pleonasm; this is not.
Is it just a pleonasm though? Wouldn't that then imply that "yes, all bag-packers are white"? Most of 'em probably are, sure... but shouldn't you be addressing all of them rather than arbitrarily singling out a race, even if it probably covers most of them?
The vast majority of them are white.But it's not though because it changes the meaning. "Travelling beg-packers" would be a pleonasm; this is not.
See above.Is it just a pleonasm though? Wouldn't that then imply that "yes, all bag-packers are white"? Most of 'em probably are, sure... but shouldn't you be addressing all of them rather than arbitrarily singling out a race, even if it probably covers most of them?
I'm guessing they're singling out white folk to make a point about white privilege, but the problem here isn't white privilege. The problem is beg-packing, white privilege merely shapes the demographic that engages in said practice. Or in other words, if white privilege weren't a thing and anybody could "safely" beg-pack, beg-packing would still be just as lame.
Exactly.Is it just a pleonasm though? Wouldn't that then imply that "yes, all bag-packers are white"? Most of 'em probably are, sure... but shouldn't you be addressing all of them rather than arbitrarily singling out a race, even if it probably covers most of them?
I'm guessing they're singling out white folk to make a point about white privilege, but the problem here isn't white privilege. The problem is beg-packing, white privilege merely shapes the demographic that engages in said practice. Or in other words, if white privilege weren't a thing and anybody could "safely" beg-pack, beg-packing would still be just as lame.
Yes it is, no it is a big part, and what's the point of your headcanon where white privilege doesn't exist lolI'm guessing they're singling out white folk to make a point about white privilege, but the problem here isn't white privilege. The problem is beg-packing, white privilege merely shapes the demographic that engages in said practice. Or in other words, if white privilege weren't a thing and anybody could "safely" beg-pack, beg-packing would still be just as lame.
Yeah, I'll happily discuss the evils of colorblind multi-race beg-packing once we fix the little privilege issue, that is a huge part of the current situation.Yes it is, no it is a big part, and what's the point of your headcanon where white privilege doesn't exist lol
Yall fragile as fuck
Because she says why in the video.Why single out white ones? I'm pretty sure there are beg packers who aren't white as well.
I never said white privilege doesn't exist. In fact I obviously think it does exist, if you actually even tried to comprehend my post.Yes it is, no it is a big part, and what's the point of your headcanon where white privilege doesn't exist lol
Yall fragile as fuck
No, the problem is what the video shows: the white privilege combined with the begpacking.Is it just a pleonasm though? Wouldn't that then imply that "yes, all bag-packers are white"? Most of 'em probably are, sure... but shouldn't you be addressing all of them rather than arbitrarily singling out a race, even if it probably covers most of them?
I'm guessing they're singling out white folk to make a point about white privilege, but the problem here isn't white privilege. The problem is beg-packing, white privilege merely shapes the demographic that engages in said practice. Or in other words, if white privilege weren't a thing and anybody could "safely" beg-pack, beg-packing would still be just as lame.
The last sentence of your post I quoted was a big lot of nothingI never said white privilege doesn't exist. In fact I obviously think it does exist, if you actually even tried to comprehend my post.
I think he just used the word headcanon a little differently. Clearly meant your hypothetical scenario where its not an issue.I never said white privilege doesn't exist. In fact I obviously think it does exist, if you actually even tried to comprehend my post.
The last sentence of your post I quoted was a big lot of nothing
Hey if racism didn't exist wouldn't it be swell ? Why can't we just pretend racism doesn't exist !
Lol, I think you'll be ok.Just a side note:
What's with some cultures and this absolutely baffling practice of using a different language term to describe foreigners when conversing in English?
It doesn't add anything, does it?
The only purpose I can think of is to increase the othering in a statement, which seems like a bad thing
Meh, not always. Like anything, it can be used as a derogatory term or just to mean (white) foreigners. I use it all the time.Hah, the dictionary even adds "derogatory" to the definition for that word, so I guess it's a good example.
But it's not though because it changes the meaning. "Travelling beg-packers" would be a pleonasm; this is not.
Who mentioned white people? It's the same thing with the word "gaijin", which can refer to all ethnicities, not just white.Lol, I think you'll be ok.
Is "freedom not to be referred to as a foreigner when you're a foreigner" a form of white privilege?
Might just be my prejudice but I generally assume that it's a lot of well off white people who do this because they want to "experience" poverty. Most other people probably get enough of it at home I would think?
Kind of like how the rich had the "Live like a refugee" thing at Davos. It's just another fun/fascinating thing to experience for them.
But White privilege is a thing, and white begpackers exploit this, hence the video.Or in other words, if white privilege weren't a thing and anybody could "safely" beg-pack, beg-packing would still be just as lame.
Is "freedom not to be referred to as a foreigner when you're a foreigner" a form of white privilege?
There are plenty of Europeans and Americans that are not/do not look white. How are those factored into this/accounted for?.
Is it just a pleonasm though? Wouldn't that then imply that "yes, all bag-packers are white"? Most of 'em probably are, sure... but shouldn't you be addressing all of them rather than arbitrarily singling out a race, even if it probably covers most of them?
I'm guessing they're singling out white folk to make a point about white privilege, but the problem here isn't white privilege. The problem is beg-packing, white privilege merely shapes the demographic that engages in said practice. Or in other words, if white privilege weren't a thing and anybody could "safely" beg-pack, beg-packing would still be just as lame.
Trump's putting kids in cages and all that. Can't get mad about one foreigner (myself) referring to another foreigner by the word used for foreigners in the country I'm discussing (myself) at the time.I think he is referring to using a non-english word (while speaking english) for foreigner. Like some weebs do: "You don't understand anime you gajin"
Trump's putting kids in cages and all that. Can't get mad about one foreigner (myself) referring to another foreigner by the word used for foreigners in the country I'm discussing (myself) at the time.
Edit: and as a living embodiment of white privilege (myself) of course this is white privilege
It's not that weird. English as a language is littered with words pilfered from other languages to describe things it already had perfectly adequate words for.I am not saying you should get mad. He just thinks it is weird that an English speaking person speaking English is using a foreign language for the word foreigner.
It's not that weird. English as a language is littered with words pilfered from other languages to describe things it already had perfectly adequate words for.
So it is not weird to use to word 'Gaijin' for foreigner when speaking in English (as an English speaker)
Ok.
All according to keikaku I guess
But White privilege is a thing, and white begpackers exploit this, hence the video.
Why so riled?
I would posit that it is White privilege that enables beg-packing. Non-Whites won't get the same allowance to busk/begpack before the police start bothering them or the locals start complaining. Look at how non-White foreigners are treated in these countries. e.g. Nigerians in India or Filipinos in Korea. I've seen people asking for monetary help near colaba causeway in Bombay. The White looking tourists get sympathy, the non-white tourists are assumed to be slinging drugs. As for non-westerners, just the barrier for entry to foreign countries is much higher. Pre-arrival visa applications/interviews, proof of funds and employment in origin country, pre-arranged travel arrangements, etc.
I think he just used the word headcanon a little differently. Clearly meant your hypothetical scenario where its not an issue.
The last sentence of your post I quoted was a big lot of nothing
Hey if racism didn't exist wouldn't it be swell ? Why can't we just pretend racism doesn't exist !