just because the execs didnt like a movie and were wrong about it, doesnt mean they are wrong about it every time
WB has a pattern
just because the execs didnt like a movie and were wrong about it, doesnt mean they are wrong about it every time
Just throw a dart at any shitty movies WB has pumped out within the last 10 years. You'll probably land on one that had studio interfering and the director ended up complain about it after release.
I think that's a fine criticism, but ERA had a hate boner for it for the other reasons I mentioned before it even came out.
I'd argue the film doesn't need to say anything, and it's kind of a double standard it is expected too because it's not an action flick. It's a trip down a dark path this guy goes down on when society has failed him. It does't have to be anything other than a vacation into his darkness.
Thats wild...because I thought Joker was a great movie.I think that's a fine criticism, but ERA had a hate boner for it for the other reasons I mentioned before it even came out.
That was for Justice League.Correct, and they mandated it down to 2 hrs to get enough screenings in to make their annual bonuses. WB is run by a bunch of goddamn clowns.
Thank you! I'm glad someone thinks like me.this shot is horrendous. I assume it'll be done from a different angle in the movie.
Because you're supposed to be seeing it through the eyes of the gang that's behind the guy getting beaten.
I'll support the studio that came out with Fury Road, 2049 and Dune.
Ha, ha, yeah, that movie sucked!If these same execs thought wonder women 84 was a good film then really there opinion means Jack shit
Might be dating myself but this new generation of leakers seem to be speed running the Ain't it cool news handbook
Might be dating myself but this new generation of leakers seem to be speed running the Ain't it cool news handbook
After seeing WB let James Gunn loose for Suicide Squad I doubt they meddling that much. More likely they unsure how to market or franchise the movie
Might be dating myself but this new generation of leakers seem to be speed running the Ain't it cool news handbook
im very on the fence about this whole executives vs directors situation. There are enough examples of directors being reigned in that turned a movie for the better that its hard for me to be categorical about suits always 100% fucking up. Recent example is the powerpuff girls reboot, the whole creative team behind that was insane.
So Its a wait and see for me. I hope they get to the best product possible.
I mean yes they can, execs are just human beings who can absolutely have bad taste. At the end of the day, studio execs often HELP movies because giving a single person a free pass to make use of 200 million dollars to go make art is incredibly high risk and some level of feedback and focus testing can often help diminish that risk, no matter what the internet says about it. We only ever hear of the times it DIDN'T work out. WB has had a period of time with lots of creative issues on the executive layer, so it's entirely possible that the people there were just not very good at that part of the job.
Keaton Batman only needed one punch to take out one of these guys.
Why is Warner Bros so bad at this? They can't be cut from that different of a cloth from Sony or Disney.
Not to mention still giving Nolan whatever budget he needs to do his original blockbusters. I mean, how many chances did they give the Wachowski's despite all the flops they kept delivering after the Matrix trilogy. Not sure why WB all of sudden got this reputation of being a studio that meddles too much compared to others. They've been putting out the most daring and risky blockbusters more than any other studio for decades.I'll support the studio that came out with Fury Road, 2049 and Dune.
It feels like this is the most standard non-story you can get for any movie. There are always rumblings that executives aren't happy about a big movies whether it's a movie that breaks records commercially and critically or a huge flop. It's like internet 101 on how to generate interactions and doesn't really mean anything anyway.
They changed leadership last year. Jason KilarNot to mention still giving Nolan whatever budget he needs to do his original blockbusters. I mean, how many chances did they give the Wachowski's despite all the flops they kept delivering after the Matrix trilogy. Not sure why WB all of sudden got this reputation of being a studio that meddles too much compared to others. They've been putting out the most daring and risky blockbusters more than any other studio for decades.
They were dipping their hands into movies that were already shit in the first place though.
Having butchered BvS, Suicide Squad, and Justice League, Warner Bros. hungers for another DC film to chop to bits.