• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.

Deleted member 32561

User requested account closure
Banned
Nov 11, 2017
3,831
... The Rose line is great though?
Even if you don't agree with it, it totally fits the start eyed idealist she is.

Some of these edits sound okay (the Canto Bight chase for instance), but a lot of them I just disagree with on principle.
 

Yukiko™

Member
Oct 25, 2017
563
It's like every defense of tlj is "but the ot did this thing that was similar!"

ignoring the fact that it what was there worked in that movie and what's in tlj doesn't
 

kiguel182

Member
Oct 31, 2017
9,443
Removing that iron gag makes it better by default.

The changes are conservative but seem to make a lot of sense.
 

Seesaw15

Member
Oct 27, 2017
8,819
Does it remove the nonsensical story where the New Empire doesn't jump ahead of the rebel fleet and in which Star Wars space ships are running out of gas?

Or the part where BBQ pilots an AT-ST and kills dozens of people? (Why are there any flesh and blood pilots if that's an option?)

Both these things are covered/explored in the prequels.
 
Oct 27, 2017
42,700
...what's wrong with the caretakers?
Without the deleted scene they're kind of just there for the occasional comic relief of Rey destroying their shit. I don't have a problem with them, but even when I watched the movie, it seemed that they had a purpose that wasn't shown (before I knew about the scene)
 
Oct 25, 2017
9,422
I get the opening prank call joke was a bit much especially to start, but the caretakers, Porg stare, and especially the iron steam landing. How precious are you about Star Wars that Hardware Wars, a parody praised by Lucas, is too mean spirted and can't be referenced.
 

Epcott

Member
Oct 25, 2017
2,279
US, East Coast
Why remove the caretakers? What did they ever do to you?

A shame the cut alternate Phasma confrontation wasn't added and the Leia Poppins scene was removed (but that would disrupt the flow of the film). Also, the part with Snoke berating Hux should have stayed... it showed how strong Snoke was with the force and how demanding he was.

I watched the film again last Sunday, and didn't find it nearly as bad as I remembered. It was actually mildly enjoyable.
 

BocoDragon

Banned
Oct 26, 2017
5,207
The caretakers are removed :/

So you just want all the cute alien shit out of the movie, huh?

Some Star Wars fans don't actually want Star Wars... they want Star Trek. There's your 100% serious human drama in space, people. No cute shit to bother you.
 

Nairume

SaGa Sage
Member
Oct 25, 2017
6,944
The Rey's parents change just seems to be to keep the idea of them being alive?

I don't get it.
It's especially weird when you see this edit being defended as still maintaining Johnson's intentions for the story...but it then outright goes against one of the big things he did.
 

MisterHero

Member
Oct 25, 2017
6,934
Canto Bight should've been a city planet like Coruscant where Finn witnesses first hand what suffering and crazy laws the First Order has instituted. Make him choose the side of the Rebels rather than wasting time with DJ's lessons on moral ambiguity.

All the casino planet offers some animals being tortured and some child slaves but we don't care about their masters or whether they get punished. The enemy should have been the First Order, not some generic rich people.

Rose's lesson of "fighting for who we love" would've been stressed organically and might not have needed to be uttered at all.

Bah but now I'm discussing alternate takes, something that fan edits don't do. Just had to let this out somewhere, I guess. lol
 

Yukiko™

Member
Oct 25, 2017
563
Canto Bight should've been a city planet like Coruscant where Finn witnesses first hand what suffering and crazy laws the First Order has instituted. Make him choose the side of the Rebels rather than wasting time with DJ's lessons on moral ambiguity.

All the casino planet offers some animals being tortured and some child slaves but we don't care about their masters or whether they get punished. The enemy should have been the First Order, not some generic rich people.

Rose's lesson of "fighting for who we love" would've been stressed organically and might not have needed to be uttered at all.

Bah but now I'm discussing alternate takes, something that fan edits don't do. Just had to let this out somewhere, I guess. lol


I agree. A lot of the problem I have with tlj is not the concepts, but how they're executed.
 

Masterz1337

Member
Oct 25, 2017
4,817
- Removed Hux being berated by Snoke at the end of the opening sequence
I always liked this scene. Snoke is great and seeing him humiliate his underlings showed he is a whole different type of sadistic leader.

I'd be interested to check this out - I love TLJ but agree there's some weird comedy and pacing issues.

Hate TLJ, but this sounds much better. This seems to get rid of the stuff I hated and focuses more on the stuff I liked.
 

denx

Prophet of Truth
Member
Oct 27, 2017
6,322
The problem with Rose's line at the end is not just the line in and of itself, but also the moment at which it was delivered. It feels inappropiate when in the background the Resistance is about to get killed by a giant laser gun. Not to mention that this whole scene is sandwiched between Holdo's and Luke's sacrifice, which make it seem like the movie doesn't actually know what is trying to say about the theme of sacrifice.

Ideally that whole moment would just not had happened, but it did so cutting out Rose's corny line is the best that can be done I guess.

I don't get a lot of other changes tho. Why get rid of the caretakers? Chewie's moment with the porgs was one of the best comedic moments of the movie, why mess with that? What's the point of changing the way the Falcon's entrance on Crait is edited? And since they included some deleted scenes, why not put Luke's third lesson back in? Or Finn's moment with Phasma?
 

ZeoVGM

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
76,219
Providence, RI
I haven't seen a second of the edit, I completely agree with those last 2 points. Those scenes were just awful and Finn should have just died.

"He should have just died" means you completely missed the point of Rose saving him.

That whole part was pointless, as was most of the movie.

This doesn't make sense. Calling a film "pointless" is usually an empty critique that doesn't really mean anything.
 

Elandyll

Avenger
Oct 25, 2017
8,829
Most of these edits seem pointless to me. Especially Finn and Rose's moment at the end of the film, which is perfect.
The end line from Rose is deeply stupid though, when Holdo, minutes earlier, sacrified her life to save all of theirs (and minutes before Luke does just that), and of course in the background of her saying that, as she forces a kiss on Finn, the 12 remaining members of the Resistance are potentially burned to a crisp as the Ram fires on the base .
It's literally a farce imo.
 

CloudWolf

Member
Oct 26, 2017
15,640
Most of these changes I'm not opposed against tbh, except the one about Rey's parents. Nothing about that line seemingly clashes with TFA, for all we know the ship flying away in TFA with supposedly Rey's parents just went to a different place on Jakku.

This sounds absolutely awful.

Fan edits are almost always terrible.
Lies, Star Wars has some very good fan edits that return the OT to their somewhat original state.
 

Surfinn

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
28,590
USA
Like I said, that whole scene should changed. She can still get across the same general message against hate, but the line itself and the kiss was just bad. I felt their relationship, as more than just friends, was poorly built up. I think it's akin to Anne Hathaway's love explanation in Interstellar (although that wasn't as bad). It's a point that I had no problem being made, but the way it was written was awkward
If you don't like the line or the kiss, that's fine, but if we're talking about a fan edit with the explicit intention of improving the film, you better have a way of removing things without fucking up the flow, pacing or continuity.

As BossAttack said (hey, look, we agree again), people often don't think of these things and believe they're making improvements when they're not.

How do you show the base being blasted by the laser without showing the kiss.. Which is what the last like 15 min of the film led up to? And if you simply remove the line and not the kiss, Rose's kiss makes absolutely no sense at all and has no setup.
 
Last edited:

Plum

Member
May 31, 2018
17,309
It's like every defense of tlj is "but the ot did this thing that was similar!"

ignoring the fact that it what was there worked in that movie and what's in tlj doesn't

Yep

"But the original trilogy had jokes as well!" ignoring the fact that just because something is a joke does not mean that something is a good joke.

Though the "stupid TLJ fans want their space adventure movie to be a serious drama," arguments are a lot worse purely because of how needlessly condescending they are.
 

Arc

The Fallen
Oct 25, 2017
4,519
They added nothing. With the deleted scene raid fake-out, sure the caretakers actually had a point, but without it, they're just kinda there.

That's kind of empty criticism. They are part of the world of Ach-To. Are the dancers in Jabba's Palace pointless because they're just kind of there? You could apply that to anything that doesn't contribute to the plot.
 

Reven Wolf

The Fallen
Oct 25, 2017
4,563
That's kind of empty criticism. They are part of the world of Ach-To. Are the dancers in Jabba's Palace pointless because they're just kind of there? You could apply that to anything that doesn't contribute to the plot.
Not to mention they establish how the first Jedi temple is in such good condition despite the whole "for a thousand generations" duration.
 

falcondoc

Member
Oct 29, 2017
6,223
Changes sound great, except the Rey's parents on Jakku. That's an important/good part.

Rest of the film is pretty trash