It's a horrendous argument anyways. Jack follows thousands of people. I could cherrypick a few out of the list and declare he was anything that I wanted. It's meaningless.I think that's a pretty wrong way to think about this.
Twitter is worth nearly $15 billion. You don't make changes like this on a whim, even if you're the owner. Everything needs to be approved, seen how it may affect advertisers and traffic to the site, make sure they create a new set of ground rules that they can refer to instead of just saying "we don't like this person", etc.
Just because they took longer than you wanted and didn't rush to a snap judgment doesn't mean he's "practically an alt-righter."
So is this guy just a famous Neo Nazis or is there some other reason I should know who he is?
Maybe I don't get out enough, but I didn't know pepper spray could do permanent damage
I like that idea a lot.I think the verification system needs a serious re-working. Why the hell is "PeterSweden" still verified when he doesn't even have his actual name in his profile?
Just chucking some ideas into the mix to see if they stick... what if they had different coloured ticks for different accounts? So, a blue tick for a company, a green tick for a journalist with actual press credentials (e.g. National Visits Media Card, IFJ Press Card, ID card at an actual news outlet etc.), a grey tick for a celebrity who's frequently impersonated, a yellow tick for an elected politician.
Clearly the blue tick system isn't working. Twitter says it's about identity verification and nothing else, but it clearly denotes more than that implicitly.
Jack is absolutely an alt-righter. He follows some of the absolute scummiest alt-righters and it certainly isn't to monitor what they say and punish them as they say horrendous stuff on a daily basis and even dox people and Jack does nothing
I think the verification system needs a serious re-working. Why the hell is "PeterSweden" still verified when he doesn't even have his actual name in his profile?
Just chucking some ideas into the mix to see if they stick... what if they had different coloured ticks for different accounts? So, a blue tick for a company, a green tick for a journalist with actual press credentials (e.g. National Visits Media Card, IFJ Press Card, ID card at an actual news outlet etc.), a grey tick for a celebrity who's frequently impersonated, a yellow tick for an elected politician.
Clearly the blue tick system isn't working. Twitter says it's about identity verification and nothing else, but it clearly denotes more than that implicitly.
Does this mean that they will finally actually verify accounts that meet all criteria, like Candace Owens'? She's been trying, but they just won't do it. https://twitter.com/RedPillBlack She's out there, but she's not a supremacist last I checked.
"At" jack (since I can't use @ without summoning someone on Resetera) is practically an alt-righter himself. He dragged his feet on even removing these accounts' verified status.
If Twitter hadn't received so much scrutiny in recent times nothing would have been done at all.
Yeah they should be banned. But the meltdowns are pretty good.
DEAD.
Can you explain why that's the case? I legitimately do not understand.Counter trolling has become possible because they lost their "verified personality" status.
Think again. You've summoned me!"At" jack (since I can't use @ without summoning someone on Resetera) is practically an alt-righter himself. He dragged his feet on even removing these accounts' verified status.
If Twitter hadn't received so much scrutiny in recent times nothing would have been done at all.
Verification should be seen as that. Verifying the person is who they say. It shouldn't mean anything beyond that and all Twitter continues to do is give in to any outrage party that takes place.
I don't know about the rest, but Tommy Robinson is not a white supremacist.
Tens of thousands of nationalist demonstrators marched through Warsaw at the weekend to mark Poland's independence day, throwing red-smoke bombs and carrying banners with slogans such as "white Europe of brotherly nations".
Police estimated 60,000 people took part in Saturday's event, in what experts say was one of the biggest gathering of far-right activists in Europe in recent years.
Demonstrators with faces covered chanted "Pure Poland, white Poland!" and "Refugees get out!". A banner hung over a bridge that read: "Pray for Islamic Holocaust."
Among the far-right leaders attending the march was the former English Defence League leader Stephen Lennon, better known as Tommy Robinson, and Roberto Fiore from Italy. It also attracted a considerable number of supporters of Poland's governing conservative Law and Justice (PiS) party.
Does this mean that they will finally actually verify accounts that meet all criteria, like Candace Owens'? She's been trying, but they just won't do it. https://twitter.com/RedPillBlack She's out there, but she's not a supremacist last I checked.
English Defence League founder Tommy Robinson?I don't know about the rest, but Tommy Robinson is not a white supremacist.
English Defence League founder Tommy Robinson?
Let's check out his timelin---oh boy
Verification should be seen as that. Verifying the person is who they say. It shouldn't mean anything beyond that and all Twitter continues to do is give in to any outrage party that takes place.
Why are you concerned if she is verified or not?Does this mean that they will finally actually verify accounts that meet all criteria, like Candace Owens'? She's been trying, but they just won't do it. https://twitter.com/RedPillBlack She's out there, but she's not a supremacist last I checked.
Tweeting content that incites hate and harassment, includes violent or dangerous behavior, or violates Twitter's rules, could lead to removal of the verification badge.
Twitter's verification badge is a white check mark inside a blue icon next to someone's name indicating the company has verified the person's identity and that the account belongs to them. Celebrities, journalists, and popular personalities often receive the badge.
Kessler, who organized "Unite the Right" protest in Charlottesville, criticized the policy in a tweet. "Twitter has changed their verification policy just to be able to censor me," he said.
Twitter verified Kessler last week and users immediately complained.
"Verification has long been perceived as an endorsement," the company tweeted. "We gave verified accounts visual prominence on the service which deepened this perception. We should have addressed this earlier but did not prioritize the work as we should have."
Last week, the company suspended verification due to "confusion" over its policies. It is still not accepting public submissions for verification.
It's unclear why some Twitter users are losing their verification while others are removed from the site completely. Twitter declined to comment on that issue.