The way this sidebar in the Kotaku review is written is a bit eye-raising:
It sounds like the reviewer is implying that Nintendo might be lying about endgame content.
It doesn't sound like that at all. Don't try to drum up some controversy.
The way this sidebar in the Kotaku review is written is a bit eye-raising:
It sounds like the reviewer is implying that Nintendo might be lying about endgame content.
Any particular reason why? Not familiar with this person at all, just curious.
But most of the reviewes didn't even finish the 8 stories, at least a few admited during the review that they only finished X/8 stories.
Seriously
F*** Neogaf and Resetera when it's about reviews.
I mean it's not just review it's about "it's a JRPG it can't be 8/10" same as Assassin's Creed who need to be a BAD GAME since now he's the douchbag of gaming community even if Origins is awesome and Odyssey seems great, because IT'S NOT F******* EZIO
seriously guys come on, look at yourselves, this topic is insane!
I think the review threads here get pretty ridiculous too but it's not that deep. The game has pretty positive reviews and if you're excited for the game then be excited, don't get twisted up over this.What the actual fuckidy f*** about "not a big story"?
I find this cool it's like Ali Baba and the 40 thieves
There is a lot of difference between even FFIV and FFVI when it comes to dungeon design.A lot of the stuff people are complaining about seem like they dont like RPGS or prefer the new ones.
You cant be wanting an old school JRPG revival without grinding and some repetition.
Stick with Final Fantasy XV
Seriously
F*** Neogaf and Resetera when it's about reviews.
I mean it's not just review it's about "it's a JRPG it can't be 8/10" same as Assassin's Creed who need to be a BAD GAME since now he's the douchbag of gaming community even if Origins is awesome and Odyssey seems great, because IT'S NOT F******* EZIO
seriously guys come on, look at yourselves, this topic is insane!
He was also positive about JRPGs other people disliked. That just means he has different taste in JRPGs than you, and that means a review from him can be valuable to those with that same taste.
What the hell is Primrose's Bewildering Grace and Cait? I feel like this is a crucial information I need before starting a playthrough and plotting my path across 8 characters.
True.But most of the reviewes didn't even finish the 8 stories, at least a few admited during the review that they only finished X/8 stories.
Relax.What the actual fuckidy f*** about "not a big story"?
I find this cool it's like Ali Baba and the 40 thieves
What the hell is Primrose's Bewildering Grace and Cait? I feel like this is a crucial information I need before starting a playthrough and plotting my path across 8 characters.
The counter example is FFVII itself. Honestly, people really forgot what made FF games special. FF games have a tons of variety. Even your structure is wrong for FF. Your party changes throughout the journey, the gameplay changes. You have stealth sections, dressing cloud up as a girl, the strategy mini games, gold saucer, vehicle mini game, chocobo breeding etc. These games are well paced, ensuring you keep your attention.Yeah... his complaints do seem mostly like "its a JPRG". I mean do FFV or VI or VII dungeons really get complex? Don't they follow the same structure: Explore Town > Dunegon > Boss > Story Event > Repeat ?
That's pretty much how "old school" JRPGs worked. Can someone provide a counter example? I mean even the beloved Chrono Trigger can be summed up the same way.
As far as I know they are all worth the same, that's why the '' drama '' of when Jim Sterling analyzed BOTW85 MC after 31 reviews. Think the addition of the IGN review boosted them up a point, since I believe IGN would have a rather large weight in MC's review system.
Many classic JRPGs don't require grinding, you fight the enemies along your way and you should get enough exp. No need for extra grinding. Even those that do vary in the amount of grinding needed. Stop making it sounds like every JRPG is a grindfest. Seriously did you grind in Chrono Trigger?Its a jrpg....
Thats why alot of people dont knock the score down for that. This definitely aint your kinda game anyway
I played FFIX three times and never reached level 60 when I fought the final boss. In fact in one low-level run my average level was below 20.Yes(?) I used to play IX yearly and I had my grinding spot where I got everyone to level 60 to 70.
It is a fact that the stories are entirely standalone. There are a few references and shared NPCs across the stories, but the stories do not intersect at all.
You're probably thinking of the optional vignettes that you can watch during each chapter, which is the only time that your characters interact.
I completed all eight stories (32 chapters) and did a handful of optional dungeons. My game's clock is at 36 hours, three minutes.
Yeah, that ridiculous anime girl is pretty absurd. Hope they change it too.Is this seriously the game icon? I hope they update it:
https:///wp-content/uploads/2018/06/shining-resonance-refrain-octopath-traveler-wolfenstein-ii-icons-1-1024x576.jpg
Seems like it takes about 35-40 hours to beat it all and much of is grinding. It seems to fall in line with what the demo offered.
The demo offered a glimpse of what the game was about. A cheaply produced JPRG with a pixel-based artstyle reminiscent of 16 bit RPGs putting gameplay before storytelling. The 8 stories being actually short, the characters not interacting much between each others, the dungeons being simple and repetitive, much of the game being grinding, much of the NPCs around the world cannot be talked too, story sequences ignoring you have a party with you all seem to imply they had to cut corners to make it.
It mirrors how the ugly basic cartridge looks too.Is this seriously the game icon? I hope they update it:
https:///wp-content/uploads/2018/06/shining-resonance-refrain-octopath-traveler-wolfenstein-ii-icons-1-1024x576.jpg
They're not:As far as I know they are all worth the same, that's why the '' drama '' of when Jim Sterling analyzed BOTW
I doubt IGN and Gamespot wouldn't get a higher weight than non-mainstream outlets tbh.Metacritic said:Metascore is a weighted average in that we assign more importance, or weight, to some critics and publications than others, based on their quality and overall stature. In addition, for music and movies, we also normalize the resulting scores (akin to "grading on a curve" in college), which prevents scores from clumping together.
I agree, I see why some people are disappointed with Xc2 and some of the game's decisions (even if I love the game). On the other hand, saying that Ni no Kuni 2 is a very good RPG is far beyond me.And frankly using Xenoblade 2 as a barometer whether to trust someone's review is kind of awkward.
Each chapter does not take an hour. Many of them took me 20-30 minutes.Eh....?
8 characters + 4 chapters each.
1 chapter = around one hour
so 32 hours.
+ optional dungeons
2 hours
So 34 hours
and 2 hours of "grindy battles" ???
total 36 hours...?
Something doesn't add up here!
It doesn't sound like that at all. Don't try to drum up some controversy.
Light theme userIs this seriously the game icon? I hope they update it:
https:///wp-content/uploads/2018/06/shining-resonance-refrain-octopath-traveler-wolfenstein-ii-icons-1-1024x576.jpg