While that is bad this thread is about channels that are simulating abuse on actual childrenThere is a kids video were Spiderman spanks Elsa and then slaps her on the face. Then she puts a clothes peg on his dick. This is actual people playing these characters btw. It's fucking weird
There's overlap between the two things, I believe. Like, these guys are all grinding out videos with common repetitive elements so they can game the algorithm system, even the live action acted ones like the dude who got shut down. It just all ends up feeling like the same endless nonsense random word salad given sentience.I thought this was gonna be about those Elsa and Spiderman videos that get crazy amounts of hits. This is just fucked up.
Agreed. This and incestual sister porn has me always asking "Are there really THAT many people into this!?!?"
It's actually very possible, but it would mean cutting down on those gangbuster profits. but we are so brainwashed to the point where we think that 'gee, they're too big, all they can do is throw their hands up in the air :/'YouTube gets five billion hits per day. It is simply not possible to police an open platform like that, or any other on social media.
While the parenting is an aspect, it's not feasible to watch your child literally every second of every day. These videos appear as related videos even with parenting settings enabled.This is horrible, but honestly is also a failure in parenting. Who are these parents that let their kids go on hours watching YouTube unsupervised?
Algorithms are not the way to screen content for children. It requires actual people screening the content. Like we as a society agreed upon with television ratings. Youtube has more than enough money to employ the necessary people. YouTube has a chance to do this before they bring regulators down upon themselves.
Yeah I get that. Just was hoping it got got at the same time. All this shit is nastyWhile that is bad this thread is about channels that are simulating abuse on actual children
A YouTube algorithm can Shazam your prince song and know it's copyrighted. Youtubers that shoot their own video have no content for YouTube to compare to. The only way to catch this stuff thus far has been to sit an actual human being down to watch these videos and people with these jobs tend to either quit within months or require counseling and therapy.I had a Prince song on my channel for a hot minute. instantly taken down. But this shit flies? Seems like they've taken the Steam school of marketing and promotion.
This guy deserves to rot, what a horrible excuse for a human being.Men, even if he isn't mentioned here fuck daddy of five or whatever his name was
The other problem is that people are shit. I hope the cops get involved.It's things like this that make me believe social media companies don't have the best interests of their users at heart
September 11, 2017
The couple behind the controversial "DaddyOFive" YouTube channel were sentenced to five years of probation on charges of child neglect in Frederick County Circuit Court on Monday.
Michael and Heather Martin of Ijamsville entered Alford pleas to two counts of child neglect each — charges that stem from "prank" videos that caused a viral outcry from viewers who thought they amounted to child abuse. Under their Alford pleas, the Martins maintain their innocence while acknowledging that prosecutors have enough evidence to win a conviction.
Frederick County Assistant State's Attorney Lindy Angel said that an investigation into the Martins began in April after "various sources" alerted the Frederick County Sheriff's Office to Michael Martin's YouTube channel, "DaddyOFive." In more than 300 now-deleted videos, the Martins were seen destroying an Xbox, and berating and cursing at two of their five children. In other videos, Michael Martin is seen pushing his son Cody Martin into a bookcase, giving him a bloody nose and ordering one of his stepsons to slap his daughter, Emma Martin, in what he deemed a game.
Angel said that a neuropsychologist who worked with Frederick County Child Protective Services during the investigation found that 11-year-old Emma and 10-year-old Cody Martin, the biological children of Michael Martin and the stepchildren of Heather Martin, had experienced "observable, identifiable and substantial impairments of their mental or psychological ability to function."
"It became correlated directly to the behavior and actions of the defendants, the Martins," Angel said.
The Martins received a five-year suspended sentence for each charge. Frederick County Circuit Judge Theresa M. Adams ruled that, under the terms of the couple's probation, the Martins could not have contact with Emma, Cody or the children's biological mother, Rose Hall, unless permitted by a court. Adams also said the Martins cannot post video recordings or images of Emma and Cody to social media unless it is for legitimate family purposes, and that the couple should submit evaluations and adhere to mental health treatment as advised by their supervising agent.
Represented by defense attorney Stephen R. Tully, Michael Martin and a teary-eyed Heather Martin entered the courtroom around 10:45 a.m. Michael Martin handed her a box of tissues.
Tully said after the hearing that he thought the ruling brought justice to all parties. He said what the Martins displayed in their videos was negligent, but not intentional, and that they've learned to "be careful with children and social media."
Tully said he will file a motion soon asking the judge to consider dismissing or reducing the sentences and/or expunging charges from their records should the Martins abide by the conditions of their probation. If the Martins violate their probation, they could face up to 10 years in prison, but Tully said he felt "comfortable" that the Martins would adhere to the terms.
Angel said she also was pleased with the results of the hearing.
"When we began the investigation, I don't think anyone was certain there was criminal [activity]," she said, but the psychologist's reports made the state pursue neglect charges.
"I think everyone's interests are served, both the Martins as defendants and the state's interest in protecting the children," she said. "I think it was a fair result for everyone."
I mean, if this stuff has gotten so many views, then it's probably been recommended to people through their algorithm. It's certainly never been recommended to me, so there's something in the algorithm that says that this is not fit for Uhyve.If they can put together an algorithm that can pick up and auto-block copyrighted content, surely they can create an algorithm that can detect specific content?
YouTube gets five billion hits per day. It is simply not possible to police an open platform like that, or any other on social media.
They have images in the OP's articles. They're...horrible.Can someone msg me an example of these videos? I'm really confused about what these are
In other videos, the children are kidnapped, or made to 'play doctor' with an adult. The videos frequently include gross-out themes like injections, eating feces, or needles. Many come from YouTube 'verified' channels and have tens of millions of views.
As someone who has grown up alongside the platform and has published content on Youtube for almost a decade now, I agree that this is abhorrent and incredibly creepy.
However, the bigger problem to me is that I am having a hard time understanding why parents feel comfortable enough to let their kids watch YouTube in the first place - is it just a lack of education on their part or willful ignorance? The entire premise of the platform is that anyone can upload videos and share their content. That's the core of why the platform is so great and has done so many life changing things for so many people. It's not regulated by the FCC and there is no real penalty for violating Youtubes' guidelines other than having their account shut down, which might as well be inconsequential to the majority of people. If you're creating content for children and you publish questionable content that's clearly not intended for children on YouTube, you will have your account removed or the video deleted. If you somehow manage to broadcast mature content on television aimed at children, you're automatically looking at severe legal repercussions.
Therefore, because the penalties are not equivalent one would assume that creeps and trolls would be more prevalent in one platform than the other. Why even take the chance that your kid could stumble onto something nefarious that could negatively affect them growing up? Would you rather have your child watching programming that has gone through an approval committee by a public corporation that protects its brand name and has actual stake in whether or not the content is age appropriate or watching content created by some weird 40 year old living by himself in rural Arkansas with no board of directors to answer to, no real aversion to online scrutiny, no job on the line to lose, and no real meaningful consequences if he gets caught?
I don't have kids but if I did I cannot even remotely fathom letting them watch YouTube at such a young age without constant supervision. Why not just put them in front of the TV instead if you need to relax? Like honestly, is this just lazy/ignorant parenting or am I missing something here?
WHAT!? I'm pretty knowledgeable about Youtube stuff, but this completely passed me by. How the fuck was something with tens of millions of views allowed to go on for so long?
Edit: Seems I may have misunderstood the severity of these. If they're just animations and weird acting, that's certainly a lot more acceptable even if it's kind of fucked up. Thought this was another Daddy o Five situation, but much worse.
You mean those "modeling" sites? Yeaaaah that shit was big in the late 90s/early 2000s that walked a fine line between legal and porn existing in a gray area until IIRC laws were updated, there was a crackdown in I think the mid, maybe late 2000s where several people involved with those sites (mostly the "photographers" who usually ran those sites) got arrested and went to prison. Unfortunately laws passed here didn't do anything for garbage produced outside the US, like in South America or especially Eastern Europe which was way worse, I know several European countries cracked down as well but not enough. Then there's those Chan sites, including the original...the fuck?
reminds me of some shit I stumbled upon years and years ago. There are sites out there that aren't child porn, but are. Like photo shoots of little kids in "outfits". At the time I assumed they were clearly visible on the web so they must be legal...but man I wish I had reported it.
Algorithms are not the way to screen content for children. It requires actual people screening the content. Like we as a society agreed upon with television ratings. Youtube has more than enough money to employ the necessary people. YouTube has a chance to do this before they bring regulators down upon themselves.
These are not animated videos, its real kids and people. It's very similar to Daddy o Five.
For situations like this I recommend the video blocker extension for Chrome. Can outright block content from ever appearing on YT, even in the sidebar, based on entered keywords and channel names.My daughter tried watching Toy Freaks a lot. Disturbing and annoying as fuck. I never did see anything that would make me freak out, but the kids always acted in a manner that made me lose faith in people's abilities to properly parent. Rude yelling, throwing food, and hitting each other. I always made her change it.
And at the end of the vids, the dad would always come on with his creepy voice saying things like "wanna know what happens to this little girl? Subscribe now.."
YouTube was a mistake
My trouble is, she's watching it on her Android tabletFor situations like this I recommend the video blocker extension for Chrome. Can outright block content from ever appearing on YT, even in the sidebar, based on entered keywords and channel names.
While the parenting is an aspect, it's not feasible to watch your child literally every second of every day. These videos appear as related videos even with parenting settings enabled.
I am personally very disturbed that the audience for these videos are millions of people.