I want to recommend and vouch for the Audio Technica ATH MSR7. Purely for "soundwhoring" (That is, for competitive gaming). According to Audio Technica they're a closed 'phone, but i think most would agree that it's somewhat of a hybrid. I'm not sure how much sound they leak but you can absolutely hear your surroundings.
If you've read the recommendations by mad lust envy over at head-fi (yea yea..), the ones that tops the tests are AKG Q701 (and all those derivatives) and Audio Technica ATH-AD700(X) when it comes to spatial awareness (or soundstage).
I haven't tried the AKG but i do own the AD700's. They're truly amazing for that purpose only, of giving an edge in competitive gaming, but they lack everywhere else. The comfort is shitty, the shape is idiotic (made for a decently sized watermelon), absolutely no bass, leaks (yea they're open so expected) and listening to music or anything other than pure comp gaming is terrible. I actually prefer neutral-bright and bright headphones but i do not enjoy these at all.
Enter, the MSR7.
So yea, the MSR7 are super bright aswell but with added bass, more specifically a fantastic sub bass (is that what it's called btw?). I personally hate bass and both V-shaped or U-shaped 'phones, and these hit just the right amount. Maybe slightly more oomph would make them the great all-rounder that i have come to love.
The soundstage are on par but just a smidge worse than the AD700's, meaning they're extremely worth it for competitive. The added bass makes them enjoyable both for music and movies (although for movies i'd look for something with more bass i guess).
Detachable cable is a plus as well. You get three different cables. One short, one long and one with mic + phone controls. Although i'm not sure it has a mic, i haven't really used it but i recall it being advertised.
So they're basically as good as AD700's, don't leak as much and makes them usable in other situations.
The downside? Well they're frequently priced at what? $200-250+? (I'm EU so i'm not sure). At that price range i'm sure there's better alternatives.
But! They are usually heavily discounted. Last year i got them for about $120 during black friday in fact, and i see that they've dropped down to that price range this year again.
Which makes them exceptionally cheap. If you can get them for sub $150 they're a steal imo.
Comfort is also an issue. I've come to love Audio Technicas gear over the years but they are absolutely clueless when it comes to comfort. I thought i had started to suffer from chronic headaches that where almost worse than migraines, only it was 24/7. Turns out the MSR7 clamps at a certain point which after a year of having them on 8-10 hours a day finally started to affect me. If you search for MSR7 mods there's guides on how to bend them so they fit properly and there's also this (which i've yet to try)
https://alexanderdarks.wordpress.co...-during-long-sessions-for-about-five-dollars/
You could also invest in a pair of brainwavz hm5 pads. I sold mine before i had a chance to try them out on these phones but i'm considering buying a new pair. Loved how they felt.
They're creaky as all hell. You'll get used to it.
Also, they're easy to drive! I have them connected only to a external soundcard (NI komplete audio 6), but they work just as fine on my phone.
EDIT:
Don't be put off by reviews. I've seen some saying they're fantastic but also a lot saying they're mediocre.
Thing is, they are comparing it to $200+ phones. Which is perfectly fine since they're usually at that price point.
And they're basically only tested for music, which yea, there's probably better in the $200+ range for that (but at that price point i'd argue it comes down to personal taste).
It's the value attached since they're usually priced at about 120-140, which makes them exceptionally good. And they compete with the best comp gaming phones out there. There's such a negligible difference that i shouldn't really mention it.
But beware, they're bright, really bright. Exceptionally bright since they're considered closed (which isn't really true).
If you're looking for "hi-fi cinematic" sound (heavy on the bass and whatnot), these aren't for you. They are the perfect competitive gaming 'phone with slight compromise to make them enjoyable for other things.
Some say they need burn-in but i've always thought burn-in was a myth? Isn't it just you getting used to the soundscape? Anyways if you're getting 'em and they seem shrill and suffer from sibilance, give them some time.
The AD700X/AKG Q701 (and derivatives) are exceptionally worse. Well, i dunno about AKG but they look so similar to AD700s and share the same score for soundstage and brightness so i'd wager they sound extremely similar.
...God i love these 'phones.
If you've read the recommendations by mad lust envy over at head-fi (yea yea..), the ones that tops the tests are AKG Q701 (and all those derivatives) and Audio Technica ATH-AD700(X) when it comes to spatial awareness (or soundstage).
I haven't tried the AKG but i do own the AD700's. They're truly amazing for that purpose only, of giving an edge in competitive gaming, but they lack everywhere else. The comfort is shitty, the shape is idiotic (made for a decently sized watermelon), absolutely no bass, leaks (yea they're open so expected) and listening to music or anything other than pure comp gaming is terrible. I actually prefer neutral-bright and bright headphones but i do not enjoy these at all.
Enter, the MSR7.
So yea, the MSR7 are super bright aswell but with added bass, more specifically a fantastic sub bass (is that what it's called btw?). I personally hate bass and both V-shaped or U-shaped 'phones, and these hit just the right amount. Maybe slightly more oomph would make them the great all-rounder that i have come to love.
The soundstage are on par but just a smidge worse than the AD700's, meaning they're extremely worth it for competitive. The added bass makes them enjoyable both for music and movies (although for movies i'd look for something with more bass i guess).
Detachable cable is a plus as well. You get three different cables. One short, one long and one with mic + phone controls. Although i'm not sure it has a mic, i haven't really used it but i recall it being advertised.
So they're basically as good as AD700's, don't leak as much and makes them usable in other situations.
The downside? Well they're frequently priced at what? $200-250+? (I'm EU so i'm not sure). At that price range i'm sure there's better alternatives.
But! They are usually heavily discounted. Last year i got them for about $120 during black friday in fact, and i see that they've dropped down to that price range this year again.
Which makes them exceptionally cheap. If you can get them for sub $150 they're a steal imo.
Comfort is also an issue. I've come to love Audio Technicas gear over the years but they are absolutely clueless when it comes to comfort. I thought i had started to suffer from chronic headaches that where almost worse than migraines, only it was 24/7. Turns out the MSR7 clamps at a certain point which after a year of having them on 8-10 hours a day finally started to affect me. If you search for MSR7 mods there's guides on how to bend them so they fit properly and there's also this (which i've yet to try)
https://alexanderdarks.wordpress.co...-during-long-sessions-for-about-five-dollars/
You could also invest in a pair of brainwavz hm5 pads. I sold mine before i had a chance to try them out on these phones but i'm considering buying a new pair. Loved how they felt.
They're creaky as all hell. You'll get used to it.
Also, they're easy to drive! I have them connected only to a external soundcard (NI komplete audio 6), but they work just as fine on my phone.
EDIT:
Don't be put off by reviews. I've seen some saying they're fantastic but also a lot saying they're mediocre.
Thing is, they are comparing it to $200+ phones. Which is perfectly fine since they're usually at that price point.
And they're basically only tested for music, which yea, there's probably better in the $200+ range for that (but at that price point i'd argue it comes down to personal taste).
It's the value attached since they're usually priced at about 120-140, which makes them exceptionally good. And they compete with the best comp gaming phones out there. There's such a negligible difference that i shouldn't really mention it.
But beware, they're bright, really bright. Exceptionally bright since they're considered closed (which isn't really true).
If you're looking for "hi-fi cinematic" sound (heavy on the bass and whatnot), these aren't for you. They are the perfect competitive gaming 'phone with slight compromise to make them enjoyable for other things.
Some say they need burn-in but i've always thought burn-in was a myth? Isn't it just you getting used to the soundscape? Anyways if you're getting 'em and they seem shrill and suffer from sibilance, give them some time.
The AD700X/AKG Q701 (and derivatives) are exceptionally worse. Well, i dunno about AKG but they look so similar to AD700s and share the same score for soundstage and brightness so i'd wager they sound extremely similar.
...God i love these 'phones.
Last edited: