well imma go sleep now and i sure aint gonna be up before the days end.
lets see ow this one turn out ay?
vote: turmoil7
lets see ow this one turn out ay?
vote: turmoil7
Pineapple on pizza, gotcha
not really
nah, it should be easy, but it never is - there's always someone more obvious to vote when you're scum, and scum doesn't want to bus you because you're useful. Why would they? So you linger. If you're town, great for us; if not, we are, as usual, probs boned.Even Monkey waffles on whether I'm an easy lynch/bus or not :V
this is your sixth post, son; if you wanna be here, be herenot really
id was gonna put a vote on lp last night but im even hesitant to do that since like you guys have said im not even here
not really
id was gonna put a vote on lp last night but im even hesitant to do that since like you guys have said im not even here
Pretty sure waffles is monkey's last name. I don't think I've played a game with you where you haven't gone to endgame though so not really sure where it comes from. Guess I should read more other games.Even Monkey waffles on whether I'm an easy lynch/bus or not :V
Although that holds up.nah, it should be easy, but it never is - there's always someone more obvious to vote when you're scum, and scum doesn't want to bus you because you're useful. Why would they? So you linger. If you're town, great for us; if not, we are, as usual, probs boned.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
So you not playing the game proves that you're town? Interesting strategy.Dr. Monkey you're right about me not liking playing as scum, but I would be more likely to try and put up a veneer of towniness when I'm a baddie. You'll see when I flip.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
If I don't know something for certain, I'm gonna keep entertaining other possibilities, jfc
(though I stand by mine: this is the day scum knows the least about the setup and are most likely to mess up their claims)
"Doubling down" is a pretty fucking disingenuous way to put that. We have people already checked out for the day, it is literally impossible for it to happen. All I said is that I don't think it was that shit, although it was an idea based on my quick google reading of fucking up c9 setups and how the knowing or not knowing of SK can bork scum. Asking people to at least consider the systems we have in play or some strategy is not less scummy than openly bragging about doing jackshit but you do you.I'm home and it's time to lynch scum.
I'll catch up, but I saw fep's most recent post and he doubled down on his mass claim idea:
Please walk me through how scum would mess up their claims, because I don't see it. The best you get is a group of PRs... maybe 2 and they contradict themselves? This way you get at worst 1:1 scum. Why would scum try this? The other scenario is a huge group of townies. That way the PRs MAYBE are more trustworthy, but the nk list is set for days to come - and you expose those PRs. It comes down to thinking you'd catch all of scum fast enough before the PRs are killed?
You will have to explain how these thing are the same(you or stan, monki, sorian, Am I forgetting someone?, I am talking of following brazil and thinking that brazil is infallible being uncompatible ideas). brb burden of proof
Should I try to look scum?
Isn't Stan literally always aggressive, though? This isn't the first game I've been in that someone's mentioned town-reading Stan very incisively on D1, and that confused me, because I don't see anything alignment-indicative in his posture.Would not lynch - it's a small list:
- Stan - Stan's aggressive so far and I pretty firmly town-read aggro Stan
Nope, he's not always aggressive.Isn't Stan literally always aggressive, though? This isn't the first game I've been in that someone's mentioned town-reading Stan very incisively on D1, and that confused me, because I don't see anything alignment-indicative in his posture.
Please explain:
Nope, he's not always aggressive.
Please explain:
is two people a pile?
how it is sketch? what is sketch about it?
why the rac votes and no others?
You're supposed to be our trusted voice and you are largely absent; when you reappear, it's with a one-line drive-by. We need you, Brazil, not because you're infallible but because we can at least trust the source.
Let me start a conversation with you here: I put a vote on rac that was clearly a prod - see the text along with it. Sorian, who'd mentioned rac before, jumps on. Wants to know his alignment. Mentions a possible connection to LP but does not explain. I've learned to be very suspicious of Sorian supporting/agreeing with me; this bothers me. So if you find any part of this sketch, I'd like to hear what and why and how.
Now it's even a townie move to shut down discussion, because as scum you'd do otherwise of course. I'll keep that in mind, yes, we disagree.We'll have to agree to disagree. Trash conversation actively detracts from scum hunting, that's literally how I fool a lot of you most of the time.
How do you want to lynch scum if it's LP + Comrade? Your suspect pool from the start of the game were 9 players?For Comrade, you can policy lynch him if you want but that's about the best you'll get. It doesn't matter if you want to give him a free pass or not. He's going to pop in, say some nonsensical stuff, throw out a non commital accusation, then disappear for a day. I haven't had to lynch him as scum yet but I assume it's like anyone else that doesn't give me much to read (Star, lp, Kyan, etc.), finding him out will be through connections, not as a first point of contact.
L_P has an underscore, will the vote tool handle it correctly if someone else votes for him? Fireblendeh lynching an inactive player is best for day one
but im right there again so, yeah
vote: Lone Prodigy
You undeniable said Brazil chooses the lynch of the day 'till his death (#124) With that being said you implicitly rule out that you disagree with him and would oppose him because he's confirmed town.
In this post you throw away your own oppinion and put all the burden towards Brazil, which would be an easy way to dismiss vote patterns in the future.
The phrase "trying to look town" is definitely something that is written in scum chats and I can't remember having read this in a game before. I connect this sentence to a scum mindset, hence you seem suspicious using it.
Care to explain how you rate that rather than stating the obvious?
Saw your explanation about throwing around theories, that's such a wobbly explanation, could come from whatever alignment, defensive? Asking for feedback or trying to steer the discussion. I've said more above.I'm gonna go ahead and
Vote: Oliver James
Lots of shitposts, maybe one legit so far. Tell me more.
That was a joke :PPlease explain:
is two people a pile?
how it is sketch? what is sketch about it?
why the rac votes and no others?
You're supposed to be our trusted voice and you are largely absent; when you reappear, it's with a one-line drive-by. We need you, Brazil, not because you're infallible but because we can at least trust the source.
Let me start a conversation with you here: I put a vote on rac that was clearly a prod - see the text along with it. Sorian, who'd mentioned rac before, jumps on. Wants to know his alignment. Mentions a possible connection to LP but does not explain. I've learned to be very suspicious of Sorian supporting/agreeing with me; this bothers me. So if you find any part of this sketch, I'd like to hear what and why and how.
Yeah, no, I agree with you there. I've had to work harder and longer than I had anticipated these last couple of days, so I apologize for that. I'll be active here until day end (and probably my own life's end), though.(note: had typed up what is the second half there before you responded re: stan, Brazil, so you can mitigate the "one-line drive-by" but man I still really would like to hear more from you here)
No, the vote tool will count it separately from votes for LP with an underscore. Since intent takes precedence, for game purposes it will count as a vote, but since this presents legibility issues for those using the vote tool and vote counts going forward, do correct the vote to his proper spelling, racL_P has an underscore, will the vote tool handle it correctly if someone else votes for him? Fireblend
You too, mhm? I don't see this defensive play from Oliver. Reading what he posted makes me lean more into townie territory here
sorry copied it from the first postNo, the vote tool will count it separately from votes for LP with an underscore. Since intent takes precedence, for game purposes it will count as a vote, but since this presents legibility issues for those using the vote tool and vote counts going forward, do correct the vote to his proper spelling, rac
Thanks :)
i dont like the monkey vote eitherI'm all for waffling, especially when you're close to mylo. But D1 is such a random madhouse it's better to take a hard stance, even if it the wrong stance.
Or you could just pick the guy with the lest posts like rac.
Now it's even a townie move to shut down discussion, because as scum you'd do otherwise of course. I'll keep that in mind, yes, we disagree.
How do you want to lynch scum if it's LP + Comrade? Your suspect pool from the start of the game were 9 players?
At least I see your reasoning for rac in this post, meta. Probably better to read everything before talking about your rac or turmoil position.
Care to explain how you rate that rather than stating the obvious?
Saw your explanation about throwing around theories, that's such a wobbly explanation, could come from whatever alignment, defensive? Asking for feedback or trying to steer the discussion. I've said more above.
Furthermore: that's all you get from Oliver to that point?