You mean like Assassins Creed, Call of Duty, FIFA, and many other franchises that addapted properly to 21st century?
Micro-transactions I assume is what you are talking about?
You mean like Assassins Creed, Call of Duty, FIFA, and many other franchises that addapted properly to 21st century?
Is this the Pokémon game Nintendo was talking about last year?
To make Origins, they had to stop releasing yearly ACs. CoD is the same game every year. FIFA is the same game every year. Don't say they innovate, 'cause they don't.You mean like Assassins Creed, Call of Duty, FIFA, and many other franchises that addapted properly to 21st century?
It's a trojan horse my first pokemon to bait go players and lapsed fans into a switch and the main game next yearI didn't no true scotsman anything, I never said you can't like these games and older games.
Pretending like these games aren't being developed for people who don't like the series in mind is silly.
I mean it's just a gentle flip of your Switch/controller.Can someone confirm if the motion controls for catching a pokémon are mandatory? If so it could be my deal breaker
I have never been more tempted to just post a wojack in response.
Don't mislead people. This is the core game they were talking about last year. Maybe it's difficult to accept it, but it is what it is.
It's a trojan horse my first pokemon to bait go players and lapsed fans into a switch and the main game next year
I don't know, it sure seems like that is part of their intentions, otherwise they wouldn't have cut wild battles and made capturing and battling completely seperate things like Go. We are saying the same thing, you're just saying it nicer than I am.These games are being developed for a broader audience. They aren't being developed for people who don't like the core premise of the franchise.
he is probably talking about graphics.To make Origins, they had to stop releasing yearly ACs. CoD is the same game every year. FIFA is the same game every year. Don't say they innovate, 'cause they don't.
That doesn't have anything to do the really bad point you attempted to make and random battles =/= a lack of being able to fight wild Pokemon.
LmaoEveryone expecting a Pokemon game with BOTW standards for 2019.
I want a time machine, just to see the face of dissappointment next year.
If GF is continuing making Pokemon games, you won't see a major step forward in the series, specially if every new game sells like 20 million copies.
At the end, this is is all our fault, we allowed this by giving them our money...just like lootboxes.
You mean like Assassins Creed, Call of Duty, FIFA, and many other franchises that addapted properly to 21st century?
jay leno everybody, give it upThey should've called it "Pokemon Stay" instead of "Pokemon Let's Go".
Pokemon Stay
- Stay indoors
- Stay in Kanto
- Stay unconnected to strangers
- Stay with our previous game please
So, without Wild Battles. The remaining reasonable way to grind should be trainer battles, so it shouldn't be illogical to conclude that rematches will be a core part of these games, right?
I'm sure there are other ways to grind, but I can't see battles stopping the main grinding method.
I'm also looking forward to see how catching will progress to the game. It won't just be a matter of throwing balls and timing, I'm sure some degree of strategy will be required.
Other yearly franchises don't look nearly this weak, so what does this even mean.
Don't mislead people. This is the core game they were talking about last year. Maybe it's difficult to accept it, but it is what it is.
Considering the things that are being cheered on in this thread, I doubt it.Right, it's a bridge title from Pokemon GO to the core RPG series. Maybe those fans will go on to play Gen 8 next year too.
Is there a link to that?Game Freak said during the Q & A that it wasn't and that the 2019 game has been in development for longer than the Switch has been on the market. (Probably around 2016)
To make Origins, they had to stop releasing yearly ACs. CoD is the same game every year. FIFA is the same game every year. Don't say they innovate, 'cause they don't.
They're called random battles for a reason. Fighting your allies is dumb from a logical perspective. So the Pokemon you accidentally faint, you have to leave behind because you can't catch them? It's dumb.That doesn't have anything to do the really bad point you attempted to make and random battles =/= a lack of being able to fight wild Pokemon.
Though to be fair I don't really get how you do rarity with Pokemon exclusively on the overworld. Seems like you would have to do both.
Don't mislead people. This is the core game they were talking about last year. Maybe it's difficult to accept it, but it is what it is.
Thank you, thank you, terrific audience
It's a trojan horse my first pokemon to bait go players and lapsed fans into a switch and the main game next year
Not to this degree, they gutted the underside of the game to truly simplify it to prevent new or super old lapsed fans from being overwhelmedEvery Pokemon game is tailor-made to pull in new and lapsed fans.
They've been working on Gen 8 since Sun/Moon released.Don't mislead people. This is the core game they were talking about last year. Maybe it's difficult to accept it, but it is what it is.
Right, it's a bridge title from Pokemon GO to the core RPG series. Maybe those fans will go on to play Gen 8 next year too.
Motion controls are not mandatory, and you may use buttons if you choose to. It says as much on the official website under "Catching Made Easy".Can someone confirm if the motion controls for catching a pokémon are mandatory? If so it could be my deal breaker
I don't think it really matters what game they were talking about last year, there's a core RPG launching in 2019 which hits the initial 2018/2019 release window.Don't mislead people. This is the core game they were talking about last year. Maybe it's difficult to accept it, but it is what it is.
Not at all, not in Pokémon's case anyway. I love the surprise aspect, never knowing what I'll find, and not only not knowing what specific Pokémon I'm about to (or not about to) find, but also never knowing if it's Shiny or not on top of that.
We still have battles, just not not in the wild. Something is sure to change in order to compensate the lack of battling with wild Pokémon. And just because catching is now different from battling, doesn't mean that catching won't have fun or some degree of strategy.My standard is actually liking the premise of the series, battling and catching. When you have people celebrating the lack of wild battles, where both were intertwined, it makes me wonder about things.
The don't need todo innovate, they need to create a game that doesn't look like a PS1 game emulated in HD.
It's embarrasing, i don't understand why the technical bar of the franchise is so damn low, and just to clarify, i don't expect an open world or a reboot, just look at Monster Hunter World compared to Generations, that's the kind of leap i want and the core games need.
The super casual base doesn't care about the games beyond thisBut the point is... can they? I don't see many people attracted by this premise sticking around for long (not even for another "Let's Go XXXXXX" title) after A-mashing and steamrolling through the story mode in this game in 10 hours and flicking their wrist to capture the 300th Zubat before realising there's no meat at all on it.