• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.

VectorPrime

Banned
Apr 4, 2018
11,781
What a farce. Un got nearly everything he could have wanted and Trump got a photo op with nothing in return (no wait, Trump condos on NK beaches!) while pissing off our allies in the process. "Commit to work towards denuclearization." That's it. Give me a fucking break. Same song and dance NK has played for decades now, only this time they finally found a useful idiot who wants so bad to be liked that he'll do anything to get that feeling, even if it's shit. The Art of the Deal. Brilliant.

Hey Trump supporters, how's it feel to constantly support a President who sells out your country for nothing? Why do you still willfully keep the blinders on? To 'own the libs'? Well, congrats. You've all played yourselves and you're still happy to wallow in that fact for god knows what purpose at this point. Pathetic.

Exactly fucking right. But I don't care about the Trump supporters praising him since that's gonna happen no matter what. What pisses me off are the liberals and centrists who should know better buying directly into Trump's narrative and praising him when he did LESS THAN NOTHING.

Oh my god an "open dialogue" or "first step" mean jack shit.
 

BocoDragon

Banned
Oct 26, 2017
5,207
At the beginning and end of the day, Trump was the wrong person for this.

It's rather fascinating.... a month ago South Korean President Moon and Kim Jong Un shook hands, with very little signed on the table as well, and the reaction from the South Korean people and the SK left was overwhelmingly joy and tears.

Here we are with Trump and it's almost the same thing and... it's been poisoned and somehow doesn't look similar at all. Trump poisoned it with his half-brained praise of Kim that goes far beyond what the circumstance called for (which was mere respectful dialogue... not condoning of their entire regime). And he bent over backwards to accommodate them without getting anything on paper. South Korea didn't promise much of them anything last month. I bet Kim is surprised that he got so much from Trump for so little.

Not only that, but the left, who should be open to diplomacy as a superior tool than being a war hawk... they're looking at Trump shaking hands with a dictator and it just doesn't have the optics of good diplomacy and de-escalation of tension. It looks the same as his buddy buddy with Putin and Duterte... and the week after he gave the finger to the G7 allies??

Only Nixon could go to China.

But only Trump could fuck up a good chance of productive dialogue with North Korea.
 

Phrozenflame500

The Fallen
Oct 28, 2017
2,132
Wow this is really playing right into China's hands. Opening up the possibility to remove all US military forces from South Korea?

Don the master negotiator strikes agian.
 

AndyD

Mambo Number PS5
Member
Oct 27, 2017
8,602
Nashville
The funny thing is looking at Trump's comments and behavior, I actually think he is going to ghost NK after this and never meet him again. Anybody else get that sense?

That's exactly what's going to happen. There will be "negotiations" behind the scenes, but he will say "my people are working on it" forever from now on.
 

antonz

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
5,309
Trump knows he is getting nothing. I mean all you had to listen to was his completely uneducated talk on what Denuclearization is. "Oh it can take as long as 15 years" "Once you pass 20% you can never get nukes again" The man already gave the timeline that allows him to be long dead and no progress while also stating he has no fucking clue what denuclearization is.
 

TokyoJoe

Member
Oct 28, 2017
1,044
User Warned: Trolling
It's been a wonderful day though. Best Korea has been positive in the news and it makes me very happy.
 

Jazar

Member
Oct 25, 2017
1,490
South Florida
Ezra always laying things out for the common folk:



"For a long time, US-NK relations were caught in a vise: 1. US wanted what NK wouldn't give: verifiable denuclearization 2. NK wanted what US wouldn't give: 1:1 talks, be treated as a legit power, keep nuclear weapons We were stuck. And then Donald Trump came along."

Entire thread worth reading. Unrolled here: https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1006574817259094017.html

Basically Trump is great at lowering the bar so much that we see things as a win if we're not at the brink of nuclear war.
 

Guy.brush

Member
Oct 27, 2017
1,358
What are the chances, Trump sees the numbers/ratings this stunt brought him and starts asking his staff how to be a repeat offender?
Think more meetings with Kim, going golfing with him, touring the beach property, him and Kim going on rallies etc.?
 

rambis

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
2,790
Ezra always laying things out for the common folk:



"For a long time, US-NK relations were caught in a vise: 1. US wanted what NK wouldn't give: verifiable denuclearization 2. NK wanted what US wouldn't give: 1:1 talks, be treated as a legit power, keep nuclear weapons We were stuck. And then Donald Trump came along."

Entire thread worth reading. Unrolled here: https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1006574817259094017.html

Basically Trump is great at lowering the bar so much that we see things as a win if we're not at the brink of nuclear war.

This needs to be in the OP of every single NK thread. Its insane that it has to be explained so much when it has all unfolded in front of our very eyes the past 2 years.
 

Skelepuzzle

Member
Apr 17, 2018
6,119

Ravensmash

Member
Oct 25, 2017
8,797
Fuck literally every single person trying to paint this as some kind of victory for Trump and the US


Fuck

Every

One

Of

You

Shills



The man is ON THE FUCKING RECORD FOR KILLING THOUSANDS and yet Trump is fucking shilling for the shit bag in front of the press. Are you fucking kidding me right now? Someone go through the thread and quote the people trying to showcase this as a win. I want their excuse for this garbage.

See I'm conflicted - but the way I look at it (possibly naively) is like this:

Is the relationship between USA and NK far better now than it was 6 months back?

Hard to say that it's worse.

People were freaking out about nukes being fired at Guam not long ago - or the prospect of the US doing something unpredictable.

It's not ideal and there is hypocrisy involved (Iran, Trump's handling of the G7 and how he's far colder with staunch allies) but hey.

I'd rather that than the US and NK threatening each other with nukes.

Let's see how it is in 6 months and hope that this time it sticks.
 
Oct 27, 2017
7,885
See I'm conflicted - but the way I look at it (possibly naively) is like this:

Is the relationship between USA and NK far better now than it was 6 months back?

Hard to say that it's worse.

People were freaking out about nukes being fired at Guam not long ago - or the prospect of the US doing something unpredictable.

It's not ideal and there is hypocrisy involved (Iran, Trump's handling of the G7 and how he's far colder with staunch allies) but hey.

I'd rather that than the US and NK threatening each other with nukes.

Let's see how it is in 6 months and hope that this time it sticks.

The question is when this falls apart, like the other dozen times, do you come back to lament giving Un his propaganda coup?

My guess, is no
 

Ravensmash

Member
Oct 25, 2017
8,797
The question is when this falls apart, like the other dozen times, do you come back to lament giving Un his propaganda coup?

My guess, is no

This really isn't on the same scale as those other dozen times though. I'd never thought we'd be in a situation where the US and NK leader would be meeting in person.

If it backfires, then yes, global leaders should be far more cautious and

Like I said. We'll see.

I'm optimistic because I want it to work. Happy to call it out as shit if it comes to it further down the line though.
 

BocoDragon

Banned
Oct 26, 2017
5,207
I wonder how the South Koreans are going to respond to this.

They were very hopeful about this meeting. They wanted this to happen. They were very proud when their President Moon met with Kim last month.

The reality of Trump doing this looks very different....
 
Oct 27, 2017
7,885
This really isn't on the same scale as those other dozen times though. I'd never thought we'd be in a situation where the US and NK leader would be meeting in person.

It didn't happen before because no POTUS was dumb enough to give the Norks what they want, for free.

Aside from that singular, dumb-ass difference, how is this time different from the other dozen times?
 

dmann

Member
Oct 27, 2017
285
Not a fan of Trump; but if this prevents any escalation of potential nuclear war... then I would consider it a win. The agreement they signed means nothing until its an actual peace treaty signed by all parties (South, North, US) with proper terms laid out.
 

BocoDragon

Banned
Oct 26, 2017
5,207
It didn't happen before because no POTUS was dumb enough to give the Norks what they want, for free.

Aside from that singular, dumb-ass difference, how is this time different from the other dozen times?
Not really. NK has never offered to speak 1 on 1 with South Korean and American President before.

Obama would have accepted this talk. He wouldn't necessarily have given such a glowing photo op with no concrete deal in place.
 

Ravensmash

Member
Oct 25, 2017
8,797
It didn't happen before because no POTUS was dumb enough to give the Norks what they want, for free.

Aside from that singular, dumb-ass difference, how is this time different from the other dozen times?

That singular dumb ass difference is a projection of your own beliefs.

What do you think the ideal solution to the NK situation would be?

Isolation has worked well hasn't it?

If giving Kim a platform eventually opens up NK then so what?
 

rambis

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
2,790
Not really. NK has never offered to speak 1 on 1 with South Korean and American President before.

Obama would have accepted this talk. He wouldn't necessarily have given such a glowing photo op with no concrete deal in place.
If you don't know what you are saying, why say it? Jesus fucking christ.

Fun Fact: NK was so desperate to talk to a US president in the Obama years that they invited Bill Clinton to neogotiate a prisoner release...


Yes...who to believe....



These are considered exercises. Basically troops playing around in chem gear, hiding in bunkers etc.

What will likely pause is the air exercises.
 
Oct 30, 2017
4,190
If giving Kim a platform eventually opens up NK then so what?

Still trying to understand the path of progression here. Plenty of oppressive government have friendly relationships with the US and have for years and years. Where has ever been shown that better relations = better conditions for the people living in that nation. Especially now, when the administration is more than happy to let people like Putin and Duerte do as they please?
 

BocoDragon

Banned
Oct 26, 2017
5,207
This is categorically false.

Show me then. I am not aware of any time that NK has offered to speak directly to both leaders.

Trump's first US Presidential meeting with an NK leader is following the first meeting between the SK president and the NK president. That is why today is different, and it's not all about Trump being a wild card.

NK has been making offers to meet with US presidents since Clinton. Got anything else?


I specifically said South Korean President and American president.

Trump was invited by South Korean President Moon to talk after his first ever meeting with Kim.

This isn't Trump's original action... he is responding to SK's original action. When the two Koreas have brokered their own diplomacy, it's an altogether different thing to say yes to.
 

BWoog

Member
Oct 27, 2017
38,376
Still trying to understand the path of progression here. Plenty of oppressive government have friendly relationships with the US and have for years and years. Where has ever been shown that better relations = better conditions for the people living in that nation. Especially now, when the administration is more than happy to let people like Putin and Duerte do as they please?

Putin and Duerte have done some horrible shit, but they're nowhere near Kim. Read about some of the North Korean internment camps and get back to me.
 

rambis

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
2,790
Show me then. I am not aware of any time that NK has offered to speak directly to both leaders.

Trump's first US Presidential meeting with an NK leader is following the first meeting between the SK president and the NK president. That is why today is different, and it's not all about Trump being a wild card.
And you double down lmao

https://www.history.com/news/north-korea-nuclear-deal-bill-clinton-agreed-framework

Do you have any earthly idea of what you're talking about?
 
Oct 30, 2017
4,190
Show me then. I am not aware of any time that NK has offered to speak directly to both leaders.

Trump's first US Presidential meeting with an NK leader is following the first meeting between the SK president and the NK president. That is why today is different, and it's not all about Trump being a wild card.

This is a shocking level of historical ignorance. SK and NK have met before. You're in here lecturing us on the virtues of diplomacy and you don't even know the basics of the situation over there?

20000626_400.jpg