Sounds like there might have been rumors about all of this going around Nerdist
Wow, good on Donna Dickens for not taking any bullshit. I wish more people in workspaces would prioritize the rights and safety of other human beings over their own career anxieties. This is a very good thing and the right thing to do.
Lotta folx in this thread don't seem to understand how an abusive relationship works despite the fact that Ms Dykstra has illustrated the inner workings of one perfectly and given strong counters to the traditional "why didn't you leave, you foolish girl?" Nonsense that inevitably arises.
When you are in an abusive relationship you have been
hijacked. Your body and your mind don't feel like your own and you come to think of everything in terms of how it will please or displease your abuser. This mental process requires
everything of you. You do not have the emotional capability to think of your own health and happiness because they have convinced you that both of those things are synonymous with their desires, not yours. Hence sexual coercion or "starfishing" (vomits in mouth).
Abuse is not about sex or fantasy fulfillment it is about control, and most importantly it can happen to anyone. There is not a type of foolish girl who falls into obvious traps because she's dumb. There are just people. We are hearing more and more about the entertainment industry's abusers because it is a highly visible industry with intense power structures that provide plenty of cover for abusers. But have no doubt, these abusers exist at equal rates in
every profession. There are hierarchies that give way to coercion in the finance industry, the legal profession, medicine, academia, public services, the non-profit world, the art world, the fashion industry, and
definitely the service industry. No one on this thread should be singling out Chloe Dykstra for falling into some obvious trap that no rational person would fall into. You have no idea who in your life is currently or has been trapped in a coercive, unhealthy, and abusive relationship. It could be your neighbor, your closest friend, your sister, your brother, or your parents. I have seen it.
Only one last thing I'll say: some people here express surprise because Chloe always seemed so cheerful in public. This is a very common coping mechanism, and while I don't mean that we should all scrutinize the excessively cheerful, you should all know that rape and abuse survivors are not all perpetually lachrymose.
I was dating a woman in college when she was assaulted at a frat party and in the aftermath she was almost worryingly energetic and positive. I guess i would describe her now as manic. Almost the exact opposite of what you would expect happened: I became horribly depressed and she relentlessly threw herself into extracuriculars and positive attitudes. I remember after we stopped dating I could barely get out of bed for class and she got a job giving tours on campus and working with our university's outreach to recruit more students. Her brother was a close friend of mine and years later after we both graduated I asked him, "Hey, why is it that ______ worked so hard to bring students to our university when the administration never supported her after her assault and basically the only thing going there ever gave her was misery?" He told me "oh, she hated that fucking place, but she didn't know what else to do." She was in an abusive relationship
with an institution. Despite being at times dangerously close to suicide in part because of a lack of institutional support, she was still selling the school. When you're in an abusive relationship, self-termination sometimes seems more viable and reasonable than leaving.
Tldr; fuck Chris Hardwick. Whether you ever liked his output or not (not HIM, the person is not the same thing as what they make), it shouldn't make it difficult for you to believe women.