Did you make this? Cause I know what I'm going to start plastering everywhere.
If a bakery can legally not make a cake for a gay couple then it can go both waysSo we support a restaurant owners right to deny service to someone based on their beliefs?
I can't agree with this.
Sarah Sanders is a liar and has a belief system I am staunchly opposed to, but public institutions should have no right to discriminate.
Let us show them how much better we are than them by being nice and polite to them while they march us over the cliff into the sea.
That'll prove we were the good guys after all.
I mean we'll all be dead, but think of how much work it will be for them to bury us on these high horses.
Revenge!
This.Gotta love her name dropping the name and location of the business to try and sic the horde on them.
SMH
If I owned a restaurant I would refuse service to OJ Simpson. I would refuse service to Bill Cosby. I would refuse service to David Duke. I would refuse service to Milo. I would refuse service to Richard Spencer. That does not put me on the level of a murderer, or a rapist, or a bigot, or a nazi. Not taking a stand and serving them anyway doesn't magically make them less of a murderer, or rapist, or bigot, or nazi.
It's mind boggling that some of you don't realize how stupid the shit you are saying is.
Did you make this? Cause I know what I'm going to start plastering everywhere.
Are people just naive, or do they really not understand this already happens to the vast majority of minorities, LGBTQ community for awhile now?So honest question to all of those saying we should be taking the 'high road' how has that been working out so far? In my view these shit-stains are taking that high road kindness for weakness and fucking us all even harder. Why the hell should we continue to let them?
Yep.
Are people just naive, or do they really not understand this already happens to the vast majority of minorities, LGBTQ community for awhile now?
Those that keep implying "this is irony" or "this is setting a dangerous precedent" or "take the high road", where have you actually been in the past...decades...centuries?
I have a hard time understanding people sometimes, especially those that like to play faux social justice, and then when it comes to an issue like this, they just don't get it.
So we support a restaurant owners right to deny service to someone based on their beliefs?
I can't agree with this.
Sarah Sanders is a liar and has a belief system I am staunchly opposed to, but public institutions should have no right to discriminate.
It's actually VERY easy to understand. "I've been told I'm not allowed to say this, so I'm going to make sure NO ONE can say this!" It's a very self centered and childish world view. All the while, they are still wanting to do the former and and are just looking for any sort of justification that they can.I have a hard time understanding people sometimes, especially those that like to play faux social justice, and then when it comes to an issue like this, they just don't get it.
We are done with the 'high road'. These people cannot be reasoned with.
Yeah if that's how they wanna do things, we can play this game too.A restaurant isn't a public institution. If bakers get to refuse service to gay people, I don't see why a restaurant can't refuse to serve a bigot.
This isn't about beliefs anymore folks. These people are actively harming a bunch of destitute men,women, and children while peddling lies about what they do in this country. Good on the owner for refusing service.
It's actually VERY easy to understand. "I've been told I'm not allowed to say this, so I'm going to make sure NO ONE can say this!" It's a very self centered and childish world view. All the while, they are still wanting to do the former and and are just looking for any sort of justification that they can.
So in this SHS example, the next step is "Well if they are allowed to stop her from eating there for that, I should be able to keep gay people from eating at my restaurant! What? It's not the same? Supporting gays is a political stance too! So I totally can!"
Anything to justify what they REALLY want.
No they don't.They really need to make political affiliation a protected status for discrimination, imo.
They really need to make political affiliation a protected status for discrimination, imo.
Pontificating about being better than them is laughable when it consistently yields little to nothing and the other side keeps seeing you as a muppet to be easily walked all over. Timidly sticking to decorum achieves nothing. It will never make the other side suddenly act in good faith or treat you with any more respect. Sarah Huckabee Sanders is willingly and knowingly continuing to dedicate her efforts for an administration committing multiple tangible acts of evil and I'm supposed to take seriously the notion that liberals should also pause for a moment and consider not being very mean to her (even though refusing her service isn't even being that mean - boo hoo to their victim narrative).
If you ever want to achieve equitable pushback against current acts of evil, be fucking ruthless with your messaging and your campaign. None of this stupid "when they go low, we go high". If a prospective undecided voter decides it's worth giving Trump or his cavalcade of evil, slobbering baboons their vote, influenced considerably by what they perceive to be liberals doing or saying some mildly mean things (as opposed to say, kidnapping young children from their families and shoving them into camps (for concentration)?), guess what? This person was always going to be a gormless Trump voter!
They really need to make political affiliation a protected status for discrimination, imo.
This ho-hum, tone policing, kid gloves approach is exactly the kind of slow-boil that led to the Trump administration and the mess we're in today. Here's a hint: one side is on the right side of history and the other is not. The quicker we smother the other side (which includes the right of a private business to deny service to abhorrent human beings complicit in humanitarian crimes) the quicker we can stop this corruption from worsening and begin the decades-long healing process. Our "hogher road" approach isn't working and only gives them more opportunity to throw sand in our eyes. If they don't fight fair, why should we be the polite ones?I'm not Staning for shit bags. You're not following the logic.
I'm Staning for standards and how we treat one another.
I don't like the Trump administration. But I refuse to be afraid to call out the people I align with when I think they're being unfair, unreasonable, or hypocritical.
And this is a forum that is a tough place to
do that, but I don't like the bully mentality from any side.
They really need to make political affiliation a protected status for discrimination, imo.