• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.

Autodidact

Member
Oct 25, 2017
18,729
So a bunch of bitch ass coward right wingers came in here and played the victim?

I, for one, am shocked they would do such a thing.
To be fair, their friends and relatives probably let them get away with the "both sides" shit and holding bigoted views either because (1) they only hang around people like them because hate and ignorance tend to cluster or (2) "it's just politics I don't want to lose a friend." You can actually see a bit of the latter on this forum, with well-meaning liberal people being unwilling to condemn or challenge the hateful people in their lives.
 

Shoeless

Member
Oct 27, 2017
7,000
BOTH SIDES.

Seriously, though. What exactly are the "dems" doing to ruin people's lives in very real ways? Don't both sides this shit when one party is actively trying to dismantle people's livelihoods and the other is mostly fighting to prevent that from happening.

In a weird sort of way, a lot of this is starting to remind me of how shocked a bully can be, when the kid in glasses they've been terrorizing actually punches back, instead of just crying, and they're genuinely horrified and say stuff like, "But... you're not supposed to DO that! I'm supposed to be tough, and you're supposed to be weak, that's the way it works! WHYYYY?!?"
 

saenima

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
11,892
So let's see if we (me and the people who quoted me) can come to some sort of a consensus here. In principle, discrimination for any reason is wrong. In reality, because of the current political situation in the US and the actions of Trump's government, fighting against that government, racism and the alt-right and preserving the normal way of life means that certain principles have to be temporarily suspended so that more important values can be protected. Yes? No?

She's not being discriminated against. She's being denied dervice because she's a lying bigot who kidnaps children.
 

foggy

Member
Oct 25, 2017
12,972
I think the responses in this thread itself should show you that both parties are polarized. I have been dogpiled just because I said I am Republican and because I think the country is too polarized.

I have been equated to a racist, told my thoughts are fucking gross, told to go cry more and so on.

The responses are so great and in such numbers I cannot possibly even respond to them all.

But, my point is that I think both sides are polarized, and I cannot remember a time it has been more polarized. I wish it would be less so. There is no longer discussion on anything anymore, I feel.

Just my thoughts though on it.

LMAO of all the FUCKED up things going on you gonna lament this shit?

Take a wild guess why you're being met with disdain
 

NinjaScooter

Member
Oct 25, 2017
54,186
In a weird sort of way, a lot of this is starting to remind me of how shocked a bully can be, when the kid in glasses they've been terrorizing actually punches back, instead of just crying, and they're genuinely horrified and say stuff like, "But... you're not supposed to DO that! I'm supposed to be tough, and you're supposed to be weak, that's the way it works! WHYYYY?!?"

And of course you are going to have people that spin a person standing up to a bully as being "immoral" and "despicable", because, you know, they're just asking questions, or listening to Ghandi.
 

legacyzero

Banned
Oct 26, 2017
4,252
So let's see if we (me and the people who quoted me) can come to some sort of a consensus here. In principle, discrimination for any reason is wrong. In reality, because of the current political situation in the US and the actions of Trump's government, fighting against that government, racism and the alt-right and preserving the normal way of life means that certain principles have to be temporarily suspended so that more important values can be protected. Yes? No?
What you're forgetting in your little experiment here is the control. What exactly is being discriminated against? If your answer is "Conservative!" That's disingenuous as hell. If you're gonna insist in showing your Conservative underpants here, at least bring more than false equivalence to the table. You might be taken a little more serious
 

Chekhonte

User banned for use of an alt-account
Banned
Oct 31, 2017
1,886
Right, this is just about some quibbling disagreement. The restaurant owners behavior was untoward and ungentlemanly. I guess she'll just have to go back and eat some separated immigrant babies feet first head raised with the knowledge that she's the better man.
 

Alexandros

Member
Oct 26, 2017
17,815
What you're forgetting in your little experiment here is the control. What exactly is being discriminated against? If your answer is "Conservative!" That's disingenuous as hell. If you're gonna insist in showing your Conservative underpants here, at least bring more than false equivalence to the table. You might be taken a little more serious

Guys please read the rest of my posts before replying to my earlier ones.
 

perfectchaos007

It's Happening
Member
Oct 25, 2017
12,249
Texas
Restaurants and businesses can deny service for any reason so....
like others have said, your job is not a protected class so they aren't denying because of race/gender/orientation therefor they have the right to kick her out
 

McMahon

Banned
May 24, 2018
1,603
Los Angeles
LMAO of all the FUCKED up things going on you gonna lament this shit?

Take a wild guess why you're being met with disdain
You expect self-reflection from someone so morally corrupt and out of touch? Never!

Coward's already slinked off to some other corner of the forum. Waiting to pop pop in another thread and spew bile again sometime in the future.
 

Ogami Itto

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
3,612
Some people here need to listen the crying immigrant children audio nonstop for a whole day, and then tell me how you feel about the piece of shit defending it on tv. She should be starved to death.
 
Oct 27, 2017
10,660
I can't stand to be near people that advocate for children to be kidnapped from their parents and then locked in cages inside concentration camps. Sorry not sorry. There is no both sides. This is not a political debate, it's a stand against fascism. If you want service, be a decent human being. You don't get to claim that other humans are vermin and dog whistle white supremacy and then get butthurt when people recognize you are a shitheel garbage person.
 

Orayn

Member
Oct 25, 2017
10,983
I'm going to break with the crowd and say that discriminating against fascists should be legal, encouraged, and universally practiced. No wishy washy lib equivocation, just let bad people know they aren't welcome anywhere.
 

Alexandros

Member
Oct 26, 2017
17,815
I just want to say kudos for sticking around and at least trying to understand where everybody was coming from despite the many, many replies. Most people cry victim and then evacuate. It really seems like you're being genuine.

Thank you. I know that these discussions get pretty heated so I make an effort to respond in a calm manner. I understand that some people are posting in bad faith but I like to think I'm not one of them.
 

GaimeGuy

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
5,092
Alexandros, I know you're being flooded with posts, but it is not wrong to treat someone differently because of the cruel way that they have acted towards others. That's not discrimination based on someone's nature, that's treating people fairly according to their deeds and character towards others.
 

Username1198

The Fallen
Oct 27, 2017
8,125
Space, Man
6bSUVFT.gif

11/10

Era platinum for you.
 

foggy

Member
Oct 25, 2017
12,972
Front-facing spokesperson for fascist propaganda is just a person with different beliefs trying to feed their family in peace.

The absolute poverty of a centrist position.
 

NoRéN

Banned
Oct 26, 2017
2,623
Some of these trump fans I swear.

* as they usher Jews into the incinerator*
"Guys, I'm being perfectly pleasant to you and polite. Please treat me with respect. Let's all behave, ok."
 

Link

Banned
Oct 26, 2017
3,623
In a weird sort of way, a lot of this is starting to remind me of how shocked a bully can be, when the kid in glasses they've been terrorizing actually punches back, instead of just crying, and they're genuinely horrified and say stuff like, "But... you're not supposed to DO that! I'm supposed to be tough, and you're supposed to be weak, that's the way it works! WHYYYY?!?"
Reminds me of this:

894235c3e829c9a075b21525b1e13281--strips-sort.jpg


We need more people this this guy.
 
Oct 27, 2017
10,660
It should be adamantly illegal for public servants to use social media to attack private businesses or individuals. The responsibility that they have with such a pulpit should make it that doing such a thing is a felony. Using that standing to attack individuals is essentially the government attacking them. I think she should be charged with something. We can't have our leaders and their assistants using official communication channels in this manner.
 

BDS

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
13,845
If I lived near Lexington I'd gladly go eat at this place. Make fascists scared and embarrassed to be in public.
 

Karateka

Member
Oct 28, 2017
6,940
Ehhh do not really agree with this.
I don't see why any restaurant or business should have the right to remove any customer who has not done something unsavoury within that business.
We should not get to the point when restaurants pick and choose who can eat there
 

Orayn

Member
Oct 25, 2017
10,983
Ehhh do not really agree with this.
I don't see why any restaurant or business should have the right to remove any customer who has not done something unsavoury within that business.
We should not get to the point when restaurants pick and choose who can eat there
I'm the guy posting a thought experiment about the moral complexities of Hitler walking into a fast food joint.
 

Alexandros

Member
Oct 26, 2017
17,815
Don't die on this dumb hill. It's so god damn disingenuous. "Be the better person to people who hate you and serve them food"
I bet you're a boogie lover

The only thing I can tell you is that I try to be the better person in my real life and sometimes it's really fucking hard. I've talked with a few other posters and I feel like I have a better understanding of the whole situation, at least enough to understand some important nuances.
 

NinjaScooter

Member
Oct 25, 2017
54,186
Ehhh do not really agree with this.
I don't see why any restaurant or business should have the right to remove any customer who has not done something unsavoury within that business.
We should not get to the point when restaurants pick and choose who can eat there

Are they creating you guys in a factory?
 
Oct 27, 2017
10,660
Ehhh do not really agree with this.
I don't see why any restaurant or business should have the right to remove any customer who has not done something unsavoury within that business.
We should not get to the point when restaurants pick and choose who can eat there
As long as the reason is not race, sexuality, gender, religion, physical ability, or other protected class, any private business should absolutely have the right to refuse service. What if having this lying sack of shit eating there made the employees feel uncomfortable? What if someone's relative was put in a cage by her boss's actions? What if the other patrons were chased off by her presence? Sarah Sanders is not a protected class, she's a lying asshole and lying assholes should be discriminated against.
 

rjinaz

Avenger
Oct 25, 2017
28,414
Phoenix
Ehhh do not really agree with this.
I don't see why any restaurant or business should have the right to remove any customer who has not done something unsavoury within that business.
We should not get to the point when restaurants pick and choose who can eat there
Free country. At least that's what I'm told. If a person is your worst enemy I see no reason you are legally required to serve them unless it's based on a protected class. Why would you want that to be the case?
 

Alucrid

Chicken Photographer
Member
Oct 25, 2017
11,438
Ehhh do not really agree with this.
I don't see why any restaurant or business should have the right to remove any customer who has not done something unsavoury within that business.
We should not get to the point when restaurants pick and choose who can eat there

if i ever open up a restaurant this person is the going to be the first to be banned
 

Karateka

Member
Oct 28, 2017
6,940
As long as the reason is not race, sexuality, gender, religion, physical ability, or other protected class, any private business should absolutely have the right to refuse service. What if having this lying sack of shit eating there made the employees feel uncomfortable? What if someone's relative was put in a cage by her boss's actions? What if the other patrons were chased off by her presence? Sarah Sanders is not a protected class, she's a lying asshole and lying assholes should be discriminated against.

That is doing something unsavoury in that business.
If she went in and was being racist in there, sure kick her out.
If she went in to buy some food and was doing nothing wrong, I don't really understand.

As for "what if someones relative was put in a cage by her bosses actions" I can't think of any other time when that would be relevant?
So many people are lying assholes but most people don't know about it, not sure how we can decide whether or not someone is a lying asshole at the door.
 
Oct 27, 2017
167
She wasn't kicked out for her political beliefs.

She was kicked out for being an active collaborator in human rights violations among all of the other hundred things Trump has done.

Big difference.
 

NinjaScooter

Member
Oct 25, 2017
54,186
That is doing something unsavoury in that business.
If she went in and was being racist in there, sure kick her out.
If she went in to buy some food and was doing nothing wrong, I don't really understand.

As for "what if someones relative was put in a cage by her bosses actions" I can't think of any other time when that would be relevant?
So many people are lying assholes but most people don't know about it, not sure how we can decide whether or not someone is a lying asshole at the door.

The business did not want to be associated with someone who is a very public and vocal liar and bigot. Why should they not have that right? Why are we having this same dumb argument thrown out for like the 6th time in this single thread. Did some of you skip 7th grade civics class?