Please give me just something to hold on even 1% of hope that this country isn't going to be a nightmare for the next 50 years because of Kennedy.
If they do, it's war. Straight up. They will create thousands of terrorists overnight
I mean, I'm being sarcastic in the specific example I chose, but I do believe that retaliation against either themselves or their aides is something they think about.
Well then I hope to see particularly ugly procedural, quorum, whatever fights on the floor of the Senate in that case. I expect it. I demand it. I'm calling my senators' offices to say so.
But Trump's pick will likely pass, and with it, the Social Schism will likely deepen. If LGBTQ rights, abortion rights, voting rights, and the treatment of prisoners are affected more strongly in a new Roberts Court, then the differences between blue and red states will be even more stark. Some states already have legalized abortion before Roe v. Wade, for example; others might need to do it themselves in the worst-case scenario. States could conceivably divide on whether or not a queer couple can get married far more explicitly in the future. (It's hard to flat out reverse a ruling - look how long it took the Supreme Court to disown Komatsu - but far easier to revise and chip it down.)
We will live in far more different countries in the future than we do today without a swing justice. The legal and social landscapes will look alien from one state to another, and the common frame of reference will wilt again. That, to me, is the likelier legacy of the Trump era, whether it lasts four years or eight - we will be wary, and warily apart.
Yea, I think people are misinterpreting what would happen here.No way in hell they do that. Then you give the blue wave even more ammunition.
Just pass a law expanding the court to 11 seats. It's simple.So what do we need to do to pack the court? Gain the presidency, the Senate, and the house and then what?
I'm surprised they haven't alreadyIf they do, it's war. Straight up. They will create thousands of terrorists overnight
I agree with this. And the Supreme Court is fully politicized at this point, so time to start protesting the Justices directly.Regarding hesitancy to packing the court, I think we need to accept that the old norms are dead. If the right is willing to do anything to gain control including colluding with foreign governments, hiring white supremacists, and dicking around with supreme court nominees, then the left has to use everything in their toolbox to combat that.
If the future is to be dictated by rotating periods of left and right control, so be it. It's better than giving up a branch of government to the right and their underhanded tactics.
Pretty much. I don't expect it to happen because Dems are much more in favor of decorum, but it's certainly more realistic than impeaching a Supreme Court judge.
Blue states are going to be little islands of peace in a sea of blightSo, basically move to blue states ASAP if you want any part of what we call America today. The future is fucking bleak and very "christian".
The risk in that is it makes the court 100% partisan rather than the <100% partisan level it is at now or will be.
For once I agree with you~~~
The court is already 100% partisan.The risk in that is it makes the court 100% partisan rather than the <100% partisan level it is at now or will be.
You'll hear some rumblings from the GOP to do it after, but it'll happen before.Hi I'm new here.
So is the confirmation gonna happen before or after the mid terms?
Hi I'm new here.
So is the confirmation gonna happen before or after the mid terms?
Lamb ran promising not to vote for Pelosi.
This is the norm, not the exception.
I'm super nervous about how the press is gonna flip out, and bend over backwards to the Republicans.
I'm surprised they haven't already
Seriously, that we've gone this long without a violent, bloody riot is surprising me. I predicted one within the first year after Trump won.
The risk in that is it makes the court 100% partisan rather than the <100% partisan level it is at now or will be.
It already isThe risk in that is it makes the court 100% partisan rather than the <100% partisan level it is at now or will be.
As a principle, that's nice. As messaging to the nation, that's really dumb because we all know working class Americans don't include any POC.
Yes.Hi I'm new here.
So is the confirmation gonna happen before or after the mid terms?
These justices are nominated by a partisan leader and confirmed by a partisan legislative body. Part of our problem is that we've been acting cute and pretending that judges aren't political actors for 35+ years, and especially since the Religious Right mobilized itself.The risk in that is it makes the court 100% partisan rather than the <100% partisan level it is at now or will be.
Probably after. It's a good tool to mobilize the bigot voters.
I meant like a full scale, honest to god, molotovs flying riot.A women was murdered during a protest. What do you mean we haven't had a violent incident?
People commenting and saying they wish sanders would come back. Or join the Dem party.
To quote myself:I'm surprised they haven't already
Seriously, that we've gone this long without a violent, bloody riot is surprising me. I predicted one within the first year after Trump won.
Because there's a glimmer of hope left for fighting it at the ballot box come November. People are processing 2016 as having fucked up and holding tightly to the chance to start fighting back without hopping the railings of polite society come November.
Should that fail? That's when you see all hell break loose. On both ends of the spectrum. For good and for evil.
I meant like a full scale, honest to god, molotovs flying riot.
No way New York, Washington, Oregon and California ban abortions.How will states be beacons? If a court finds abortion unconstitutional no state will offer it except in alleyways like before. Same with other issues.
I meant like a full scale, honest to god, molotovs flying riot.
A simple statute passed by Congress and signed by the president.What is the actual procedure to increase the court size and send two justices to the bench?
You might get that after the trade war settles in and whenever we slam right into a recession. The majority of Americans still have something to lose.
What is the actual procedure to increase the court size and send two justices to the bench?
Your viewpoint is flies in the face of everything we know about local elections. Yes, they're more nationalized than they used to be, but that doesn't mean that individual candidates and electorates don't matter. People whined and whined about Northam running a milquetoast campaign.... and he overperformed local House races by 2-3%! Tailoring your message to persuadables matters, tailoring your message to your local voters matters.As token "symbolic" votes, I don't really agree that the optics of voting for Pelosi as chief Democratic boogeywooman and confirming a Supreme Court justice who will be a far-right Gorsuch clone are identical. Also I'd argue that the Lamb election was completely a nationalized election (thanks to Pelosi, Trump, et al) and presages a +15 Democratic wave but now I can't even remember what our original disagreement was about to begin with.
I also don't agree with the usual consultant class conclusion that voters are stupid and look to pointless symbolic votes to decide which way they vote, but, again, that's another completely different tangent.
Your viewpoint is flies in the face of everything we know about local elections. Yes, they're more nationalized than they used to be, but that doesn't mean that individual candidates and electorates don't matter. People whined and whined about Northam running a milquetoast campaign.... and he overperformed local House races by 2-3%! Tailoring your message to persuadables matters, tailoring your message to your local voters matters.
And we better hope it matters, because if races nationalize permanently, WE :LOSE ALL THOSE RED SEATS FOREVER.
Oh you actually are insane.At least Dems will have the House in six months
When the Dems win their next trifecta, their top priority should be dissolving the Senate.
Which can also be eliminated by a simple majorityHouse/Senate pass a law, President signs it, President appoints justices and they go through confirmation procedures.
Assuming a Dem trifecta, the only roadblock is the fillibuster.