That's unfortunate to hear. I'll bear that in mind in the future.
Yeah it should be the base standard. But focusing attacks on Bibi is also ignoring that previous PMs rose up the ranks through war crimes
An indication that Democracy on the scale of nation states is failing to enfranchise all those who are effected by a states policies?
An ok action would be to not say anything.That'd be better than defending McCain.
I mean, if it gets him votes and it doesn't actually hurt anything...
I haven't read Anti-Piketty but the critique sounds relatively similar from what I know about him. Bregman has some fairly reasonable ideas and starting positions and he does engage in discourse against the technocracy and their solutions, but at the same time he adopts a lot of later technocratic thought about things like UBI which I'm not fully sold on myself as an amelioration of the issues presented to the working class.
You can attack Trump without defending McCain... But saying that is pointless since they've become chummy with McCain.
I don't know, does it matter that marginalized people become bothered by the normalization and whitewashing of racist anti-civil rights blood-thirsty warhawks?
I mean...ok?
The deep consideration and look into the origins of politics and society is amazing. Communities and nations with less reliance on heavy industrialization to function and flourish would be healthy and protect their integrity. I would prefer to integrate and develop science and tech rather than reject in my neoglobal village.
Defending a dead man will always look good to the public. Especially when the public is usually uninformed and all they know of Mccainis that he was a rival for Obama and a War hero.
Can I play the aliens from independence day?
Saying stuff like that to hype up your campaign is common political speak. Like saying that you're kicking off a revolution. I think it's cringe but w/e.
Bernie's revolution was different because he was telling you what the plan is... Lets start a revolution the Grassroot Beto thing is at best assuming that the movement already is the biggest grassroots movement ever and at worst lying about the size of the movement.
Reaching into the hearts of conservative hicks everywhere. I'm sure I've heard the name Hickenlooper before, but you'd think I'd remember a name like that even if I had to look up who he was upon seeing this wild shit.
You can't that's the point. It bothers me how His campaign is boldly claiming that he has the biggest grassroots movement when he clearly cannot know. But worse still is that It cannot be true, he is already claiming that his movement is already bigger than Bernie's entire 2016 grassroots movement which is not possible.
