Yeah at Natve 4k with everything cranked including pathtracing without DLSS. Which nobody should sensibly be doing.
4090 runs Alan Wake 2 (4k/Ray Tracing) at 32 fps, 22 fps with 4080
- Thread starter NeoRaider
- Start date
- Status
These numbers seem pretty similar to Cyberpunk and exactly what one should expect. This is cutting edge stuff on top of native 4k.
As others have said, the console versions will not be path traced or native 4k.
As others have said, the console versions will not be path traced or native 4k.
without FG the 4090 can run the game maxed out at 60+ FPS. How is that unacceptable? This is PATH TRACING.
Path Tracing makes something like Portal one of the more graphically intensive games out there - this is a full-scale AAA game from a studio known for pushing visuals & productions values. I'm thankful DLSS and other reconstruction techniques are empowering devs to do things we otherwise wouldn't get to enjoy until many years down the road.
A 4080 gets you over 100fps at 4k.4080 might end up being the worst purchase I've ever made
DLSS enabled and those cards are running the game perfectly fine maxed out. The information is right there in the image nvidia provided.
Don't even get me started on all the PC enthusiast Youtube channels I've come across lately that pull the word "optimization" out of their ass without knowing a single thing about how game development works.
Everything below 4k maxed with all features enabled is below acceptable levels of quality?
If I owned a AMD card, I'd just throw that shit in the trash. Cuz goddamn if a 4090 is struggling….
It's fine.
Source: https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/geforce/news/alan-wake-2-dlss-3-5-full-ray-tracing-out-this-week/
That said, yep AMD RT and features are 2 gens behind of nvidia sadly.
Yeah, without upscaling.
What's the story here, exactly? This doesn't look to be a case of poor optimization or anything. Upscaling is part of the suite of graphical features we have now that will continue to be used be it through hardware or in engine stuff. Ignoring it and pointing out performance without it is kind of a silly thing to do now. Console games do it, PC games do it. It's been a feature since the 20 series Nvidia cards on PC which released 5 years ago. Things change, five years in tech was a long time ago.
What's the story here, exactly? This doesn't look to be a case of poor optimization or anything. Upscaling is part of the suite of graphical features we have now that will continue to be used be it through hardware or in engine stuff. Ignoring it and pointing out performance without it is kind of a silly thing to do now. Console games do it, PC games do it. It's been a feature since the 20 series Nvidia cards on PC which released 5 years ago. Things change, five years in tech was a long time ago.
Ray Reconstruction is undeniably going to be something you want to use with path tracing, and you can't even enable it without DLSS. Of course folks on 40xx GPUs are going to use DLSS.
you seem to be implying that the bare minimum of acceptable is the absolute maximum a game can run at. surely you don't mean that.
People still don't grasp how absurdly heavy native 4K is.
Nevermind adding Path Tracing on top of that.
I'm surprised the 4090 isn't catching on fire.
Nevermind adding Path Tracing on top of that.
I'm surprised the 4090 isn't catching on fire.
To be fair, nobody is getting an AMD card to play games with ray tracing on.
Frame Generation is only effective at native 60 fps for me. Hopefully Native 4K + DLSSQ can give that otherwise the input lag FG introduces becomes unbearable.
If your definition of "acceptable levels of quality" is non-DLSS'd 4K native fully path traced graphics at 60fps, there is literally no game on earth that has ever had "acceptable levels of quality". Turn some settings down. It used to be universally understood that a game running at max settings should target tomorrow's high end cards, not today's.
the real response should be holy shit over 100fps with ultra settings + full ray tracing at 4k with DLSS. Magical shit.
If they removed DLSS, would you still have this same conclusion?
It's a 4k path traced game. No kidding it isn't running at a super high frame rate. Path traced Cyberpunk 2077 has similar performance on a 4090 with it's path traced mode without DLSS.
Playing Cyberpunk at native 4k with path tracing on is about as bad, but with DLSS and frame generation it's a silky smooth experience. It's arguably even superior to native 4k since that doesn't have the benefits of ray reconstruction
A AAA game using full path tracing running at native 4K running at 30 fps in real time?
That's fucking impressive.
That's fucking impressive.
Yeah, real. That has me feeling way more confident with my current rig more than anything.
cant believe people here trying to defend a 2000$ card having 30fps.
like sure, you can crank up graphics in any game to make the card drop to 30 fps... but whats the point of it?
pretty sure performance without RT wont be that much better. especially on 3000 series cards
like sure, you can crank up graphics in any game to make the card drop to 30 fps... but whats the point of it?
pretty sure performance without RT wont be that much better. especially on 3000 series cards
- Status