I think there's a 480p option for PS1, which forces games into 480p, basically doubling the resolution, but I think that's about it. You're not going to be rendering games at 720p, 1080p or above.
Ah, that's fine, thanks
I think there's a 480p option for PS1, which forces games into 480p, basically doubling the resolution, but I think that's about it. You're not going to be rendering games at 720p, 1080p or above.
I could very easily see someone making a handheld that uses the same or a similar screen to the Analogue Pocket, the screen itself is not prohibitively expensive, even if a more typical screen would result in a more mass market priced product.Just occurred to me that whoever makes the handheld is probably going to stuff it up by requiring vsync_adjust=0 for it to function (i.e. inflexible refresh rates.) You really need vsync_adjust=2 for that low-lag experience that makes FPGA so compelling, but that means a display that can supporting a range of refreshes.
Just occurred to me that whoever makes the handheld is probably going to stuff it up by requiring vsync_adjust=0 for it to function (i.e. inflexible refresh rates.) You really need vsync_adjust=2 for that low-lag experience that makes FPGA so compelling, but that means a display that can supporting a range of refreshes.
Looks like the majority of the cost savings are coming from removing a lot of the redundant power chips?
I think there's a 480p option for PS1, which forces games into 480p, basically doubling the resolution, but I think that's about it.
Can a MiSTer do things like run PS1 games in a higher res, or it is just an "as close to perfect PS1 experience" vs software emulation?
MiSTer entry barrier is too steep, both in price and complexity,
The price even with the increase since Covid is still an absolute steal for what you get, just a CPS2 darksoft kit is costing way more than even the pricy setups. As for complexity, it's the most simple and easy to maintain emulation solution I have ever used, it's so easy.
I think they might have been referring to the complexity of physically assembling the components. Unless you manage to buy a prebuilt kit you have to buy the FPGA on its own then put together the memory, IO board, casing, etc.
Assembling the components is also stupidly easy, I've done harder Lego sets with my little nephew lol.
Are you running the stock power supply or have you tried swapping out your current one? Just checking.
If you want, you can DM me and I'll build you what you need for shipping costs. Not saying this because I don't think you have a point, but because I want to offer help.There are plenty of people who see something that needs assembling and go "Ahh, I'm sure I could do this but I don't want the risk or hassle. Is there a pre-built I can just buy?". There are also people (like me!) who have physical disabilities that make assembly more difficult and something to be avoided if at all possible.
Tbh if the screen can handle odd refresh rates (not even vrr necessarily) you can use 1 instead just fine for input latency and studdering in the odd core (like, say, R-Type) that runs at 57hz. My 4k in the game room does it just fine but doesn't support vrr.Just occurred to me that whoever makes the handheld is probably going to stuff it up by requiring vsync_adjust=0 for it to function (i.e. inflexible refresh rates.) You really need vsync_adjust=2 for that low-lag experience that makes FPGA so compelling, but that means a display that can supporting a range of refreshes.
This is exactly it. Terasic - the DE-10 Nano manufacturer - have exploited their surprise new market.They priced gouged the DE-10 once they saw the demand, there no reason it shouldn't still be at the original price which is roughly the same as this.
If you want, you can DM me and I'll build you what you need for shipping costs. Not saying this because I don't think you have a point, but because I want to offer help.
Really? How's it being disappointing for you?I'm not really interested as I have a couple already but the handheld idea piques my interest. Pocket has been pretty disappointing.
What are you referring to as a "clone"? Are you saying this board clones MiSTer, or that MiSTer clones other devices?Sounds great, but I don't understand the legality on this. You can just clone someone else's electronics? (seriously, I don't know how that works, so that's not sarcasm or anything)
As a "portable MiSTer" it is particularly lacking, in the core support department, but also especially the QoL/UX/UI experience. It is very much a device designed for playing GB cartridges, and everything else is given the bare minimum amount of support or thinking about usability.
As a portable MiSTer it is indeed disappointing. I've enjoyed it quite a bit for what it is, though. It's a treasure for GB/GBC/GBA. Not saying I wouldn't be down for a real portable MiSTer, though. Day 1, actually.As a "portable MiSTer" it is particularly lacking, in the core support department, but also especially the QoL/UX/UI experience. It is very much a device designed for playing GB cartridges, and everything else is given the bare minimum amount of support or thinking about usability.
In the years since the MiSTer came out (and Pocket even), portable gaming devices that play dumps of games have advanced in all areas by leaps and bounds. With all sorts of fancy user interfaces, cool features, customization, and just general nice things to have along the periphery of actually playing games. Things like RetroAchievements, Cloud Saves, more Save State support, FFW/REW, Shaders etc. etc. And in a package that is more ergonomic and better suited to the task than purely looking aesthetic. I am extremely spoiled by playing other devices, that do things the Pocket will never do, and have support the Pocket will probably never have.
When it comes to a box that sits in a cabinet/on a shelf and is permanently attached to a screen, MiSTer I still regard quite highly. I have one in an arcade cabinet and one hooked up to my Trinitron. For those use cases, hard to beat. But as a portable one of those, I find the upsides not worth it for losing everything else you would get for spending the same money on something else. I don't get enough satisfaction walking over to the shelf to grab my carts to give all that up.
But if you could make a "portable MiSTer", have it run the usual UI, same cores, same features as a full MiSTer, in a mechanically good package, I'd probably buy it. I doubt it would be my daily driver, or what I would throw in a bag for a trip, but it would be worth it for me just as a curiousity.
What are you referring to as a "clone"? Are you saying this board clones MiSTer, or that MiSTer clones other devices?
The DE-10 is a motherboard with an Intel chip on it. Terasic doesn't own the rights to doing that any more than Asus, MSI, or Gigabyte do. They've just had a monopoly on it up to now (for the purposes of a MiSTer project) and have been price gouging everyone.I'm saying the board clones the DE-10 nano. Or am I misunderstanding what they're doing?
I mean, I'm guessing they're just cloning the board and not worrying about the consequences since Terasic is based in Taiwan. But you're not legally allowed to just copy someone else's hardware are you?
This is exactly it. Terasic - the DE-10 Nano manufacturer - have exploited their surprise new market.
By cutting them out and going direct to Altera for the FPGA chip, boom, sane prices are restored.
View: https://twitter.com/takiudon_/status/1785101468498084285
I'd have to pick up some good low latency adapters (like say Raphnet) to emulate my current set up.
The DE-10 is a motherboard with an Intel chip on it. Terasic doesn't own the rights to doing that any more than Asus, MSI, or Gigabyte do. They've just had a monopoly on it up to now (for the purposes of a MiSTer project) and have been price gouging everyone.
You've misunderstood completely. It doesn't say that.So this isn't the actual Altera FPGA chip coming down in price? Just about eating in to Terasic's margin?
It seems strange how such an old chip doesnt drop in price, like normal CPUs do.
Are you talking about picking up low-latency adapters for the MiSTer?
If so, Raphnet is not the way to go - SNAC what you'd want for extremely low-latency. And it's glorious.