I'm used to waiting for sales, but now sale prices are the same as regular retail before and a price I'm willing to pay takes even longer to materialize. So even more waiting.
So basically your entire argument for why games should be 70 dollars is basically "deal with it"? Don't act like price is the issue here? Wtf in a thread about price? Are you high lolIt's completely fair and I'm not even advocating to shit down the thread or the conversation.
Your beef if the fact that you think your concerns are being rolled in to being a "Sony Hater" rather than a concerned consumer who is instead actually poor and doesn't want to be labeled as such.
You start off by talking about wealth (lol) when wealth has absolutely nothing to do with $70.
The average consumer (who's poor btw) owns a console and literally spends that, if not more on video games a year. No one here or out there is wealthy (there are some who are on here and out there lmao) but most of these are the same bredren that will be buying this same game day one even if they are in debt or not…and why? Because they want it. Even if it's their last dollar, those same people who are poor just like me…will spend above their means and get something they don't need because they want it for whatever reason they have. Does that mean you lost because they bought it day one? No. They bought what they simply wanted and that's all it is. If you can't handle people buying what they want….then say that. But don't act like price is the issue here. It's not and it won't ever be. People will pay for what they want whether you like it or not. However, there's another choice ….which is to not do that if you can't. If you want but you can't…then you know what you have to do….so what is the issue?
All the talking points you note just come off as if you would rather people not spend money, hold out for what they want, all to justify your argument to stick it to the man 💪🏾
What's even the point of this? If the people don't want it, it will show.Being upset that people are dismissing it because they simple can afford it and want it, and find the argument exhausting considering everything you have already invested in, to playing the game to even pitch a fork in the sand over this…is ridiculous.
Im not rich, I feel hard on my ass and now I can barely play video games as we speak. I sold everything from my last console and more to get a ps5 I don't even barely use. I didn't buy any of the games for it day one and I have 5 now and that's all because of sales. I'm not made of money and I can barely say that I live comfortably. But I know my limits and what I can do. I'm not however going to sit on this soap box and argue about price.
I will admit though, I did have a problem with Pokémon Snap being $60 though 😂😂 I had my reasons but I wasn't mad other people wanted it. I just thought it was crazy
Cool. You're going to pay more than someone who is fine with gaming on a sub, but that's fine if you're going in knowing that. It absolutely is the future toward making major new releases affordable to folks who don't want to drop $70 for them.
Yep! All to pubs :). It really seems to need reiterating but look at the companies advocating for the price increase. Big publishers. Devs won't see this money.IIRC game developers are paid less than comparative fields. That extra 10 is not going to them, just like that extra 10 with the jump to $60 did not go to them.
I mean no shit Sherlock haha what else are they gonna do? Steal it from a store? Doesn't mean that the price increase can't be complained aboutThere are multiple ways if you can't afford a luxury article for your hobby: save money until you can, don't buy at all or wait for a sale. That are things that we learned in our youth (80s/90s) in Germany.
Isn't that the point of this discussion? It's a luxury hobby especially buying $500 consoles in this economy.Doesn't mean that the price increase can't be complained about
love the Games are a Luxury parrot. why are they? why should they be? are they art? if so, are they the kind a bourgeois pays hundreds for to hang on their wall? i don't think so. most of em are popcorn flicks. why is playing the game equivalent of a b-list action movie a luxury?
if i want wall art i'll buy those steelbooks. if i want to support art house cinema i'll hit up itch.io. but why would i want to give even more money to the biggest industry out there?
maybe, probably there are gaping holes in my logic and i'm too idealistic but that how i've been feeling
love the Games are a Luxury parrot. why are they? why should they be? are they art? if so, are they the kind a bourgeois pays hundreds for to hang on their wall? i don't think so. most of em are popcorn flicks. why is playing the game equivalent of a b-list action movie a luxury?
if i want wall art i'll buy those steelbooks. if i want to support art house cinema i'll hit up itch.io. but why would i want to give even more money to the biggest industry out there?
maybe, probably there are gaping holes in my logic and i'm too idealistic but that how i've been feeling
What's the need for it during a time in which companies are posting all time high record profits? Do you legitimately believe that the price increase, initiated by the largest gaming publishers in the world, is going to really go all that far in helping devs if these companies are already posting record profits yet not compensating devs enough? Yes it's obviously a luxury hobby, doesn't mean it HAS to become even MORE of a luxury hobby, you get me?Isn't that the point of this discussion? It's a luxury hobby especially buying $500 consoles in this economy.
When Apple charges premium prices for their services or phones, not many complain, apart from the initial surprise. But gaming crowd is far more vocal and portrays lower pricing as something that they are "owed".
Compared to something like an iphone or the services Apple provides, gaming industry is far less compensated, even though they are arguably the ones who are at the forefront of technology breakthroughs in graphics and other related software development fields.
I don't like the price increase as a consumer but I understand the need for it.
thats fine I'm more than happy to support devs and companies with my money, just as I always have. Gaming always has and always will be this. Sure there will be services to live alongside ownership, such as Gamepass, PS Now etc, but it will most certainly not be the future. For one, majority of brand new releases will never be on the service. Sure you may get MS games day and date but you will never get majority of third parties, Sony, Nintendo etc. this alone makes it not the future.
I do agree with the fact that services like these are great complimentary services to game ownership however. For people who cannot afford lots of new releases, people with kids etc.
Whenever Game Pass gets brought up as the future I instantly think back to 2012/13 about how consoles were dead and mobile was the future and they would be the last console generation. Not every game will be $70. You don't have to buy at launch. And you can trade/sell/shop around for better deals. You can save in advance. There are plenty of options available to you. A few games a year at $70 isn't going to magically make everyone want to pay a monthly fee to be able to play a game that most probably isn't even on said gaming service.
Even if you don't like that Sony's first party games have had a price hike at this point in time, the industry at large better serves games at all price points from free to $70 than it ever has. And then for those truly budget conscious, gamepass exists too, which I don't know how you could ignore in its current pricing structure, at least.
Why are video games a luxury item? Because AAA games cost hundreds of millions to produce? They require thousands of hours to create? How on earth are video games not a luxury item?
Yes it's obviously a luxury hobby, doesn't mean it HAS to become even MORE of a luxury hobby, you get me?
Why are video games a luxury item? Because AAA games cost hundreds of millions to produce? They require thousands of hours to create? How on earth are video games not a luxury item?
An interesting distinction between games and other luxury items is that I think that games are non-essential goods first and luxury goods second, if that makes sense. Video games are most popular form of entertainment in the world. Video game consumption is just as much of a cultural phenomenon as consuming music, movies, sports, etc., and to have a widening gap that gatekeeps the have-nots from hanging out with the haves kinda sucks. Like people aren't trying to buy, store, and maintain Go Karts. They're looking for a foot in the door for the biggest form of entertainment / escapism.simply because they are not a requirement for life. They are a nice distraction from day to day, one that if you didn't do would do something else.
Same as anything that's a hobby. RC Cars, Go Karts, hell even Cars. I enjoy tinkering with my car in my free time, shit is expensive as fuck. I don't go complaining that to get a bigger Turbo and a tune cost me 3k and because it's a car should be $30.
Again, actions speak louder than words. Not buying the games will be the only thing that changes American capitalism. These are billion dollar companies.Conversations can help start changes. That is how these things work. You say it won't do anything, but people talking about this at least serves the possibility of doing something more than just shrugging it off will ever do.
If you can look at the past year and still support the capitalist idea of "let the market decide" then we won't agree on anything. Unregulated capitalism is broken and consumers can't fix it.
Very few people care about playing a game at release unless it's a multiplayer game and most of the big ones went to a F2P/seasonal format anyways. So the upfront cost isn't even the bulk of what you're paying.
You're making comparisons to mobile phones while ignoring the obvious Netflix vs physical debate:
The death of the DVD: Why sales dropped more than 86% in 13 years
DVD sales have been on the decline for over a decade, but a slew of new streaming services and a shift in how consumers are watching movies and TV shows could be the final death knell for the technology.www.cnbc.com
People like having a rotating library. That's not news.
Right. But just because a multimillion dollar corporation is in the business of making as much money as possible doesn't mean they are immune to criticism. Keeping game prices at 60 dollars isn't running a charity service lmfao they're posting record high profits at 60 dollars. I want in on this charity scheme lolI do. But it's a business and their aim is to grow. If the companies don't show a growing revenue, they aren't going to sustain. If it was a charity service, I would have agreed with you. Not even going to touch upon inflation and rising costs and growing game and team sizes.
I don't believe everyone is trolling, but most certainly some people are concern trolling many threads that have nothing to do with pricing.
And I don't think it's always a Sony thing, when MS makes a current gen exclusive game in a couple years it will be $70 as well.
Right. But just because a multimillion dollar corporation is in the business of making as much money as possible doesn't mean they are immune to criticism. Keeping game prices at 60 dollars isn't running a charity service lmfao they're posting record high profits at 60 dollars. I want in on this charity scheme lol
more then 10 with tax.Yeah, I mean it sucks, but gaming is still a luxury. If $10 is gonna break you, you should probably do the fiscally responsible thing and just wait it out.
It seems like somebody made a thread and we are discussing the topic. We don't have to agree with everything in the OP to continue the discussion.if people are trolling threads that have nothing to do with pricing, & if it's not always a sony thing, then what, exactly, are we even talking about here?...