Drag Russia (or any other country) around on this world map to see its true relative size:
Compare Countries With This Simple Tool
Drag and drop countries around the map to compare their relative size. Is Greenland really as big as all of Africa? You may be surprised at what you find! A great tool for educators.thetruesize.com
Drag Russia (or any other country) around on this world map to see its true relative size
Compare Countries With This Simple Tool
Drag and drop countries around the map to compare their relative size. Is Greenland really as big as all of Africa? You may be surprised at what you find! A great tool for educators.thetruesize.com
Forget what's its called but there's a couple different types of maps that scale continents differently. It has to do with styles of globes that carried over to written maps. Someone here made a post about it once
It is a great projection for its purpose. It wasn't meant to be used as an indicator of how big countries are. It is also why it is still in use for a lot of navigation services.I mean, yeah, it's the second largest continent. All projections are a lie, but the mercator one is pretty insidious in its lie.
Greenland:Drag Russia (or any other country) around on this world map to see its true relative size:
Compare Countries With This Simple Tool
Drag and drop countries around the map to compare their relative size. Is Greenland really as big as all of Africa? You may be surprised at what you find! A great tool for educators.thetruesize.com
Oh yeah, don't get me wrong, different projections have different utilities. It's just not the best map for the classrooms imo.It is a great projection for its purpose. It wasn't meant to be used as an indicator of how big countries are. It is also why it is still in use for a lot of navigation services.
Um. What. Is this real? My life is a lieThis twitter thread is making me go what the fuck in real time,whats real anymore lol
Drag Russia (or any other country) around on this world map to see its true relative size:
Compare Countries With This Simple Tool
Drag and drop countries around the map to compare their relative size. Is Greenland really as big as all of Africa? You may be surprised at what you find! A great tool for educators.thetruesize.com
It's called Projection, the term coming from how maps could be made by literally projecting the shadows of a globe onto a piece of paper. How the paper was held against the globe determined what it would be focusing on, with the stuff closer to touching the globe being most accurate. Shape, distance, and area get distorted the further away from that focal point you get.Forget what's its called but there's a couple different types of maps that scale continents differently. It has to do with styles of globes that carried over to written maps. Someone here made a post about it once
People complain a lot about American transit systems, but France and Germany for example are roughly the size of Texas. You can put like roughly two Texas landmasses from Seattle to Texas. There is so much space in the U.S, of course its harder for infrastructure to get off the ground.
The Mercator projection is good for navigation, but something like Gall-Peters would be better for instruction.My understanding is basically that when you take the 3D Earth and turn it into a 2D image, the size or the shape have to be fucked up, and often we've tended more towards retaining the shape. The big tell usually mentioned is that Greenland is nowhere close to the size of Africa, but a lot of popular map projections will have them basically the same.
It's small but the diversity of countries and climates is virtually unmatchedHow small Europe as actually is always gets me. It's tiny. I think learning European history makes it sound much larger than it actually is. You're talking about empires spanning multiple regions, languages, and people. World Wars that involve dozens of nations. But really you can fit most of that history in the land mass of the United States and all of it in Northern Africa with plenty of space left over.
It's small but the diversity of countries and climates is virtually unmatched
It's small but the diversity of countries and climates is virtually unmatched
So I've heard the stuff about Mercator being awful for size comparisons, Africa being deceptively large, etc., but one thing I'd never put together until seeing the light blue/dark blue map up above is that Alaska isn't nearly as big as I'd always been told. Back in elementary school it was common knowledge that Alaska was the size of the lower 48 put together, but apparently it's only about 20% of the area (663k vs 3.1m square miles). Still over twice as big as Texas, though.
People complain a lot about American transit systems, but France and Germany for example are roughly the size of Texas. You can put like roughly two Texas land masses from Seattle to Texas. There is so much space in the U.S, of course its harder for infrastructure to get off the ground.
To be fair part of US issue is shitty zoning. Outside countryside, you could have neighborhood grocery stores almost anywhere and be within easy transport distance sans cars. However, due to the zoning laws in majority of US, that's simply not possible.I'll bet this would tie in really well with the discussions we have here sometimes about the number of cars in the U.S. It would certainly help me understand how some people find it odd that everyone has a car. Even if we had public transportation here, it would take centuries to grocery shop where I live. Automobiles of some kind, preferably personal are of humongous utility.
It's small but the diversity of countries and climates is virtually unmatched
I said in terms of countries(/political systems) and climates, not ethnicities
I said in terms of countries(/political systems) and climates, not ethnicities