They are most likely considering Pro models that already are 20TF or more. Next gen consoles will go way above 30TFNo way 100TF?????
I was hoping 30TFs was on the menu for ps6 next gen in 2026-28 but damn
They are most likely considering Pro models that already are 20TF or more. Next gen consoles will go way above 30TFNo way 100TF?????
I was hoping 30TFs was on the menu for ps6 next gen in 2026-28 but damn
No just theoretical performance, RL rasterization performance is probably 2.5-3 times which if on a 375W total board power is bonkers. Like more than a 2x performance per watt improvement.
Though RT performance improvement is a big question.
No way 100TF?????
I was hoping 30TFs was on the menu for ps6 next gen in 2026-28 but damn
Correction 4K/120 ;).for the people who demand 4K/60 with maxed out ray tracing and will accept nothing less
somehow those folks still exist
Navi 33 will do that at N21 performance or even more at 1080p-1440p ;).Nice. This shit will be way above my budget but it at least bodes well for me to be able to get a great upgrade sooner rather than later.
When do y'all think I'll be able to get between 10-12 RDNA 2 teraflops for around $300-$450? Could it be possible this generation?
Also, is there a time I should expect this year's new AMD CPUs to be unveiled?
Yeah, Navi 33 is interesting because it's a TSMC 6nm part but probably 200W or less but performance on par with 6900XT if not faster at 1440p or lower. And clocked at maybe higher than 3Ghz.Am I reading this wrong or I'm right in saying that RDNA3 mid to mid-high range would have reasonable TDP/ Power requirements? All this talk of the Nvidia 40 series being very power hungry had me thinking of sticking with my 2080 for longer.
I would just enjoy it for now. It's a nice card.So I should sell my 3060 Ti Founder's Edition while I still can, right?
So you read some impossibly stupid bullshit made up by AMD fanboys?
Yeah, we already knew that Lovelace was just buying time until they can get Hopper (their mcm architecture) workingI wouldnt' be suprised if RTX 50 is a big redesign + chiplet because AD102 at least apparently is rumored to have some extensive redesigns that make it way more than just
Yeah, Navi 33 is interesting because it's a TSMC 6nm part but probably 200W or less but performance on par with 6900XT if not faster at 1440p or lower. And clocked at maybe higher than 3Ghz.
Nobody in the rumour mill is saying 500W for Navi 31. 375-500W.Where are you reading that? The chart in the op is saying like 500W
Hopper isn't for gaming. there is, allegedly, a gaming Hopper in the form of the AD102. and Hopper is monolithic, so far. there might be an MCM Hopper, but that could just be saved for BlackwellYeah, we already knew that Lovelace was just buying time until they can get Hopper (their mcm architecture) working
Chip shortage probably will make the console gen longer.Does that mean this console generation could be short in comparison to the last two?
With the chip shortages blunting growth, I don't expect next gen hardware until 2028 at the very earliest.Does that mean this console generation could be short in comparison to the last two?
Thanks a lot!With the chip shortages blunting growth, I don't expect next gen hardware until 2028 at the very earliest.
I just wish their DLSS solution was on par.
silicon and silicone are two different things :P
Fair enough. I just want something that can get me 1080p/120 at decent settings for the next few years so I'm just kind of using the assumption that the XSX/PS5 will on average be about 1440p/60 for most games this gen with my choice of future GPU, so that's just what I'm hoping/waiting on even if it'll likely not happen for a bit longer. But that's okay, I need a new CPU first anyway since my Broadwell i5 is starting to finally show it's age with the new cross gen games, and that probably won't happen until Zen 4 is unveiled so I can get hopefully the best bang for my buckNavi 33 will do that at N21 performance or even more at 1080p-1440p ;).
Hasn't been an issue for a decade, shit, Nvidia's been the one with problematic drivers since the RTX cards came out.Competition is great, but I'd never buy an AMD card because of the drivers.
You can buy 10 TF RDNA2 under 500$ right now. Its called PS5Nice. This shit will be way above my budget but it at least bodes well for me to be able to get a great upgrade sooner rather than later.
When do y'all think I'll be able to get between 10-12 RDNA 2 teraflops for around $300-$450? Could it be possible this generation?
Also, is there a time I should expect this year's new AMD CPUs to be unveiled?
TBH if I could get 4k120 on max settings I would want it. Until this happens ya, why wouldn't we want a motor powerful card? I know I am not the only one either. Why wouldn't we if it was possible?for the people who demand 4K/60 with maxed out ray tracing and will accept nothing less
somehow those folks still exist
my iPhone actually rekt me on that one lolsilicon and silicone are two different things :P
and scaling for silicon is hitting limits
Well technically I can, but I haven't been able to get one yet. I do plan to get one eventually, I just prefer PC gaming, just waiting for when an upgrade will be worthwhile for me personally since I prefer to only upgrade once or twice a console generation
I would just enjoy it for now. It's a nice card.
If you wanted to sell then you basically should have done it 3 months ago. A 3060ti non lhr already lost almost half of its value compared to late 2021
In a shop, it's all in one. You don't need CPU etc. Its sweet spot in price/ performance in gaming.
When do y'all think I'll be able to get between 10-12 RDNA 2 teraflops for around $300-$450? Could it be possible this generation?
my comment was more about people being against "smarter" ways of doing things, like upscaling. native resolution doesn't seem to be the best use of power, IMO. especially if you're aiming for 120fps. and even then, if you could do 2160/120fps, there's also the option of a lower resolution, 120fps, and even higher visual settings. for as much as people talk about IQ, there's more to it than just increasing the resolution, which these higher powered gpus can go towardsTBH if I could get 4k120 on max settings I would want it. Until this happens ya, why wouldn't we want a motor powerful card? I know I am not the only one either. Why wouldn't we if it was possible?
People stop worrying about RDNA 3's power consumption:
If correct 35W on a 9.2 TF iGPU (6 WGP @ 3GHz) with 8 Zen 4 cores in a mobile APU. It's very likely the top end card probably will consume 375W.
The big problem is y'all hearing test AD102 boards consuming 900W because Jensen's ego demands it and Nvidia Engineers testing stuff for shits and giggles.
These cards will be like 3000 dollars and people would still like to make silly comparisons with consoles again and again, everyone can throw around money and infinite power draw to make the numbers go high, i am interested when games will actually take advantage of these numbers instead of raising the resolutions to 16K and 360fps, like realistic earth deformations and simulations in real time.
Once you get to xx60 levels, power draw isn't crazy. All this power draw talk is only for the high end, xx80/xx90 and x800, x900Hmm... Managed to snag a RTX 3060 for close to MSRP ($477 Canadian, or $371 US as of this post) about a week ago. I'm using a 1650 Super at the moment, which actually performs surprisingly well (I only use a 1080p monitor)... But the 4 GB VRAM is really hurting (Really easy to max it out, even with lower settings), so when I saw a near MSRP price I had to go for it.
If the power draw of these GPUs are as high as some say they are, I think I can be happy with the 3060 for a good many years, especially with how upscaling tech is getting better. I was aware the next round of GPUs was around the corner, but since there's no guarantee you'd get them for a reasonable price and the rumored power draw, I figured I'd take the risk. Hoping it pays off, heh.